Physico-Geospatial Grounded Scene Interpretation for Mobile Robotics
Authors: Nicolas Schuler, Janik Kurtz, Lea Dewald, Marcel Sauber, Félicia Teferle, Jürgen Graf
Organizations: Department of Computer Science Trier University of Applied Sciences Trier, Germany · Department of Engineering University of Luxembourg Kirchberg, Luxembourg
Recent advancements in deep learning allow robotic agents to interact with dynamic and unstructured environments. Of special interest is the integration of physico-geospatial world knowledge into such systems, either by using physics-aware machine learning models, knowledge graphs to model relationships or spatio-temporal and logical reasoning. In the present work, we introduce an approach to augment the output of pre-trained, unmodified VLMs used for scene interpretation by integrating semantic descriptions, OpenStreetMap building data and street information with positional, temporal and metric information obtained from our sensory systems, fusing this information using LLMs. We apply this concept to an outdoor recording within a university campus, achieving an F1-Score of 0.83 in the task of grounding buildings and 0.64 for path surface grounding on our pilot evaluation set. The results demonstrate the conceptual capability of the proposed solution to deliver physico-geospatial grounded natural language descriptions. Code and results are available at https://datahub.rz.rptu.de/hstr-csrl-public/publications/physico-geospatial-grounded-scene-interpretation
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Different cognitive systems used within our laboratory . Unitree Go1 (top left), vehicle (bottom left), Unitree G1 (top and bottom mid), wheelchair (top right) and tripod (bottom right) with custom modular sensory system setups. Images partially taken from [ 41 ] .
Element
Comparison
Subset Accuracy
F1-Score
Buildings
OSM vs GT
0.56−0.08+0.08
0.83−0.04+0.04
OSM vs Detection
0.66−0.08+0.08
0.87−0.04+0.04
GT vs Detection
0.76−0.07+0.06
0.92−0.03+0.03
Paths
OSM vs GT
0.40−0.08+0.08
0.64−0.06+0.06
OSM vs Detection
0.53−0.08+0.08
0.69−0.06+0.06
GT vs Detection
0.80−0.07+0.07
0.90−0.04+0.04
TABLE I: Accuracy and F1-Score of the proposed solutions . For building and path identification as well as the utilized custom re-identification model. Values are given with 95% confidence intervals, indicated by superscript and subscript notation.
Error Type
Llama4:128x17b
Llama4:16x17b
Hallucination
0.00−0.00+0.03
0.04−0.02+0.04
Wrong Entities
0.13−0.05+0.07
0.15−0.05+0.07
Wrong Relations
0.02−0.01+0.04
0.03−0.02+0.04
Input Description Left Out
0.04−0.02+0.04
0.01−0.01+0.03
Not Included All Objects
0.02−0.01+0.04
0.09−0.04+0.06
Not Included All Buildings
0.09−0.04+0.06
0.12−0.04+0.06
TABLE II: LLM Error Statistic . Error prevalence of the evaluated categories. Values are given with 95% confidence intervals, indicated by superscript and subscript notation.
Attribute
Model
Cohen’s κ
Agreement
Hallucination
Llama4:128x17b
0.000000
0.971831
Llama4:16x17b
0.585401
0.97831
Wrong Entities
Llama4:128x17b
0.585081
0.880282
Llama4:16x17b
0.876950
0.964789
Wrong Relations
Llama4:128x17b
0.486438
0.971831
Llama4:16x17b
0.585401
0.971831
TABLE III: Annotation Reliability as inter-rater agreement measured by Cohen’s κ [ 50 ] and ‘Agreement’ as a ratio. Annotations of augmented descriptions compared to the baseline.
Fig. 2: Exemplary image from the evaluation data . Buildings O, N and L detected and identified by the pipeline, manually highlighted for clarity.
Robots deployed in human-centric environments routinely receive natural-language descriptions of spatial information ("I left my backpack on the table") that reference parts of the world beyond their perceptual field of view. Traditional metric-semantic mapping ignores this signal, while off-the-shelf multimodal models remain limited in 3D spatial reasoning and are not directly amenable to fusion with other sensor modalities. To convert language observations into a calibrated spatial distribution, we train a Language Sensor Model (LSM) that maps each utterance and its scene-graph context to a multimodal distribution, with mixture weights encoding referential ambiguity (e.g., which table) and component covariances encoding spatial uncertainty (e.g., where on the table the target lies). We then introduce VL-Map (Vision-Language Metric-Semantic Mapping), a probabilistic framework that treats these language predictions as stochastic observations and fuses them with onboard perception within a unified belief map. On the VLA-3D benchmark as well as on a real-world mobile robot, LSM is the only language predictor whose covariance estimates remain within the calibrated regime; fused into VL-Map, it leads to more accurate predictions of the target object location (about 70% more probability mass on the true target compared to the strongest foundation-model baseline). Project website: https://aryan-naveen.github.io/language-as-a-sensor/
Aryan Naveen, Jason Xinyu Liu, Luca Carlone +1
MIT Laboratory for Information & Decision Systems · MIT Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Robots collaborating with humans must convert natural language goals into actionable, physically grounded decisions. For example, executing a command such as "go two meters to the right of the fridge" requires grounding semantic references, spatial relations, and metric constraints within a 3D scene. While recent vision language models (VLMs) demonstrate strong semantic grounding capabilities, they are not explicitly designed to reason about metric constraints in physically defined spaces. In this work, we empirically demonstrate that state-of-the-art VLM-based grounding approaches struggle with complex metric-semantic language queries. To address this limitation, we propose MAPG (Multi-Agent Probabilistic Grounding), an agentic framework that decomposes language queries into structured subcomponents and queries a VLM to ground each component. MAPG then probabilistically composes these grounded outputs to produce metrically consistent, actionable decisions in 3D space. We evaluate MAPG on the HM-EQA benchmark and show consistent performance improvements over strong baselines. Furthermore, we introduce a new benchmark, MAPG-Bench, specifically designed to evaluate metric-semantic goal grounding, addressing a gap in existing language grounding evaluations. We also present a real-world robot demonstration showing that MAPG transfers beyond simulation when a structured scene representation is available.
Swagat Padhan, Lakshya Jain, Bhavya Minesh Shah +3
Vision-Language Models (VLMs) enable robots to follow open-language instructions. However, dense VLM embeddings have shown to be noisy and lack spatial consistency. This is problematic for robotic applications, which require simultaneous reasoning over semantics and 3D space. We examine spatial structure across recent VLMs and propose ReSiReg, a feature reconstruction method that uses spatially consistent VLM intermediates to improve dense language-grounded retrieval. ReSiReg clusters intermediates into visual prototypes, derives their language descriptors, and reconstructs each patch as a soft mixture of prototype-level language embeddings. We evaluate quantitatively on OVSS and 3D mapping across backbones, and qualitatively in real-world manipulation scenes. Quantitative results show improved dense retrieval; manipulation scenes show more spatially consistent target activations. We further provide a compact 25M dense VLM for robotic applications, substantially smaller than and competitive with ViT-B baselines. Available at https://resireg.github.io
Simon Schwaiger, David Seyser, Alessandro Scherl +2
Graz University of Technology, Institute of Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence · University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien, Department of Industrial Engineering · 1Graz University of Technology, Institute of Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence +2