Phase-cycled randomized benchmarking of quantum processors: recovering hidden classical noise correlations
Organizations: Fandaqah, Al Khobar, Saudi Arabia · Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany · Argaam, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia · Fortanixor, United Arab Emirates
Abstract
Randomized benchmarking can hide classical temporal correlations because its Clifford-twirled response is even in the noise phase. For a stationary symmetric telegraph fluctuator, we show that continuous evolution and independent stationary resets at slot boundaries yield identical mean responses for arbitrary fixed idle modulations. We construct an eight-setting phase-cycle measurement of the connected sine-phase covariance under ideal Clifford twirling and classical idle dephasing. This observable vanishes for independent slot noise and fixed detuning without a weak-phase or Gaussian approximation. A closed telegraph response, independent circuit calculations and 800 simulation trials validate the construction and quantify the empirical coverage of a paired bootstrap estimator. A separate conservative confidence set states its finite-sample assumptions. Two acquisitions on an IBM processor compare engineered shared-sign and independently reset phases with identical marginals. Their primary contrasts are 0.254 and 0.211, with empirical 95% intervals [0.177, 0.331] and [0.136, 0.285], respectively; all negative-control intervals include zero. At equal shot and sensingwindow budgets, an ideal Ramsey/echo estimator is more precise in every tested class. The result supplies an explicit connection between a benchmarking identifiability limitation and a controlled correlation measurement. No native or quantum-memory detection is claimed.
Figures & tables
| Model | Detection | Bootstrap | Finite bound |
|---|---|---|---|
| coverage | coverage | ||
| Continuous RTN | 100.0 | 92.5 | 100.0 |
| Independent reset | 4.5 | 95.5 | 100.0 |
| Fixed detuning | 6.5 | 93.5 | 100.0 |
| Independent Gaussian | 5.5 | 94.5 | 100.0 |
| Model | RB | Ramsey/echo | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Continuous RTN | 0.0777 | 0.0269 | 2.89 |
| Independent reset | 0.0798 | 0.0432 | 1.85 |
| Fixed detuning | 0.0793 | 0.0188 | 4.22 |
| Independent Gaussian | 0.0824 | 0.0318 | 2.59 |
| Arm | Estimate | 95% interval |
| Acquisition 1 | ||
| Shared sign | 0.2580 | |
| Independent reset | 0.0040 | |
| Fixed detuning | 0.0456 | |
| No injection | 0.0416 | |
| Acquisition 2 | ||
Quantum System Identification
Quantum system identification infers a quantum device’s dynamics, parameters, and environmental noise from experimental measurements.
See all 14 papers