OmicSync: Reliability-Aware Spatial Multi-Omics Clustering with Evidence-Constrained LLM Reasoning

Spatially resolved omics studies increasingly combine transcriptomic and epigenomic assays, yet downstream analysis is often still performed using single-modality pipelines. We present LATTICE (Latent Alignment of Tissue-level and Transcriptomic Information for Cross-modal Embedding), a graph-based self-supervised framework that learns spot-level representations from harmonized multimodal features. LATTICE integrates five aligned modality blocks per Visium spot: Visium RNA, scMultiome RNA, scMultiome ATAC, spatial ATAC, and spatial CUT&Tag. These modalities capture spatial transcriptomic measurements, single-cell inferred regulatory activity, and in situ chromatin and histone states within a unified lattice representation. LATTICE constructs a spatial neighborhood graph and trains a TransformerConv encoder using masked reconstruction, cross-modal alignment, and spatial smoothness objectives. On a private 11-sample melanoma cohort from an anonymized clinical collaborator comprising 54{,}912 total spots, LATTICE demonstrated stable optimization behavior, reproducible embeddings across analysis seeds, and complete multimodal integration across all samples. Adding scMultiome RNA to Visium RNA alone substantially improved concordance with Space Ranger clusters across 11 runs (adjusted Rand index [ARI] +0.157, normalized mutual information [NMI] +0.143, and spatial contiguity +0.174). Additional modalities further improved spatial contiguity and multimodal utility score (MUS), although they sometimes reduced agreement with RNA-derived reference labels, likely because the learned embeddings captured chromatin and regulatory structure beyond transcriptomic similarity alone. These results position LATTICE as a practical and empirically grounded framework for multimodal spatial omics integration, while also highlighting the need for stronger supervision and broader external benchmarking.

Multi-omics sequences contain complex biological patterns, yet deciphering their mechanisms for automated scientific discovery remains challenging. As large language models (LLMs) interpret these sequences, evaluating both predictions and scientific reasoning is critical. However, existing benchmarks for multi-omics sequence tasks rely on classification and regression metrics, neglecting whether models grasp the underlying biological evidence. We introduce OmicsBench, the first reasoning benchmark for multi-omics sequences, comprising 1,160 expert-validated questions across six tasks spanning DNA regulation, RNA processing, and protein function. OmicsBench requires traceable evidence chains, evaluated using instance-specific rubrics developed with domain experts. Evaluating 17 LLMs reveals an inverse relationship: while scientific LLMs outperform general-purpose LLMs in sequence classification accuracy, they fail to provide valid evidence to support their predictions. One plausible interpretation is shortcut learning: specialized models may rely on statistical patterns rather than the biological mechanisms needed for scientific discovery. Motivated by this finding, we introduce tool-augmented on-policy distillation (TA-OPD), a post-training method to align sequence prediction with evidence-grounded biological reasoning. Across five Qwen3.5 models spanning 0.8B to 27B parameters, TA-OPD consistently strengthens biological evidence grounding while improving predictive performance on most tasks. These gains persist across model scales, indicating that stronger sequence reasoning does not arise solely from increased model capacity, but can be improved through evidence-aware training. Together, OmicsBench and TA-OPD provide a framework for diagnosing reasoning failures in multi-omics LLMs and a path toward models whose predictions are better grounded in biologically meaningful evidence.

Interpreting transcriptomic data is one of the most common analytical tasks in modern biology. Yet most current models either consume expression profiles without producing natural-language biological explanations, or reason in language without direct access to quantitative omics measurements. We introduce OmicsLM, a multimodal LLM that connects quantitative omics profiles with natural-language biological tasks. OmicsLM represents each transcriptomic profile as a compact continuous representation within the LLM context. This interface preserves quantitative expression signal while allowing natural-language instructions, explicit gene mentions, and multiple interleaved biological samples to be processed together in one model context. We train OmicsLM on more than 5.5 million instruction-following examples spanning over 70 task types, combining continuous transcriptomic inputs, experimental data rendered through diverse language templates, and free-text biological knowledge and question-answering data. This mixture covers cell type annotation, perturbation prediction, clinical prediction, pathway reasoning, and open-ended biological question answering. Existing benchmarks evaluate either profile-level prediction or text-only biological QA, leaving language-guided, multi-sample reasoning over real expression profiles unmeasured. To close this gap, we introduce GEO-OmicsQA, a benchmark for multi-sample biological question answering built from real Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) studies. We demonstrate that OmicsLM can use expression profiles directly and perform comparably to specialized omics models on profile-level tasks, while outperforming both omics-specialized models and general LLMs on language-guided biological reasoning over expression data.