Can changing only the language instruction redirect a VLA policy's end effector, or does the visually driven motion prior dominate? We present Atomic Motion Coordinate, a geometry-grounded coordinate for steerable and force-responsive manipulation. Each arm owns thirteen signed translation, rotation, and hold atoms grounded from text and forward kinematics with vision withheld, and the coordinate is injected into every action-expert block via weighted codebook alignment. Contact history modulates the same coordinate through a bounded spherical residual that is recomputed from a fixed nominal latent to regenerate only the unexecuted horizon suffix. Across 7,520 offline horizon interventions, opposite-atom separation reaches 92.5/83.1% (single/dual) versus 39.1/24.0% for LA4VLA-style. Across 50 real-robot trials per task, AMC raises OOD fruit progress from 60.5% to 87.8%; force adaptation raises Plug/Vase from 59.0/71.5% to 78.5/75.2%.
Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models are increasingly expected to not only complete robot tasks, but also follow human instructions about how those tasks should be executed. However, existing robot datasets usually pair trajectories with coarse goal-level language, leaving execution-critical details such as active arm, approach direction, and contact region unspecified. This limits steerable policy learning and robotic video understanding. We introduce FineVLA, an open framework for action-aligned fine-grained VLA supervision. The framework includes: (1) a data construction tool that unifies 972,247 trajectories across 85K tasks from 10 open-source robot datasets and builds FineVLA-Data, a human-verified dataset of 47,159 fine-grained trajectories; (2) a held-out benchmark with 500 videos, 11,631 atomic facts, and 1,030 VQA questions; (3) a robotics-specialized VLM annotator for scalable fine-grained annotation; and (4) a steerable VLA policy trained with controlled mixtures of fine-grained and raw goal-level instructions. Our experiments yield three findings. First, fine-grained supervision does not sacrifice goal-level success: FG-only improves over Raw-only by +1.4 to +8.1 success-rate points across settings. Second, fine-grained and raw instructions are complementary, following a consistent inverted-U trend peaking at FG:Raw = 1:2 to 1:1. The best mixed setting reaches 86.8%/82.5% in RoboTwin simulation and 62.7/100 in real-world dual-arm manipulation (vs. 49.9 Raw-only). Third, fine-grained supervision improves steerable control: the largest real-world gains appear on pose (+23), color (+18), and approach direction (+18)--factors where goal-level instructions provide no guidance. Overall, fine-grained language should augment goal-level instructions: specifying how to execute alongside what to achieve. Project page: https://finevla.xlang.ai/
Vision-language-action (VLA) models increasingly condition robot policies on history, depth, or 4D features to resolve ambiguity in long-horizon manipulation. However, more spatiotemporal evidence is not necessarily better: when the injected evidence is not motion-consistent, it can introduce geometric drift, fragmented temporal cues, and unstable action generation. This raises a simple question: should a VLA remember past frames, or remember the motion that connects them? We introduce MotionVLA, a motion-history interface that converts a short past-only video window into compact, time-continuous trajectory-field tokens. Instead of treating history as a sparse set of ndependently lifted frames, MotionVLA represents recent observations as physically coherent motion evidence. Current visual tokens query this history to retrieve task-relevant motion information, which is then recoupled into the VLA stream under trajectory-grounded supervision. Experiments across simulation benchmarks and preliminary real-robot rollouts show that MotionVLA improves long-horizon manipulation while producing smoother and more direct executions. These results suggest that effective VLA memory is not just about providing more 4D context, but about exposing motion-consistent evidence that is usable for control.
Contact-rich manipulation, requiring robots to regulate not only motion but also how they yield to external forces, has emerged as the next frontier for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models. However, existing VLAs output purely kinematic commands, degrading performance on real-world contact-rich tasks. In this paper, we introduce CompVLA, a unified VLA framework that jointly predicts motion and stiffness matrix from RGB and language inputs. Our approach augments the conventional architecture with a dedicated Compliance Expert, which outputs time-varying stiffness and virtual displacement profiles executed via geometric impedance control. We demonstrate that CompVLA achieves the highest average success rate across diverse contact-rich tasks, outperforming both vanilla and compliance-aware VLA baselines, with ablations confirming each component is essential.