Robots operating in cluttered environments must often manipulate objects whose locations are only partially observable. A central challenge is deciding whether to acquire another observation or to first manipulate objects that may occlude the target. Conventional task and motion planning (TAMP) approaches typically make this decision using symbolic action costs or expensive geometric planning, neither of which adequately captures how likely an observation is to reveal an occluded target. We introduce Imagine-TAMP, an interleaved planning and execution framework that uses semantic and geometric imagination to compare alternative task-level strategies under partial observability before committing to expensive motion planning. A vision-language model shapes a particle belief over target locations using commonsense relationships between the target and visible objects, while a generative scene model estimates plausible geometry in unobserved regions. Given a target hypothesis and imagined scene, Imagine-TAMP generates multiple symbolic plan skeletons and assigns non-unit costs that approximate both manipulation effort and target visibility from sensing actions, distinguishing a short but poorly informative observation strategy from a longer strategy that first manipulates an occluder to better expose the target. The selected skeleton is then refined into a feasible continuous plan and executed, with new observations updating the belief and triggering replanning when necessary. Experiments show that imagination-guided evaluation improves observation-versus-manipulation decisions: in viewpoint-constrained shelf scenes, non-unit geometric evaluation increases success from 46.0% to 84.0%, while semantic belief shaping further reduces manipulation and replanning. On a real robot, the complete system reduces planning time by 32% relative to a geometry-only ablation.
Relational object rearrangement (ROR) tasks (e.g., insert flower to vase) require a robot to manipulate objects with precise semantic and geometric reasoning. Existing approaches either rely on pre-collected demonstrations that struggle to capture complex geometric constraints or generate goal-state observations to capture semantic and geometric knowledge, but fail to explicitly couple object transformation with action prediction, resulting in errors due to generative noise. To address these limitations, we propose Imagine2Act, a 3D imitation-learning framework that incorporates semantic and geometric constraints of objects into policy learning to tackle high-precision manipulation tasks. We first generate imagined goal images conditioned on language instructions and reconstruct corresponding 3D point clouds to provide robust semantic and geometric priors. These imagined goal point clouds serve as additional inputs to the policy model, while an object-action consistency strategy with soft pose supervision explicitly aligns predicted end-effector motion with generated object transformation. This design enables Imagine2Act to reason about semantic and geometric relationships between objects and predict accurate actions across diverse tasks. Experiments in both simulation and the real world demonstrate that Imagine2Act outperforms previous state-of-the-art policies. More visualizations can be found at https://sites.google.com/view/imagine2act.
Task-oriented grasping (TOG) requires robots to grasp functional parts of objects (e.g., the handle of a mug for pouring), yet these affordance regions are frequently occluded in cluttered scenes. Active perception via next-best-view (NBV) planning can resolve such occlusions by moving the camera for more informative observations. However, existing NBV methods typically optimize viewpoints for grasping the target object as a whole without distinguishing which part is task-relevant. A naive adaptation, fully scanning the target object before predicting the affordance, wastes most of the viewpoint budget on task-irrelevant surfaces (e.g., the mug body for pouring). To address this, we propose ATAP, an Affordance-Targeted Active Perception framework that shifts viewpoint planning from exhaustive target scanning to targeted affordance verification. ATAP hypothesizes the occluded target geometry via a generative shape prior and predicts the affordance distribution over the imagined complete surface. In cluttered scenes, severe occlusion can make the location of the hidden affordance ambiguous, leaving multiple locations plausible given the partial observation. ATAP therefore introduces an uncertainty-aware viewpoint planner that jointly optimizes expected entropy reduction over these competing hypotheses and expected affordance verification gain from real observations. This process iterates until the affordance is sufficiently verified for grasp execution. Experiments in simulation and real-world cluttered scenes show that ATAP substantially improves the functional grasp success rate over fixed-view TOG baselines, and outperforms reconstruction-based active perception with over 57% fewer NBV steps.
Humans combine reasoning and motor control to solve complex manipulation tasks under diverse constraints. They build an understanding of the physical world that helps them convert reasoning into actions and quickly adapt to new scenes, tasks, and rules. We refer to this capability as intuitive manipulation. Existing benchmarks fail to capture this integration: they evaluate physical reasoning in isolation from execution, or measure policy performance without requiring explicit reasoning. We introduce IMBENCH, a benchmark designed to evaluate intuitive manipulation as an integrated capability spanning perception, physical reasoning, action generation, and iterative execution. Our tasks require models to infer task-relevant physical structure and generate feasible action sequences under explicit constraints, including contact-rich manipulation, tool use, and multi-stage dependencies. We introduce a benchmark of 35 tasks, 14K filtered trajectories, and scalable tools for generating diverse scenarios. Experiments reveal a consistent gap: vision language models show partial physical reasoning ability but fail to produce executable plans, while state-of-the-art vision-language-action models struggle to satisfy task constraints and generalize across scenarios. These results identify intuitive manipulation as a missing axis in current foundation models and generalist robot policies, and position IMBENCH as a step toward evaluating and enabling more integrated, adaptive physical intelligence.