Large-Scale Evaluation of Advanced Imputation Methods for Missing Values in Smart Meter Data

Utility data (e.g., electricity, water, and gas consumption), collected by ubiquitous sensors and embedded devices, often contains substantial missing values due to various factors such as device failures and data transmission issues. The data missingness can severely impact utility billing accuracy, hinder demand forecasting, and disrupt efficient utility supply management. As a result, utility data imputation has attracted much interest from both industry and academia. While many studies have attempted to address this issue, most of them rely on aggregated datasets for training, overlooking rich user behavior information, which could provide valuable insights for more accurate imputation. However, learning comprehensive user behavior from long-term, diverse, and incomplete utility data remains a significant challenge. Moreover, leveraging user behavior information to guide imputation is nontrivial due to the indirect nature of the correlations. To address these challenges, we propose MBDiff, a Multi-view Behavior-aware Diffusion Model for Probabilistic Utility Data Imputation. MBDiff incorporates two key technical components: (i) a multi-view User Behavior Extraction module that learns comprehensive user behavior from multiple perspectives, including global, local, and instance-level views; and (ii) a behavior-aware conditional diffusion model consisting of a reference selection module and a conditional attentional denoising network to impute utility data in a computationally efficient manner. We implement and evaluate MBDiff by collaborating with one of the largest municipal utility providers in Florida. Experimental results demonstrate our proposed MBDiff effectively outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, e.g., it improves 7.04% and 29.1% on the electricity and water usage datasets for block missingness imputation, respectively.

Missing data imputation remains a fundamental challenge in modern data science, especially when uncertainty quantification is essential. In this work, we propose MissBGM, an AI-powered missing data imputation method via Bayesian generative modeling that bridges the expressive flexibility of neural networks with the statistical rigor of Bayesian inference. Unlike existing methods that often focus on point estimates or treat the missingness mechanism implicitly, MissBGM explicitly and jointly models the data-generating and missingness mechanisms, providing principled posterior uncertainty over imputations rather than a single point estimate. We develop a stochastic optimization framework with alternating updates among missing values, model parameters, and latent variables until convergence. Our theoretical analysis shows that estimates of missing values from MissBGM converge consistently under mild assumptions. Empirically, we demonstrate that MissBGM achieves superior performance over traditional imputers and recent neural network-based methods across extensive experimental settings. These results establish MissBGM as a principled and scalable solution for modern missing data imputation. The code for MissBGM is open sourced at https://github.com/liuq-lab/MissBGM.

Accurate forecasting of energy consumption is important for the efficient operation of power systems, with direct implications for operational costs, energy management, and system maintenance. Due to the availability of extensive high-resolution consumption data from smart meters, data-driven methods have been used for short-term and long-term forecasting. However, their comparative performance on real-world smart meter data is still not well studied. In this paper, we present an empirical benchmark of nine modern deep learning models for time-series forecasting, including linear, MLP-based, convolutional, and Transformer architectures. We evaluate these models on two publicly available smart meter datasets. Our analysis focuses on three factors that strongly affect forecasting performance: the length of historical input, the prediction horizon, and the choice of model architecture. We show that extending the historical context improves accuracy, but only up to a saturation point, after which additional input provides limited benefit. In contrast, accuracy decreases as the prediction horizon increases. We also investigate the trade-off between prediction accuracy and computational complexity, and assess the statistical significance and practical magnitude of performance differences across models. Our results show that deep learning models consistently outperform classical baselines, while lightweight architectures achieve relatively similar performance at significantly lower computational cost. Additionally, architectural differences only become meaningful at longer forecasting horizons and on more heterogeneous datasets. Finally, a subgroup analysis across geodemographic and household categories shows that model choice has limited impact for most population segments.