Riemannian ascent--descent for nonconvex nonconcave minimax landscapes: convergence to basin saddle points and applications to distributionally robust optimization
Authors: Rishabh Dixit, Pranav Upadrashta, Alex Cloninger
Organizations: Department of Mathematics, UC San Diego · Department of Mathematics and Halıcıoglu Data Science Institute, UC San Diego
We study a class of distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problems for the statistical risk problem, formulated as minimax problems over the product of a Euclidean space and a Riemannian manifold. Because the resulting minimax landscape is nonconvex nonconcave in general, no globally convergent first order method is known to be available. We instead introduce the notion of a basin saddle point, a Nash equilibrium defined locally on the Cartesian product of a δ basin around a connected component of the local minima critical set and a geodesic ball on the measure manifold. We develop an abstract convergence framework for a Riemannian gradient ascent multistep descent iteration to a basin saddle point under a local Łojasiewicz type growth condition, with exponent β∈(1,2], in the δ basin around connected components of the local minima critical sets. Under Lipschitz regularity of critical sets we establish linear convergence for β=2 and polynomial convergence for β∈(1,2) to a basin saddle point, with explicit dependence on the sectional curvature of the manifold. We then instantiate this framework for the statistical risk DRO problem over Gaussian measures, where the ambiguity set is naturally modeled as the product of Euclidean space and the Bures Wasserstein manifold of covariance matrices, which we relax to a penalized DRO formulation. We derive nonasymptotic Hessian estimates for the resulting Lagrangian, establish existence and local uniqueness of its maximizer, and prove that an alternating Riemannian gradient scheme converges to a basin saddle point of the penalized DRO problem, recovering the linear and polynomial rates of the abstract theory with all constants explicit in terms of data dimension, loss moments, and the reference covariance.
Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) is widely used for decision-making under uncertainty, but its adversarial focus on worst-case loss can lead to overly conservative policies. To mitigate this, we study ex-ante Distributionally Robust Regret Optimization (DRRO) with Wasserstein ambiguity sets, designed to balance robustness with upside potential. We develop a theory of Wasserstein DRRO (WDRRO) paralleling Wasserstein DRO. Under smoothness and regularity, WDRRO selects among ERM optima by a first-order gradient-discrepancy rule. If the ERM optimizer is unique, first-order sensitivity vanishes and a second-order expansion governs deviations. For convex quadratics ERM and DRRO coincide for any radius. We then study regimes where these assumptions fail: nondifferentiable max-affine losses, discrete references, and larger radii, where WDRRO can differ from ERM and WDRO. We show that computing WDRRO regret is NP-hard even without bilinear terms. Nevertheless, we develop exact algorithms, a tractable convex relaxation with guarantees, and experiments showing tightness and loss-dependent behavior.
Lukas-Benedikt Fiechtner, Jose Blanchet
Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering Stanford University · Institute of Computational and Mathematical Engineering Department of Management Science and Engineering Stanford University
We study a class of stochastic nonsmooth optimization problems in which an outer variable minimizes the expectation of a pointwise maximum. This minimization--expectation--maximization (minEmax) problem arises in Wasserstein distributionally robust optimization and adversarially robust training, and it cannot in general be reformulated as a finite-dimensional minimax problem when the underlying distribution is not empirical. We propose a stochastic smoothing proximal gradient method based on log-mean-exp smoothing of the value function. Under compactness and Lipschitz-type assumptions, we present nonasymptotic analysis in terms of Goldstein stationarity and show that every almost-sure cluster point generated by our method is a Clarke stationary point; by Clarke regularity, such a point is also directional stationary for the original problem. Numerical experiments on newsvendor, robust regression, and adversarially robust learning problems show that the proposed method is competitive with existing baselines.
Wei Liu, Muhammad Khan, Gabriel Mancino-Ball +1
Department of Applied Mathematics, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China · Institute for Math & AI, Wuhan (IMAI), Wuhan university, China · Department of Mathematical Sciences Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA
We study distributionally robust online learning, where a risk-averse learner updates decisions sequentially to guard against worst-case distributions drawn from a Wasserstein ambiguity set centered at past observations. While this paradigm is well understood in the offline setting through Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Optimization (DRO), its online extension poses significant challenges in convergence. In this paper, we formulate the problem as an online saddle-point stochastic game between a decision maker and an adversary selecting worst-case distributions, and propose a general framework that converges to a robust Nash equilibrium coinciding with the solution of the corresponding offline Wasserstein DRO problem.