Information-Guided Safe Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Gas Source Localization using sUAS
Organizations: Electrical Engineering & Computer Science Graduate Program, University of California, Merced, 5200 N. Lake Rd, Merced, CA 95343, USA · Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Merced, 5200 N. Lake Rd, Merced, CA 95343, USA
Abstract
The autonomous localization of fugitive gas emissions using small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) constitutes a fundamentally ill-posed inverse problem. In turbulent atmospheric boundary layers, highly intermittent scalar concentration fields violate the assumptions of classical gradient-based navigation, causing data-driven estimators to suffer from severe noise and spurious local minima. To address these challenges, we introduce an Information-Guided Safe Reinforcement Learning framework evaluated within a custom, GPU-accelerated 3D simulation environment coupling an Eulerian wind solver with a Lagrangian puff dispersion model. We identify a critical vulnerability in deterministic information-seeking planners - a Gramian bias where agents act greedily upon flawed early estimates, starving the estimator of spatial diversity. To systematically break this degeneracy, our architecture integrates a classical empirical observability Gramian (EMGR) planner with a learned Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) exploratory policy. A deterministic meta-supervisor actively monitors estimator reliability via Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence, dynamically blending deterministic exploitation with learned exploration to steer the sUAS into high-information zones. Trained via a progressive curriculum and safeguarded by a strictly enforced Robust Control Barrier Function (RCBF), our RL framework achieves nearly 80% localization success on complex, mobile sources - drastically outperforming classical baselines (~30%) - while ensuring zero safety violations.
Figures & tables
| Method | Success | Med. Dist. [5th, 95th] | Med. Steps |
| MLE+EMGR | 30.4% | 24.3 [4.7, 135.8] m | 1173 |
| MLE+EMGR+PF+KL | 32.1% | 25.0 [4.8, 159.3] m | 2000 |
| Stage 1 (small) | 98.8% | 4.9 [4.7, 5.0] m | 256 |
| Stage 2 (full) | 79.3% | 4.9 [4.7, 43.8] m | 310 |
| Stage 3 (mobile) | 78.6% | 4.8 [4.5, 59.2] m | 276 |
| Method | Active | Max Corr. | Min | Violations |
| MLE+EMGR | 12.9% | 4.87 | 2.54 m | 0 |
| MLE+EMGR+PF+KL | 7.2% | 4.84 | 2.54 m | 0 |
| Stage 1 | 88.9% | 6.91 | 3.04 m | 0 |
| Stage 2 | 84.3% | 5.77 | 3.04 m | 0 |
| Stage 3 | 88.4% | 5.59 | 3.04 m | 0 |
UAV Navigation
Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) navigation develops methods for locating and guiding drones safely through known, unknown, and changing environments.
See all 272 papers