Radiation, Rotation and Scale Invariant Feature Descriptor for Multimodal Image Matching
Authors: Yuanxin Ye, Tengfeng Tang, Tao Peng, Zhiqiang Han, Jiayuan Li, Mi Wang
Organizations: Faculty of Geosciences and Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, China · School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China · State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing,Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
Multimodal image matching is a fundamental task for multi-source information fusion. However, geometric distortions and nonlinear radiometric differences (NRD) severely limit performance, especially under radiometric, rotation, and scale variations. To address this issue, we propose a radiation, rotation, and scale invariant (RRSI) feature descriptor. First, a dual-head regional sampling (DHRS) module simultaneously performs Cartesian and Log-Polar sampling on keypoint neighborhoods, retaining spatial structural properties while enhancing robustness to rotation and scale variations. We then jointly encode geometric and radiometric relations between multimodal images in a unified deep feature space, enabling feature encoding, interaction, and fusion across intra-modal, dual-head sampled, and inter-modal regions. Furthermore, we introduce a bidirectional cross-modal generative reconstruction constraint during training. By decoding implicit features into structural patches of the counterpart modality, this mechanism anchors modality-invariant geometric topologies without additional inference overhead. Experiments on optical-infrared and optical-SAR datasets demonstrate highly competitive matching performance and strong robustness to rotation and scale variations. RRSI supports the full rotation range from 0 to 360 degrees and scale factors up to four. Its generalization ability is further validated on multimodal images from computer vision, remote sensing, and medical imaging. The implementation will be made publicly available at https://github.com/yeyuanxin110/RRSI .
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Multimodal image examples from different fields
Figure 2: Overall framework of multimodal image matching based on the RRSI descriptor
Figure 3: Flowchart of keypoint detection incorporating scale pyramid, gradient magnitude maps, and FAST detector
Figure 4: Local region sampling (Cartesian vs. Log-Polar) under different sampling ratios
Figure 5: The architecture of self attention and cross attention
Figure 6: Training-phase supervision mechanism of the cross-modal generative reconstruction decoders. The two symmetric branches illustrate cross-modal pseudo-patch generation and the source-side skip connections used to regularize the joint representation space through LRec .
Figure 7: Examples of Multimodal Images from Experimental Datasets
Methods
LLVIP
DroneVehicle
OSdataset
RMSE
AUC/(%)
RMSE
AUC/(%)
RMSE
AUC/(%)
/px
@3px
@5px
@10px
/px
@3px
@5px
@10px
/px
@3px
@5px
@10px
RIFT [ 12 ]
5.01
3.27
9.38
24.14
5.04
3.46
8.19
19.37
4.74
4.05
9.15
20.99
WSSF [ 30 ]
5.36
2.87
7.42
21.39
5.21
4.74
9.52
21.30
5.09
3.81
10.54
26.57
LoFTR [ 32 ]
3.17
18.65
39.99
67.03
3.40
20.66
37.23
59.99
3.72
11.12
29.06
55.40
LightGlue [ 18 ]
3.37
17.27
36.99
66.36
2.86
25.08
45.27
69.02
3.53
14.07
35.26
64.53
Table 1: Quantitative Results of Image Matching on the LLVIP, DroneVehicle, and OSdataset ( Bold Indicates the Optimal Value, and Underline Indicates the Sub-optimal Value)
Figure 8: SR- T curve: image matching success rate at different reprojection error thresholds
Figure 9: Visualization of matching results by different methods
Figure 10: Checkerboard visualization of the RRSI’s registration results
Figure 11: RMSE under different rotational angles
Figure 12: Visualization of matching results under different rotational angles
Figure 13: RMSE under different scale factors, where values exceeding 10 pixels are clipped to 10 pixels
Figure 14: Visualization of matching results under different scale factors s and rotational angles θ
Ablation Setting
RMSE/px
AUC/(%)
@3px
@5px
@10px
Cartesian Only
3.60
16.51
37.82
64.81
Log-Polar Only
3.72
15.34
36.19
62.97
Cartesian & Log-Polar
3.17
17.97
40.05
67.83
(the complete RRSI)
Table 2: Ablation Results of the DHRS Module on the OSdataset (Optical-SAR)
Ablation Setting
RMSE
AUC/(%)
/px
@3px
@5px
@10px
Baseline
3.48
16.87
38.27
65.36
Intra-Mod. Att.
3.41
17.42
39.07
66.26
Inter-Mod. Att.
3.25
17.74
39.45
66.90
Intra & Inter-Mod. Att.
