Organizations: Wangxuan Institute of Computer Technology, Peking University, Beijing, China · Institute of Software Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China · University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning (MCIT) aims to exploit the incrementally accumulated knowledge to process multimodal inputs of diverse tasks, where parameter routing plays an important role. State-of-the-art methods rely on sample-to-task center similarity and cross-modal fusion with equal weight during routing. However, such solutions face two fundamental flaws: (1) Within each modality, the sample-to-task center distance is sub-optimal for routing since the abundant intra-task diversity information is underleveraged. (2) Different modalities exhibit varying reliability across tasks, where the modality with inter-task ambiguity can easily misguide the routing result. To address these problems, we propose Hyperbolic Uncertainty-aware Modality-Balanced Routing (Hyper-LLaVA) to improve parameter routing capacity based on cross-modality task feature uncertainty modeling. Specifically, to improve intra-modality task matching, Hyper-LLaVA accesses the sample-to-task distribution similarity in the Hyperbolic space. Besides, to alleviate the degradation brought by unreliable modalities, Hyper-LLaVA quantifies the task matching ambiguity within each modality to achieve adaptive balancing between task matching across modalities. Based on the complementary intra- and inter-modality task matching enhancement, our Hyper-LLaVA outperforms state-of-the-art approaches by large margins. Our source code is available at https://github.com/zhoujiahuan1991/ICML2026-Hyper-LLaVA
Figures & tables
Figure 1: (a) Within different modalities, the task feature regions may be ambiguous or distinct. The ambiguous task feature regions can often result in high erroneous task matching scores. and distinct task feature distribution may also generate low correct task matching scores. (b) Existing methods are vulnerable to erroneous task matching scores due to simply averaging the dual-modality predictions. (c) Our method aims to seek an adaptive balance between modalities to generate reliable task selection.
Figure 2: The overview of our proposed Hyper-LLaVA framework. The process consists of two stages: (Left) The Training Stage , comprising (a) standard instruction tuning with task-specific LoRA experts and (b) a Task-aware Modality Reliability Estimation module. This module quantifies task separability via Bhattacharyya Distance ( DBC ) to derive adaptive modality weights ( ωv,ωt ). (Right) The Inference Stage , specifically (c) the Hyperbolic Uncertainty-aware Modality-Balanced Routing. We map features into the Poincaré ball to capture task uncertainty and fuse modality similarities ( Sv,St ) using the learned weights for precise expert selection.
Accuracy on Each Task (%)
Aggregate Results (%)
Method
Venue
SQA
TVQA
ImgNet
GQA
VizWiz
Gron
VQAv2
OVQA
MFN ↑
MAA ↑
MFT ↑
BWT ↑
Zero-shot
-
49.91
2.88
0.33
2.08
0.90
0.00
0.68
0.17
7.12
-
-
-
Multi-task
-
56.77
49.35
95.55
56.65
53.90
30.09
59.50
55.65
57.18
-
-
-
LwF
TPAMI 2017
74.45
49.70
39.30
52.00
50.45
7.05
62.25
47.80
47.88
59.71
68.13
-20.26
EWC
NAS 2017
75.20
55.36
67.50
54.70
52.90
15.40
64.45
35.05
52.57
61.63
65.59
-13.02
O-LoRA
CVPR 2023
76.90
42.65
15.85
40.25
45.10
0.30
54.35
54.00
41.18
56.28
56.99
-15.82
Table 1: Comparison of the proposed Hyper-LLaVA method with existing approaches in CoIN Benchmark.
Accuracy on Each Task (%)
Aggregate Results (%)
Method
Venue
ImgNetR
ArxivQA
VizWiz
IconQA
CLEVR
Flickr
MFN ↑
MAA ↑
MFT ↑
BWT ↑
Zero-shot
-
16.27
53.73
38.39
19.20
20.63
41.88
31.68
-
-
-
Multi-task
-
91.67
90.83
57.87
78.43
76.63
61.72
76.19
-
-
-
LwF
TPAMI 2017
40.27
75.93
42.76
44.38
37.43
56.34
49.52
-
-
-
EWC
NAS 2017
39.05
77.88
43.24
45.33
39.72
55.94
50.20
-
-
-
O-LoRA
CVPR 2023
77.50
78.07
44.50
63.13
64.73
58.16
64.35
78.02
76.01
-13.99
Table 2: Comparison of the proposed Hyper-LLaVA method with existing approaches in UCIT Benchmark.
Metric Space
Fusion Strategy
MFN (%)
Euclidean
Static
56.75
Poincaré
Static
62.67 (+5.92)
Euclidean
Adaptive
66.42 (+9.67)
Poincaré
Adaptive (Ours)
66.62 (+9.87)
Table 3: Ablation study on the effectiveness of Hyperbolic Metric and Adaptive Fusion (metric: MFN).
Figure 3: Ablation study on modality fusion strategies.
Figure 4: Ablation study on modality fusion strategies (a), Task feature distributions in the Poincaré ball (b) and (c).
