Measuring the Cost of Variety Conflation in Multilingual MT Evaluation: Adding Mozambican Xichangana, Nyanja and Sena to FLORES+

In minoritized (low-resource) language technologies, a common response to data sparsity is to aggregate text across multiple varieties and treat the combined data as a single corpus. However, mixed corpora of closely related indigenous variants can produce an artificial register that is accountable to no single speaker community, a structural failure we call variant fragmentation. This issue is acute for minoritized languages native to Mexico, such as Nawatl. Building on a 70,000-pair multi-variant foundation, we specialize an mT5-large checkpoint to Masewalkopa (nhn), the Nawatl variety spoken in Santa Ana Tlacotenco. We curate 2,665 parallel pairs, reserve all sentence-level data for evaluation, and incorporate 192 elder-transcribed target sentences via asymmetric backtranslation. A custom finite-state analyzer reduces unanalyzed surface forms from 82.0% to 19.9% and supplies functional syntax tags as plain-text prefixes, allowing the model to reuse existing subword embeddings rather than relying on frozen special tokens. The resulting LoRA-v9c-b model achieves 58.46 dev chrF++ and 58.20/57.90 directional test chrF++. Finally, CTranslate2 int8 quantization reduces CPU latency from 137.5 to 1.8-2.6 seconds per request, enabling cost-bounded Cloud Run deployment.

Multilingual translation benchmarks are typically sourced in English and translated into other languages, treating language pairs as the unit of evaluation---a design that is prone to contamination over time and overlooks locale and cultural considerations. We therefore advocate for source-contrastive evaluation and instantiate it with Cultivar, a localised subset of FLORES, which enables locale-specific translation evaluation. When paired with unlocalised counterparts, performance discrepancy allows the probing of data contamination and localisation robustness. We benchmark 32 open-weight models and find that MT-specialised models are less robust, a few models potentially overfit FLORES, and models tend to translate US content better than that of other locales, regardless of language.

Multilingual neural machine translation models such as NLLB-200 cover 200 languages but leave thousands unsupported, including most Grassfields Bantu languages of Cameroon. When fine-tuning these models for an unseen language, practitioners must choose a proxy language token, yet no principled method exists for this selection. We implemented an embedding initialization strategy where a language token is the average of embeddings from multiple typologically related languages already in the mod el. We evaluate this approach on Limbum-to-English translation using a parallel corpus of 8,837 sentence pairs from New Testament text and a bilingual dictionary. We compare models: NLLB-200 zero-shot (chrF2++ = 12.5), a Transformer trained from scratch (chrF2++ = 14.5), NLLB-200 fine-tuned with a Swahili proxy token (chrF2++ = 47.3), and NLLB-200 with our averaged embedding initialization (chrF2++ = 46.7). We find that the multi-language initialization achieves performance comparable to the best single-language proxy. Both NLLB-200 variants improve over the from-scratch baseline by over 32 chrF2++ points. These results show that multilingual transfer is the dominant factor in extremely low-resource Bantu translation while eliminating the need for heuristic proxy selection. However, all systems fail to preserve tonal diacritics, highlighting an open challenge. We make our dataset and code available to support further research.