3.17
17.97
40.05
67.83
(the complete RRSI)
Table 3: Ablation Results for the Joint Encoding of Geometric and Radiometric Relations on the OSdataset (Optical-SAR)
Ablation Setting
RMSE
AUC/(%)
/px
@3px
@5px
@10px
w/o Reconstruction
3.31
16.42
37.32
65.11
with Reconstruction
3.17
17.97
40.05
67.83
(the complete RRSI)
Table 4: Ablation Results of the Generative Reconstruction Constraint on the OSdataset (Optical-SAR)
Domain
RMSE
AUC/(%)
/px
@3px
@5px
@10px
Remote Sensing
1.27
37.78
54.00
76.33
Medical
2.67
17.78
39.33
68.33
Computer Vision
1.42
30.00
49.33
74.33
Table 5: Generalization Results for the RRSI Method on the MIMD dataset
Figure 15: Visual matching of the RRSI on the MIMD dataset
Cross-modal feature matching finds corresponding features across different data types or sensors despite differences in appearance, geometry, and viewpoint.
In multi-modal image registration, the primary challenge lies in shared structural information extraction. Compared to Transformers, Structured State Space Duality (SSD) offers greater global structural feature extraction with higher efficiency during training and inference. Inspired by these advantages, we propose a novel algorithm for multi-modal image registration, named RegNetMamba-2. Our algorithm incorporates SSD into coarse-to-fine matching process to extract local and global structural features effectively. Firstly, SSD is applied in three different scales for multi-modal feature extraction in our network. To strengthen local representation, we pay more attention on foreground edge and structural information by feature scaling function of SSD. Secondly, for shared feature extraction of input images and multi-modal feature fusion in all scales, we propose cross-modality feature fusion model based on SSD, consisting of Cross-Modality feature Interaction (CMI) module and Multi-Scale feature Fusion (MSF) module. CMI module is designed for cross-modality feature extraction of each scale by SSD in cross form. MSF module is designed to employ a progressive upward fusion in feature-level to obtain fine features, consisting of multi-modal features in all scales. Following coarse-to-fine, the features in 1/8 scale from CMI and 1/2 scale from MSF are collected to calculate matching probability scores. Then we respectively establish matching process by correspondences of pixel-wise. Extensive experiments demonstrate that comparing with state-of-the-art deep-learning based algorithms, RegNetMamba-2 has achieved good effects in both performance and efficiency for multi-modal image registration on the following datasets: VIS-SAR (OSDataset), VIS-IR (LGHD/RoadSence) and VIS-NIR (RGB-NIR sense).
Zhikang Li, Yan Wu, Xin Hu +2
Remote Sensing Image Processing and Fusion Group, School of Electronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China · National Key Laboratory of Radar Signal Processing, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China
Most advances in keypoint descriptions address monomodal settings, where image variations arise from viewpoint, illumination, or contrast changes. Multimodal scenarios involve images produced by fundamentally different sensing processes, such as multispectral imaging, RGB-depth, satellite imagery, or medical imaging, causing the same structures to appear differently. A common solution to cross-modal description is to train descriptors for each modality pair, which requires retraining whenever the modalities change, or to train large models, which incur a significant increase in runtime. Instead, we propose CrossFeat, a framework that enables an existing monomodal descriptor to operate across modalities. Our method learns a crossing function in descriptor space that maps features from one modality to a representation compatible with another. To preserve the structural information captured by the original descriptor, CrossFeat introduces a geometry-appearance disentanglement such that only appearance is altered while the geometric properties are preserved. Experiments across multiple domains and datasets demonstrate improved performance in multimodal matching.
Paul Schneider, Nazim Haouchine
Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA · Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Multimodal image registration is a fundamental task and a prerequisite for downstream cross-modal analysis. Despite recent progress in shared feature extraction and multi-scale architectures, two key limitations remain. First, some methods use disentanglement to learn shared features but mainly regularize the shared part, allowing modality-private cues to leak into the shared space. Second, most multi-scale frameworks support only a single transformation type, limiting their applicability when global misalignment and local deformation coexist. To address these issues, we formulate hybrid multimodal registration as jointly learning a stable shared feature space and a unified hybrid transformation. Based on this view, we propose HRNet, a Hybrid Registration Network that couples representation disentanglement with hybrid parameter prediction. A shared backbone with Modality-Specific Batch Normalization (MSBN) extracts multi-scale features, while a Cross-scale Disentanglement and Adaptive Projection (CDAP) module suppresses modality-private cues and projects shared features into a stable subspace for matching. Built on this shared space, a Hybrid Parameter Prediction Module (HPPM) performs non-iterative coarse-to-fine estimation of global rigid parameters and deformation fields, which are fused into a coherent deformation field. Extensive experiments on four multimodal datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on rigid and non-rigid registration tasks. The code is available at the project website.
Chunlei Zhang, Jiahao Xia, Yun Xiao +2
Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Australia · School of Artificial Intelligence, Anhui University, Hefei, China · School of Computer Science and Technology, Anhui University, Hefei, China