Peg-in-Bench: A Modular Benchmark for High-Precision Robotic Insertion
Authors: Yosel Delgado, José G. Buenaventura-Carreón, Floris Erich, Roman Mykhailyshyn, Tomohiro Motoda, Koshi Makihara, Yukiyasu Domae
Abstract
High-precision insertion remains a fundamental challenge in robotic manipulation due to the strict alignment requirements and contact-rich interactions involved. Although peg-in-hole tasks are widely used for evaluation, existing bench- marks often rely on fixed task configurations, limiting their ability to assess robustness and generalization across different insertion scenarios. This paper introduces a reconfigurable peg-in-hole benchmark designed to evaluate task generalization in high-precision insertion. The benchmark consists of a set of fully 3D-printable modular components, including multiple peg geometries, tolerance levels, and configurable base structures that can be combined to generate a large variety of insertion and assembly tasks. By varying object layouts, orientations, and task structures while maintaining controlled physical conditions, the benchmark enables systematic evaluation of adaptation to unseen scenarios. To support reproducibility, we additionally provide a scenario generation tool capable of producing standardized task configurations and machine-readable task descriptions. The scenario generation tool and the STL files of the benchmark pieces are available through the project repository: https://github.com/aistairc/peg-in-bench.
Slender rod insertion arises in precision manufacturing, where millimetre scale diameter and tight clearances demand accurate perception and control. Conventional peg-in-hole methods assume a rigid object whose tip pose is fixed relative to the gripper. This assumption breaks down for a high aspect ratio rod, which can bend during manipulation, making its tip motion dependent on the rod configuration, grasp, material properties, and contact. We present RodForesight, a learning framework that factorises the task into two stages: 1) coarse approaching, which uses visual servoing to map diverse initial configurations into a compact near hole hand-off region; and 2) predictive insertion, which performs fine alignment and completes the insertion. It is worth noting that the two stages can be wrapped into an end-to-end design. During insertion, a diffusion policy generates candidate action chunks, while an action conditioned world model predicts their effects on rod-hole alignment. This pre-execution evaluation enables RodForesight to select the best action chunk based on predicted tilt and radial errors before execution. Experiments investigate the performance of different stages and the end-to-end setting, where RodForesight improves the success rate from 88.9% to 96.7%, compared to baseline methods such as diffusion policy.
We introduceWorkBenchMark, a LEGO Duplo-based robotic assembly benchmark motivated by the RoboCup Smart Manufacturing League. Robotic assembly couples low-level manipulation with task-level symbolic reasoning under physical constraints, a combination that current end-to-end learning methods do not yet solve reliably. The benchmark provides 400 tasks across four complexity tiers. We provide an open-vocabulary perception, Assembly-by-Disassembly baseline solution. Our planning-based pipeline outperforms a modern vision-language-action approach across all tiers. The benchmark, simulation environment, and baseline implementation will be released openly to support the broader robotic assembly community.
High-precision assembly frequently involves tight-tolerance insertions, where even slight pose errors can cause jamming or excessive interaction forces, making robust and safe insertion policies difficult to obtain. This paper proposes a tactile-augmented two-stage method that combines Imitation Learning (IL) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) for precision insertion tasks. In the first stage, IL learns a reaching policy with position generalization that grasps the peg and brings it to the vicinity of the target region. In the second stage, RL executes the insertion and enables recovery from failures during contact-rich interactions. To better exploit tactile feedback, we introduce tactile group sampling to increase coverage of critical contact segments during training, and design a tactile critic to more accurately evaluate policy values, improving insertion performance while maintaining low contact forces. We conduct systematic experiments across five hole geometries and three clearance settings. Results show that our method substantially improves insertion performance across all settings; under the most challenging 0.05,mm clearance, it achieves a 67% success rate while keeping contact forces low, reducing the maximum interaction force by 60% and torque by 44%, thereby validating both effectiveness and safety for precision assembly.