cs.CVSep 9, 2026

How Much Velocity Does Off-Ball Space Value Need? A Broadcast-Viewport Benchmark

Authors: Seongjin Choi

Abstract

Velocity-aware pitch control is standard, but under a broadcast viewport half the players are off screen and on-screen velocities come from a drifting calibration. We ask at which layer of broadcast off-ball analysis velocity changes the answer. Inheriting our off-screen imputation protocol (three Metrica matches, 44 m viewport, block-bootstrap CIs), we score four velocity regimes -- none, viewport-legal observed, true-for-visible, true-for-all -- against a velocity-aware ground truth at three layers: imputation, the control surface, and team verdicts. Velocity is nearly useless for imputation (-0.2 pp against a 12--14 pp velocity-free surface MAE), first-order for the surface (-1.5 to -1.8 pp, 11--15% of that MAE), and ten times smaller for verdicts (-0.12 to -0.19 pp). The velocity that matters is the visible channel: perfect occluded-player velocity adds 2--6% of the visible gain, and no last-seen decay policy we tested exceeds that. Omitting velocity blurs the surface (per-frame |e| 2.2--2.6 pp) with small time-averaged bias (per cell <=0.4 pp), whereas imputation error is a structured bias against the defending team's deep zone (5--9 pp). At a fixed velocity window, a noise ladder of eleven jitter settings, including sigma_v-matched pairs, is ordered to first order by one velocity-noise axis sigma_v with break-even ~1 m/s; eleven SoccerNet-GSR clips from one match through our pipeline measure sigma_v=1.65 m/s yet recover 24--36% of the benefit: 43% of the variance is frame-common, which the surface tolerates, and the residual is heavy-tailed and clustered, which Gaussian controls matched on component RMS do not reproduce (+0.03 vs. +0.36). The share of velocity-free error that velocity removes grows with viewport width (7% at 36 m, 21% at 60 m): fix imputation on tight shots, velocity on wide ones. Code and logs are released.

Explore similar work

CardsList
Jul 13, 2026cs.CV

Training-Free Off-Screen Player Imputation for Broadcast-Based Spatial Football Analytics

Spatial football metrics such as pitch control assume access to the positions of all 22 players, yet the most widely available source of positional data -- the broadcast main camera -- shows only 10-16 of them at any moment. We quantify the resulting distortion with an open, reproducible benchmark: a simulated broadcast viewport applied to open full-pitch tracking data (Metrica Sports; three matches, one held out from method development). Ignoring off-screen players -- the visible-only baseline implied whenever a video-based game-state-reconstruction (GSR) pipeline adds no imputation layer -- inflates hidden-zone pitch-control error to 25.1-26.9 percentage points and a mean absolute control-share error of 11.1-13.4 points across the three matches. We then evaluate a ladder of training-free, online imputation baselines that use only observations from the match being analysed. The best overall on these decision-relevant metrics, role-anchored centroid voting (each visible player votes for the full-team centroid by subtracting its running role offset, attenuating the viewport-induced subset bias), roughly halves hidden-zone error (to 12.2-13.8 points) and cuts control-share error to 28-48% of the ignore policy at every viewport width from 36 m to 60 m in all three matches. For occlusions <=9.6 s -- the regime of the closest learned prior work -- it reaches binwise median position errors of 3.3-8.9 m; but 50-57% of hidden-player observations lie beyond that regime. Integrated end-to-end into a broadcast-video GSR pipeline, imputation moves a downstream possession-quality score (Space-Creation Index) by 15.6 and 17.2 points on two real World Cup broadcast windows, flipping the verdict class in one.
Seongjin Choi
Sports AnalyticsImputationControllability
AskPDF
May 27, 2026cs.CV

Automated Estimation of Impact Time, Impact Location, and Shuttlecock Speed in Badminton Smashes Using Event Cameras

Quantifying impact phenomena in badminton smashes is important for evaluating both athletic performance and equipment; however, conventional measurement systems involve trade-offs between temporal resolution, data efficiency, and preparation effort. This study proposes a measurement method using two synchronized event cameras to automatically estimate impact time, impact location on the racket face, and post-impact shuttlecock speed in an integrated manner within the same trial. The swing interval was detected from event rate statistics, impact time was estimated from the shuttlecock trajectory inflection in the lateral-view event data, impact location was determined by ellipse fitting to the racket face in the rear-view event image, and shuttlecock speed was calculated in the sagittal plane. To validate the proposed method, Bland-Altman analysis was performed against a high-speed camera-based reference method using 125 smash trials from five players. Impact time and shuttlecock speed were estimated in all 124 analyzable trials, and impact location was estimated in 93.5% (116/124). The bias (95% CI) for impact time, medio-lateral impact location, longitudinal impact location, and shuttlecock speed were 1.84 ms (1.45 to 2.23), 3.45 mm (2.18 to 4.72), -1.92 mm (-2.97 to -0.88), and -1.00 m/s (-2.46 to 0.46), respectively. No proportional bias was observed for any metric. These results suggest that the proposed method can serve as a useful tool for integrated assessment of badminton smash performance and equipment in practical settings.
Yudai Washida, Yuto Kase, Kai Ishibe +2
Table Tennis RobotMeasuresEstimatorsLongitudinal
AskPDF
May 25, 2026cs.CV

Event-based Batting Impact Estimation

Estimating the precise timing of batting impact is crucial for understanding the rapid sensorimotor control. However, this task is challenging for RGB cameras due to insufficient temporal resolution and motion blur. Similarly, Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) are impractical for actual matches due to sensor intrusiveness and their limited temporal precision. To overcome these limitations, we propose a novel framework leveraging event-based cameras, which offer microsecond resolution and high dynamic range, to estimate impact timing based on the weighted centroid distance between the detected ball and bat. To address the domain gap between event frames and RGB images that degrades segmentation accuracy, we generate high-density event frames. We then introduce a mask refinement network that leverages these frames and bidirectional mask information, optimized using a novel loss function. Experiments on real-world datasets demonstrate that our method achieves superior accuracy under challenging conditions, including low-light environments and severe occlusions, outperforming baselines by reducing the Mean Absolute Error by approximately 63%.
Ryotaro Ishida, Wataru Ikeda, Ryosei Hara +3
CameraInertial Measurement UnitsMotion BlurSensorimotor Experience
AskPDF