Figure 5: Visualization of model predictions across different tasks in comparison with state-of-the-art Hide ( Guo et al., 2025 ) .
Appendix figures & tables4 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Figure 6: Log-scale Inter-task Relevance Matrices on CoIN Benchmark
Figure 7: Log-scale Inter-task Relevance Matrices on UCIT Benchmark
Figure 8: Evolution of Task-aware Modality Weight
Figure 9: Visualization of model predictions across different tasks in comparison with state-of-the-art Hide ( Guo et al., 2025 ) .
Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning (MCIT) enables multimodal large language models to acquire new tasks sequentially while retaining previously learned capabilities. Many recent methods maintain task-specific LoRA experts and route each input to one or more experts at inference. Yet the task-identification problem underlying expert routing remains under-explored. We show that routing is nearly saturated on widely used MCIT benchmarks. Textual fingerprints that leak task identity and short 4--10-task sequences with few competing experts jointly obscure the long-horizon routing problem. To expose this challenge, we introduce FLEX (Fingerprint-reduced Long-horizon Expert eXamination), a 34-task long-horizon MCIT benchmark with weakened textual fingerprints. FLEX groups tasks with similar instruction and answer formats but diverse visual and knowledge domains, normalizes their outer templates, and evaluates routing over a substantially larger expert pool. Crucially, we formulate progressive-LoRA routing as soft task-as-class Multimodal Class-Incremental Learning (MCIL): each task defines an incremental routing class, whose complete score distribution supplies the LoRA mixture weights, with hard routing as a discrete special case. FLEX exposes this expanding task-identification challenge, while the MCIL formulation provides a principled interface for transferring CIL methods to expert routing. We instantiate PureLoRA as a controlled baseline and adapt four CIL methods to four MCIT frameworks without modifying their LoRA experts or generation pipelines. Our plug-in routers improve strict LoRA matching by up to 16.3 percentage points and overall MacroScore by up to 4.6 points. Code is available at: https://github.com/RINC-CL/FLEX
Huiyu Yi, Yongqi Xu, Bogang Zhang +5
School of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, China · National Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, China
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) unify heterogeneous vision-language tasks under a shared generative framework via instruction tuning, yet real-world deployment demands continuous capability expansion, making Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning (MCIT) essential. Existing methods either update all tasks with a shared parameter set or allocate dedicated modules for each new task. Shared updates force heterogeneous tasks to compete, causing forgetting of learned capabilities. Conversely, isolated expansion prevents interference but severely limits parameter efficiency over long task streams. To address this dilemma, we propose CRAM. Specifically, by isolating task-specific patterns into independent modules, CRAM mitigates catastrophic forgetting across tasks. To further boost parameter efficiency, we utilize adaptive-rank instantiation to identify the capability gap between existing expert capability and new task demands, and dynamically allocate only the necessary parameters. To ensure stable reuse among tasks, centroid-guided routing recognizes and activates existing experts' capabilities, while an orthogonality penalty confines new updates to task-specific directions, preventing re-learning general capability. Extensive experiments across diverse benchmarks consistently demonstrate its superiority over existing methods.
Jun-Tao Tang, Zhen-Hao Xie, Yu-Cheng Shi +1
School of Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, China · State Key Laboratory of Novel Software Technology, Nanjing University, China
Multimodal Continual Instruction Tuning (MCIT) is essential for sequential task adaptation of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) but is severely restricted by catastrophic forgetting. While existing literature focuses on the reasoning language backbone, in this work, we expose a critical yet neglected dual-forgetting phenomenon across both perception drift in Cross-modal Projection Space and reasoning collapse in Low-rank Parameter Space. To resolve this, we present MAny (Merge Anything), a framework that merges task-specific knowledge through Cross-modal Projection Merging (CPM) and Low-rank Parameter Merging (LPM). Specifically, CPM recovers perceptual alignment by adaptively merging cross-modal visual representations via visual-prototype guidance, ensuring accurate feature recovery during inference. Simultaneously, LPM eliminates mutual interference among task-specific low-rank modules by recursively merging low-rank weight matrices. By leveraging recursive least squares, LPM provides a closed-form solution that mathematically guarantees an optimal fusion trajectory for reasoning stability. Notably, MAny operates as a training-free paradigm that achieves knowledge merging via efficient CPU-based algebraic operations, eliminating additional gradient-based optimization beyond initial tuning. Our extensive evaluations confirm the superior performance and robustness of MAny across multiple MLLMs and benchmarks. Specifically, on the UCIT benchmark, MAny achieves significant leads of up to 8.57% and 2.85% in final average accuracy over state-of-the-art methods across two different MLLMs, respectively.
Zijian Gao, Wangwang Jia, Xingxing Zhang +6
College of Computer Science and Technology, National University of Defense Technology · State Key Laboratory of Complex & Critical Software Environment · National Key Laboratory of Parallel and Distributed Computing, National University of Defense Technology +1