cs.CVSep 1, 2026

What, Where, and How: Probing Spatiotemporal Representations in Video Foundation Models

Authors: Sharon S. MusaFereshteh ForghaniHarrish ThasarathanSonia JosephMatthew KowalKonstantinos G. Derpanis

Abstract

Self-supervised video foundation models learn rich spatiotemporal representations, yet it remains unclear what visual concepts these representations encode, where they emerge across transformer layers, and how they are geometrically organized. In this work, we tackle these three questions through a systematic layer-wise analysis of V-JEPA 2 and VideoMAE-v2. We leverage lightweight probes trained to discover three temporally grounded properties: (i) camera motion understanding, (ii) intuitive physics, and (iii) anomaly detection. Both models encode camera motion, with best results (>90>90 ROC AUC) emerging at 60-70% of network depth, and achieve moderate anomaly detection performance (>60>60 ROC AUC), but remain near chance on intuitive-physics tasks, suggesting a limited encoding of deeper physical reasoning. Beyond classification, we find that temporal features from individual videos form smooth low-dimensional trajectories in representation space, suggesting that camera motion is not only linearly decodable but also geometrically organized. Based on these results, we apply geometry-aware spline-based steering in the model's latent representations to interpolate camera motion, yielding steered videos with smoother trajectories and more coherent temporal progression than linear interpolation.

Explore similar work

Jun 8, 2026cs.CV

Do Video Foundation Models Understand Intuitive Physics? A Layerwise Probing Analysis

We study whether pretrained video foundation models encode intuitive-physics information in their frozen representations, and how this information varies across model families, layers, and probe types. Using frozen-feature probing on IntPhys2 and Minimal Video Pairs (MVP), we compare predictive joint-embedding models (V-JEPA), masked reconstruction models (VideoMAE), and a diffusion-based video generator (LTX-Video). V-JEPA achieves the strongest overall results across benchmarks, especially with probes that model temporal dynamics, while VideoMAE remains competitive and LTX-Video recovers weaker but non-trivial signal. Layerwise analyses show that physics-relevant information is weakest in early layers and becomes most accessible at intermediate-to-late depth, and temporal controls show that disrupting frame order substantially reduces performance, especially on MVP. Together, these results suggest that intuitive-physics knowledge emerges reliably in pretrained video representations, but its accessibility depends strongly on pretraining paradigm, representational depth, and readout mechanism.
Samuele Punzo, Niccolò Caselli, Ippokratis Pantelidis +3
May 18, 2026cs.CV

Towards Data-Efficient Video Pre-training with Frozen Image Foundation Models

Video foundation models achieve strong performance across many video understanding tasks, but typically require large-scale pre-training on massive video datasets, resulting in substantial data and compute costs. In contrast, modern image foundation models already provide powerful spatial representations. This raises an important question: can competitive video models be built by reusing these spatial representations and pre-training only for temporal reasoning? We take initial steps toward exploring a lightweight training paradigm that freezes a pre-trained image foundation model and trains only a recurrent temporal module to process streaming video. By reusing an image foundation model as a spatial encoder, this approach could significantly reduce the amount of video data and compute required compared to end-to-end video pre-training. In this work, we explore the feasibility of this approach before investing in computing for video pre-training. Our empirical findings across multiple video understanding tasks suggest that strong temporal performance can emerge without large-scale video pre-training, motivating future work on recurrent video foundation models obtained by pre-training a temporal module on top of a frozen image foundation model. Code: https://github.com/tue-mps/towards-video-image-frozen .
Svetlana Orlova, Niccolò Cavagnero, Gijs Dubbelman
May 15, 2026cs.CV

Latent Video Prediction Learns Better World Models

Self-supervised video models are increasingly framed as world models, yet their evaluation remains largely confined to a single top-1 accuracy score on clean benchmarks. This leaves a major gap in comprehending their potential as world models. We present the first systematic study addressing this gap, analyzing four matched-capacity frontier video foundation models, V-JEPA 2.1, V-JEPA 2, VideoPrism, and VideoMAEv2, across five robustness axes relevant to their deployment as video world models: feature discriminability, corruption robustness, fine-grained discrimination, occlusion robustness, and sensitivity to temporal direction. Our evaluations establish that across all five axes, latent-prediction models form a distinct and consistent profile. They degrade more gracefully under pixel corruption, preserve usable class structure rather than mere geometric stability under occlusion, capture fine-grained physical contact cues without reconstructing pixels, and uniquely encode the arrow of time. These advantages can even survive task adaptation: a frozen V-JEPA 2 backbone with a lightweight attentive probe outperforms a fully fine-tuned VideoMAE and a supervised TimeSformer on corruption and occlusion robustness. Our extensive results offer concrete new evidence in favor of latent prediction for robust world modeling.
Ali J Alrasheed, Aryan Yazdan Parast, Basim Azam +2