cs.AIAug 24, 2026

Generating Biomedical Fact-Checking Reports with RL-Enhanced Agentic Search

Authors: Jiongxiao Wang, Dingli Ma, Chaoqun Ni

Organizations: University of Wisconsin–Madison · University of Washington

Abstract

Automated fact-checking is essential for ensuring the reliability of public health information, yet the biomedical domain poses unique challenges. Validating biomedical claims requires rigorous interpretation of scientific literature, assessment of retrieved evidence, and comprehensive justification toward the conclusion. Although Large Language Models (LLMs) enhanced by Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and agentic search perform automated fact-checking in a retrieve-then-verify paradigm, current methods still output isolated prediction labels, lacking explanatory depth and offers limited utility for human understanding. To bridge this gap, we introduce an LLM-based agent named BioCheck Agent that generates structured biomedical fact-checking reports with agentic search. Rather than merely outputting supported or refuted labels, our agent synthesizes final conclusions with retrieved evidence and rigorous analysis. To ensure domain-specific accuracy, BioCheck Agent exclusively searches high-quality scientific literature in PubMed, utilizing advanced Boolean search operators. Recognizing that direct prompting often results in hallucinations and low-quality reports, especially for lightweight open-source models, we further propose the Evidence-Grounded Group Relative Policy Optimization (EG-GRPO) to perform reinforcement learning on BioCheck Agent with a task-specific reward that incentivizes advanced search behavior and high-quality evidence retrieval while penalizing hallucinations. Our experimental results show that compared to the base model Qwen3.5-4B, BioCheck Agent with EG-GRPO improves label prediction accuracy on SciFact by 9.95%. Furthermore, it achieves a 3.7% higher evidence quality score and a 19.63% lower evidence hallucination rate, demonstrating its ability to generate biomedical fact-checking reports with improved accuracy and quality.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables3 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. When Retrieval Helps and Distracts: Evaluating Evidence-Generating LLMs for Biomedical Claim Verification

    Aug 2, 2026Pritam Deka, Prabhjot SinghExplainable Artificial IntelligenceAutomated Fact-Checking

  2. Reason and Verify: A Framework for Faithful Retrieval-Augmented Generation

    Mar 10, 2026Eeham Khan, Luis Rodriguez, Marc QueudotRAG Citation FaithfulnessRetrieval-Augmented Generation