Abstract
Ensuring the security of the power system is essential for stability and reliability, especially in the event of disruption. Effective classification of contingency in power systems enables proactive decision-making and mitigates large-scale breakdowns and failures. This study explores the use of machine learning algorithms to classify security levels of contingencies in power systems into safe, moderate or severe classes. For this approach, Newton-Raphson load flow method extracts system data from contingency scenarios, using Overall Performance Index (OPI) as safety measure. For data pre-processing, Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is used to address class imbalance and reduce dimensionality, respectively. K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machines (SVM) is trained and evaluated on datasets generated through N-k contingency scenarios for k equal 1, 2, and 3 on IEEE-14 and IEEE-30 bus systems using four hybrid pre-processing configurations: normalized, SMOTE-balanced, PCA-transformed, and a combined SMOTE PCA-transformed. Performance is assessed by precision, recall and F1 score, with priority given to the severe contingency classes. The RF achieved the highest F1 scores of 0.97 in IEEE-30 and 0.86 in IEEE-14, SVM benefits significantly from PCA and improves the accuracy of the classification, while KNN is best suited for SMOTE and PCA conversion. The findings show that PCA contributes more than SMOTE to the overall performance of the model. However, SMOTE improves recall but can introduce false positives and is therefore a compromise of accuracy. This study highlights machine learning as a scalable and powerful alternative to traditional contingency analysis, which improves the assessment of security in real time.
Explore similar work
Jul 17, 2026cs.LG
Data-driven pre-fault dynamic security assessment (DSA) rapidly evaluates the dynamic risk of credible contingencies on a power system using machine learning. Existing approaches face two limitations. First, they require a large labelled database for training, with a separate model trained, tuned, and maintained for each contingency in a potentially long list of credible contingencies. Second, the trained models generalize poorly to unseen contingencies. This work addresses the limitations by using a tabular foundation model (TFM) that assesses stability through in-context learning, requiring no retraining or hyperparameter optimization. A single TFM can assess many contingencies at once, removing the need for one model per classifier. We also characterize when the use of electrical distance coordinates (EDC) as continuous features enables generalization of TFM to unseen contingencies and when they do not, demonstrating how a few labelled samples can reliably improve generalization. Through comprehensive case studies on the IEEE 68-bus system, we show that a single TFM attains an average Macro F1 score of about 90% with only 120 labelled samples per contingency, roughly two orders of magnitude fewer than conventionally assumed, without any model retraining or hyperparameter tuning. For new/unseen contingencies, we show that using just 10 labelled samples of the new contingency with EDC encoding matches the best achievable transfer learning oracle model, which requires fully labelled data and is not deployable in practice. Overall, this initial study paves the way towards developing and deploying foundation models for power system operations, with possible applications across multiple operational tasks.
Olayiwola Arowolo, Maosheng Yang, Jochen Cremer
Jul 9, 2026cs.LG
Cyber-physical power systems are vulnerable to cascading failures caused by tight interdependencies between power and communication infrastructures. Evaluating these failures over large N-k contingency sets with a high-fidelity simulator is computationally prohibitive for resilience planning. Using the previously published Modified Implicative Interdependency Model (MIIM) as the ground-truth cascade simulator, this paper develops a machine-learning surrogate that predicts contingency severity from leakage-free structural features and derives a component-criticality ranking for prioritized hardening analysis. On the IEEE 118-bus system, the Gradient Boosting surrogate achieves Spearman correlations of 0.849 for per-contingency severity prediction and 0.853 for per-component criticality ranking, while remaining stable across three independently sampled datasets. MIIM-derived component criticality itself reproduces only to a Spearman of approximately 0.85 under the present sampling pipeline, and the surrogate operates at this empirical ceiling to within sampling variation. Topological centrality measures on the full interdependent network provide meaningful baselines (Spearman 0.60-0.69), and feature ablation shows that the surrogate's advantage is driven primarily by inter-layer dependency information. These results support a two-stage workflow in which the surrogate rapidly ranks candidate components and MIIM is reserved for selective verification.
Sohini Roy, Xheni Hylviu
Jul 18, 2026eess.SY
In many cases, the outage of one transmission line in a system can be localized by monitoring the power flow of another line, and machine learning methods can be used to distinguish the cases under uncertainty. In this study, we examine the improvements in line outage localization performance achieved by various ensemble classifiers compared to single-model methods. In the case studies, we compared the classification results with measurement data collected at observed transmission lines (OTLs) selected using three algorithms, i.e, greedy maximum coverage problem (MCP), high-eta, and random selection, based on two sensitivity factors, i.e., line outage distribution factors (LODFs) and line outage impact factors (LOIFs). We found that the OTLs selected by the greedy MCP algorithm yielded the highest F1 score and the ensemble classifiers significantly outperformed a base kNN classifier. The extra-trees bagging technique achieved the highest F1 score in many instances. All the findings were statistically significant.
Daniel Flores, Yuanrui Sang, Michael P. McGarry