Multi-Sensor Mapping of Vulnerable Urban Settlements Using SAR, Multispectral, and Hyperspectral Imagery: A Case Study in Córdoba, Argentina
Organizations: Department of Electrical, Computer and Biomedical Engineering, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy · Instituto Gulich, UNC-CONAE-CONICET, Córdoba, Argentina · Department of Engineering, University of Sannio, 82100 Benevento, Italy
Abstract
Informal settlements represent a major urban challenge in rapidly expanding cities, yet their identification from Earth Observation (EO) data remains difficult because of their heterogeneous appearance and incomplete official inventories. This work presents a multi-sensor deep learning (DL) framework for slum-likelihood mapping in Córdoba, Argentina, integrating high-resolution PlanetScope multispectral (MS) imagery, COSMO-SkyMed (CSK) Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data, and medium-resolution PRISMA hyperspectral (HS) observations. The problem is formulated as a patch-level classification task using the official Registro Nacional de Barrios Populares (ReNaBaP) inventory as reference, and the models are evaluated through four geographically partitioned folds. SAR-only and MS-only baselines, their configurations with PRISMA HS support, and early fusion (EF), middle fusion (MF), and late fusion (LF) strategies are systematically compared. Results show that LF+HS provides the best overall balance between classification performance and spatial selectivity, while PRISMA contributes complementary spectral information alongside the higher-resolution MS and SAR representations. Beyond the standard evaluation against ReNaBaP, an external municipal vulnerability layer is used to interpret detections outside the official polygons, showing that several apparent false positives overlap broader vulnerable urban areas. Thermal analysis further shows that ReNaBaP settlements exhibit significantly higher surface temperatures than their immediate surroundings during a heatwave event, indicating localised surface-heat amplification. Taken together, these results suggest that multi-sensor EO fusion can support both the mapping of ReNaBaP settlements and the interpretation of broader urban vulnerability patterns.
Figures & tables
| Data source | Category | Acquisition date / version | Product / attributes | Spatial resolution / unit | Role in the workflow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COSMO-SkyMed | SAR image | 28-07-2025 | L1D GTC, single-pol HH backscatter | 3 m | High-resolution SAR input |
| PlanetScope | Multispectral image | 19-07-2025 | Surface reflectance, 8 bands | 3 m | High-resolution MS input |
| PRISMA | Hyperspectral image | 28-03-2021 | L2D surface reflectance, original 230-band cube | 30 m | PCA-reduced spectral descriptors |
| Landsat-8 TIRS | Thermal image | 03-01-2022 | Collection 2 Level-2 Band 10 surface temperature product | 100 m | Surface-temperature comparison |
| ReNaBaP | Reference polygons | 2025 | Official barrios populares inventory | Settlement polygons | Label derivation and reference-map comparison |
| CBA layer | Contextual polygons | 2025 | High-/low-vulnerability classes | Neighbourhood-scale units | Contextual interpretation |
| Fold 1 | Fold 2 | Fold 3 | Fold 4 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 383 | 403 | 385 | 363 | 1534 |
| 24.97% | 26.27% | 25.10% | 23.66% | 100.00% |
| Metric | SAR- and MS-based configurations | Multi-sensor fusion strategies | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAR | SAR+HS | MS | MS+HS | EF | EF+HS | MF | MF+HS | LF | LF+HS | |
| Precision | 0.3590 | 0.2623 | 0.4103 | 0.4267 | 0.2426 | 0.2828 | 0.3913 | 0.4737 | 0.4000 | 0.5455 |
| Recall | 0.4746 | 0.5424 | 0.5424 | 0.5424 | 0.6942 | 0.6949 | 0.6102 | 0.3051 | 0.6441 | 0.6102 |
| F1-score | 0.4088 | 0.3536 | 0.4672 | 0.4776 | 0.3596 | 0.4020 | 0.4768 | 0.3711 | 0.4935 | 0.5760 |
| AUROC | 0.8198 | 0.8757 | 0.8634 | 0.8837 | 0.8676 | 0.8929 | 0.8880 | 0.8298 | 0.8826 | 0.8674 |
| Accuracy | 0.9472 | 0.9237 | 0.9524 | 0.9544 | 0.9048 | 0.9205 | 0.9485 | 0.9602 | 0.9492 | 0.9654 |
Remote Sensing Image Understanding
Remote sensing image understanding uses AI to interpret satellite and aerial imagery for objects, land cover, change, hazards, and spatial relationships.
See all 208 papers