BrainDiff: Longitudinal Report Generation for Multimodal Brain MRI

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) interpretation is fundamental to clinical decision-making, requiring radiologists to integrate multi-view anatomical planes across sequential timepoints while precisely localizing interval changes. However, existing vision-language benchmarks remain confined to single-timepoint, single-view interpretation, failing to capture the temporal-spatial reasoning essential to radiologic practice. We introduce the Time-Aware Multi-View MRI Benchmark, an evaluation framework unifying multi-view anatomical input, temporal reasoning across longitudinal scans, and structured localization guidance. The benchmark comprises 3,920 expert-verified question-answer pairs derived from 890 patients across over 3,200 longitudinal MRI timepoints, drawn from seven clinical cohorts covering glioblastoma, neurodegeneration, vestibular schwannoma, and brain metastases, in open-ended, multiple-choice, and binary formats, requiring models to identify anatomical regions of maximal change, characterize progression across sequences and views, and provide structured guidance specifying boundaries, imaging features, and confounders. Experiments across 16 vision-language models reveal moderate temporal alignment but systematic failure on change direction recognition and volumetric quantification, while multi-view inputs improve spatial localization yet degrade temporal reasoning in compact architectures. Our benchmark provides a systematic framework for evaluating progression tracking, interval change localization, and temporal ordering, which are essential for clinical deployment. Code, evaluation splits, and the dataset are available at: https://github.com/wafaAlghallabi/Time-Aware-MRI.

Accurate longitudinal analysis of brain MRI is often hindered by evolving lesions, which bias automated neuroimaging pipelines. While deep generative models have shown promise in inpainting these lesions, most existing methods operate cross-sectionally or lack 3D anatomical continuity. We present a novel pseudo-3D longitudinal inpainting framework based on Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models (DDPM). Our approach utilizes multi-channel conditioning to incorporate longitudinal context from distinct visits (t_1, t_2) and extends Region-Aware Diffusion (RAD) to the medical domain, focusing the generative process on pathological regions without altering surrounding healthy tissue. We evaluated our model against state-of-the-art baselines on longitudinal brain MRI from 93 patients. Our model significantly outperforms the leading baseline (FastSurfer-LIT) in terms of perceptual fidelity, reducing the Learned Perceptual Image Patch Similarity (LPIPS) distance from 0.07 to 0.03 while effectively eliminating inter-slice discontinuities. Furthermore, our model demonstrates high longitudinal stability with a Temporal Fidelity Index of 1.024, closely approaching the ideal value of 1.0 and substantially narrowing the gap compared to LIT's TFI of 1.22. Notably, the RAD mechanism provides a substantial gain in efficiency; our framework achieves an average processing time of 2.53 min per volume, representing approximately 10x speedup over the 24.30 min required by LIT. By leveraging longitudinal priors and region-specific denoising, our framework provides a highly reliable and efficient preprocessing step for the study of progressive neurodegenerative diseases. A derivative dataset consisting of 93 pre-processed scans used for testing will be available upon request after acceptance. Code will be released upon acceptance.

Objectives: Automatic data extraction from free-text radiology reports enables large-scale research, but few studies assessed the performance of large language models (LLMs) on Dutch neuroradiology reports. Methods: We analyzed 947 brain MRI reports from a tertiary memory clinic (2016-2021), authored by consultant neuroradiologists. Trained medical students annotated thirty variables; 100 reports were double-annotated to assess inter-rater reliability. We evaluated the performance of the open-weight LLM LLaMA 3.1 using different languages (Dutch vs. English translation) and few-shot prompting with different example selection strategies. Performance was evaluated using balanced accuracy for categorical variables, accuracy and mean absolute error for counts, and text similarity for free-text. Metrics were computed across 10 random splits of the 947 reports. Results: LLaMA 3.1 demonstrated high zero-shot performance for visual rating scores (mean [95%-CI]): Medial Temporal Atrophy: 90% [77-100%] on the left and 96% [94-99%] on the right, Global Cortical Atrophy: 87% [83-91%], and Fazekas: 94% [93-96%]. Microbleed mentions were detected with 93% accuracy [92-95%] and infarct mentions with 82% [80-84%]. Text similarity for lesion location reached 0.95 [0.95-0.96]. Performance was lower for numerical variables: 80% [78-82%] for the number of microbleeds and 66% [63-68%] for infarcts. English translation yielded comparable results. Few-shot prompting improved performance for numerical variables, achieving 92% [90-93%] for microbleeds and 81% [77-85%] for infarcts using structural similarity-based selection. Conclusion: LLaMA 3.1 shows strong potential for extracting data from Dutch neuroradiology reports. Few-shot prompting enhances performance for numerical variables, whereas challenges remain for location-specific variables.