cs.CVAug 31, 2026

AI-enabled Low-Cost 3D Maize Ear Morphometry Platform at Breeding Scale

Authors: Therin YoungElijah RodriguezLisa CoffeyTalukder Zaki JuberyAdarsh KrishnamurthyPatrick SchnableBaskar Ganapathysubramanian

Abstract

Maize ear geometry (length, width, curvature, and volume) is closely tied to yield and grain-filling outcomes, but existing high-throughput phenotyping pipelines remain constrained by the cost, labor, and specialized hardware they require. We developed and validated a low-cost pipeline that reconstructs a watertight 3-D mesh of a maize ear from a single 20-second video captured with a consumer-grade DSLR on a motorized turntable under uniform LED illumination. Camera poses from a multi-seed COLMAP procedure initialize a Neural Radiance Field (NeRF), and a cylindrical holder of known diameter, visible in every frame, provides automatic metric scaling with downstream geometric quality control. Applied to 300 ears spanning a diverse maize inbred panel, 250 (83.3%) passed automated processing and quality control. Skeleton length agreed with manual caliper measurements across all 250 ears (R^2 = 0.964, RMSE = 4.68 mm), and convex-hull volume agreed with water-displacement volume on a 15-ear subset spanning the full size range (R^2 = 0.982, RMSE = 5.26 mL). Residual length error grew with ear curvature, whereas bounding-box height, which records the same straight-line chord as calipers, showed no such trend; the discrepancy therefore originates in the measurement definition, since calipers record the chord while skeleton length traces the geodesic arc. The capture hardware costs approximately 607 USD, and operator involvement fell from roughly five minutes to one minute per ear, with all downstream processing running unattended. The platform provides a foundation for breeding-scale 3-D ear phenotyping.

Explore similar work

Sep 1, 2026cs.CV

Automated Maize Ear Phenotyping Using 3D Reconstructions

Maize kernel traits such as row number, kernels per row, and kernel size vary largely for genetic reasons and are consistently associated with regions of the genome that influence yield. Manual measurement of these traits, however, cannot keep pace with the volume of maize generated in a breeding program. To address this, we developed and validated a fully automated pipeline for extracting these traits from 3D point clouds of corn ears, built on a recently developed video-to-point-cloud platform. Raw video frames are processed through COLMAP and NeRF, the ear is isolated via density-based separation, and the point cloud is distance-calibrated to physical units. The calibrated ear point cloud was Z-axis aligned via PCA and cylindrically unwrapped to a 2D image. We enhanced contrast and performed zero-fine-tuning instance segmentation using Cellpose-SAM. A triple-juxtaposed unwrap strategy was used to prevent double-counting at the seam. The pipeline achieved kernel count R^2 = 0.921 (MAPE = 10.33%) and kernel row number within +-2 rows for 95.2% of ears (MAE = 0.75 rows) on a 168-ear held-out set from the 268-ear labeled dataset. The resulting multi-trait dataset has known genotype identity for each ear, positioning it for phenotype-to-genotype association analyses.
Ritwesh A. Kumar, Som Tripathi, Peja Matthews +5
Jul 2, 2026cs.CV

The Turning Point of 3D Plant Phenotyping: 3D Foundation Models Enable Minute-to-Second Cross-Crop Reconstruction and Beyond

3D plant phenotyping is notoriously known to be procedure-complicated and of low throughput due to the extensive multi-view imaging, the fragile 3D reconstruction pipeline, and the additional cost from reconstructed geometry to phenotypic extraction. These limitations are further amplified in low-cost data acquisition, where smartphone videos or sparsely sampled multi-view images provide limited view overlap and self-occlusion. In this work, we show that the conventional 3D plant phenotyping pipeline could be streamlined and significantly accelerated with 3D Foundation Models (3DFMs), and particularly, present one of the first cross-crop 3D phenotyping frameworks powered by 3DFMs. The framework replaces COLMAP-style sparse initialization with 3DFM-based feed-forward geometric recovery, combines geometry-constrained 3D Gaussian Splatting for dense reconstruction, enables few-view reconstruction through iterative view synthesis and refinement, and converts reconstructed geometry into measurable organs through 2D-to-3D semantic transfer, metric scale recovery, and organ instance separation. We further construct a cross-crop dataset with smartphone-based image acquisition, diverse plant morphologies, and manual annotations for segmentation and phenotypic evaluation. Experiments across 26 plant sequences show that 3D Foundation Models reduce the average reconstruction time from 6.52 minutes to 1.58 seconds while maintaining high reconstruction quality and phenotyping accuracy. These results suggest a fresh technical route for high-throughput 3D plant phenotyping, from low-cost image acquisition to fast reconstruction, perception, scale recovery, and phenotypic measurement.
Hanyue Jia, Wei Zhou, Wenbo Zhou +3
Sep 15, 2026cs.CV

Evaluating Mesh Reconstruction Methods for Crop Phenotyping

Phenotyping an agricultural crop is crucial for studying its entire life cycle, as it provides vital insights to improve yield and, ultimately, food production. Doing the same for crops grown on remote sites is a challenge for the specialists who cannot be available on-site. 3D reconstruction techniques offer a promising solution to this problem by enabling crop digitization, allowing specialists to access the resulting 3D crop models from anywhere at any time. In this work, we evaluate recent 3D reconstruction pipelines for crop phenotyping. We focus on 7 mesh reconstruction pipelines and measure the fidelity and consistency of their outputs qualitatively and quantitatively. Our results suggest that the meshes produced by the GGGS, PGSR, and 2DGS are preferable to the other pipelines, owing to their quantitative metrics and visually pleasing outputs. The GGGS pipeline is better than the second-best pipeline (2DGS) by about 27% on the radar chart with 5 dimensions, namely, User ratings, Chamfer distance, LPIPS, PSNR, and SSIM.
Karanvir Singh, Theo Morales, Binh-Son Hua +1