LunaDrive: A Delay-Compensated High-Voltage GaN FET-Based Motor Driver for Dynamic Robots with Flat BLDC Motors
Authors: Sota Yuzaki, Temma Suzuki, Hiromi Tada, Masanori Konishi, Kento Kawaharazuka, Kei Okada
Organizations: Department of Mechano-Informatics, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan
The performance improvement of high-power flat BLDC motors has accelerated the development of dynamic robots. However, many commercially available servo motors assume operating voltages of 48 V or lower, which limits the maximum rotational speed. Dynamic robots require rapid energy generation, so this voltage constraint restricts motion performance. Therefore, driving motors beyond the rated voltage is desirable to increase the instantaneous maximum speed. On the other hand, semiconductor devices used in motor drivers have a trade-off between voltage rating and current capacity. Conventional drivers using Si MOSFETs have difficulty achieving both high-voltage and high-current operation. Although GaN FETs are promising, compact drivers that can be mounted on the rear side of flat BLDC motors remain limited. In this study, a motor driver for high-power flat BLDC motors using GaN FETs is developed. The effect of delay compensation in the high-speed region beyond the rated operating range is also investigated. In the experiments, under 96 V operation, a continuous current of 30 A was achieved with a heat sink attached. A peak current of 80 A and a maximum electrical frequency of 3110 Hz were confirmed. A high-speed load lifting experiment driven by a LiPo battery 24S (100 V) was also conducted, demonstrating applicability to dynamic robot operation.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: LunaDrive enabling high-voltage, high-speed operation for dynamic robots
Fig. 2: LunaDrive composed of two boards: a controller board and a driver board
Fig. 3: Electronic block diagram of LunaDrive
Fig. 4: Schematic of GaN FET-based half-bridge circuit
Device
Type
On-Resistance
Size
[ m\SIUnitSymbolOhm ]
[ mm2 ]
FET-1
GaN FET
3
15
FET-2
MOSFET
2.5
116
FET-3
MOSFET
5.6
30
TABLE I: Performance comparison of 150-V power FETs
Manufacturer
Part Number
Nominal Cap.
Retention (DC Bias)
Rated Volt.
Package Size
Height
Areal Cap.
[ \SIUnitSymbolMicroF ]
[%]
[ V ]
[ mm ]
[ \SIUnitSymbolMicroFmm−2 ]
Murata
GRM32EC72A106KE05
10
25.1
100
3225M
2.5
0.078
TDK
C5750X7S2A226M280KB
22
45.5
100
5750M
3.1
0.088
TDK
CAA572X7S2A336M640LJ
33
47.0
100
6050M
6.9
0.129
TDK
C3225X7T2E334K200AA
0.33
69.3
250
3225M
2.0
0.029
TDK
C5750X7T2E225K250KA
2.2
58.5
250
5750M
2.5
0.045
TABLE II: Selected high-areal-capacitance MLCCs across package form factors and voltage ratings evaluated under practical DC bias conditions
Manufacturer
Part Number
Nominal Cap.
Rated Volt.
Package Size
Height
Quantity
[ \SIUnitSymbolMicroF ]
[ V ]
[ mm ]
[-]
Murata
GRM32EC72A106KE05
10
100
3225M
2.5
76
TDK
C2012X7T2E104K125AA
0.1
250
2012M
1.25
18
TDK
CGA4J3X7R2E223K125AE
0.022
250
2012M
1.25
12
TABLE III: Capacitors mounted on the power supply line of LunaDrive
Fig. 5: Control block diagram of LunaDrive with delay compensation
Fig. 6: Overall system configuration
Fig. 7: High-power wire module using LunaDrive
Name
Value
Rated Voltage
48V
No Load Speed
5040rpm
Rated Torque
1.3Nm
Peak Torque
4Nm
Pole Pairs
21
TABLE IV: RO80 Frameless BLDC Motor Specifications
Fig. 8: Two types of heat sinks
Fig. 9: Switching waveform of drain-to-source voltage at 10 A motor current
Voltage
Delay Compensation
Speed
Electrical Frequency
[V]
[rpm]
[Hz]
48
Disabled
4340
1520
48
Enabled
4340
1520
96
Disabled
5760
2020
96
Enabled
8890
3110
TABLE V: Results of the High-Speed Operation Experiment
Fig. 10: Current and speed responses at 96 V with and without delay compensation
Figure 16
Fig. 13: Current and board temperature when 80A is commanded
Fig. 14: Temperature rise over time at different continuous current levels
Fig. 15: Overview of the high-speed load lifting experiment. The sequential snapshots show the lifting motion at 100 V.
Fig. 16: Current and speed responses during high-speed load lifting at 50 V and 100 V
Accurate dynamics modeling of Brushless DC (BLDC) motors is fundamental to high-performance robotic joint control. This paper presents a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) with a deep residual (ResNet) backbone that learns a continuous-time surrogate of the full six-state BLDC motor dynamics. Given simulation time, applied three-phase voltages, and excitation parameters as inputs, the network directly predicts all motor state variables -- rotor angle, angular velocity, three-phase currents, and winding temperature -- while simultaneously satisfying the governing electromechanical and thermal ODEs through a composite physics-data loss. A curriculum scheduling strategy gradually activates the physics penalty to prevent premature convergence. Training runs are completed in under two minutes on a standard CPU. Crucially, once trained, PINN inference achieves latencies of 0.1--22, mu s per query, up to 118x faster than conventional ODE solvers, making it suitable for real-time observer and control applications.
Haitham El-Hussieny
Department of Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering, Egypt-Japan University of Science and Technology (E-JUST), New Burg El-Arab City, Alexandria, Egypt
Agile flight tasks such as drone racing and pursuit-evasion require strong acceleration and precise turns, but the available thrust changes as the battery discharges and voltage drops under load. Conservative command limits make this variation easier to tolerate, at the cost of unused performance. We investigate how learned controllers can use that additional thrust while retaining the flight controller's voltage compensation and rate control. Our training simulator couples an identified load-transient battery model to rotor dynamics and firmware saturation. The feedforward policy receives filtered voltage during both training and deployment. Controlled ablations distinguish the benefit of a larger thrust-command range from that of voltage information. On a 38 g Crazyflie Brushless, the resulting policy reduces circle tracking error by 49% relative to stock-authority RL at 3.84 m/s, while preserving easy-task precision. Mean 20-lap race time decreases from 106.22 s to 95.24 s. Compared with a voltage-blind policy with the same increased authority, hardware error and race time are lower by 15.3% and 4.5%, respectively. In simulation, replacing the policy's voltage input with a recording from a different battery condition worsens hard-circle tracking, with a smaller, voltage-dependent effect in racing. Together, these results show where a simple voltage input complements existing actuator compensation in aggressive learned flight.
Alejandro Sanchez Roncero, Olov Andersson, Petter Ogren
Department of Robotics, Perception and Learning, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
This paper demonstrates the effectiveness of machine learning-driven optimization for designing application-specific GaN tri-gate FinFETs in vertical power delivery systems. Conventional TCAD-based approaches are computationally intensive and insufficient for navigating the high-dimensional, nonlinear design space of advanced GaN devices. To address this, a physics-informed active learning framework is used to intelligently guide simulations, accelerating convergence while preserving accuracy. This ML-guided approach enables the discovery of optimal configurations by efficiently exploring key structural parameters -- most notably the GaN-to-AlGaN thickness ratio -- a long-standing focus of debate in device design. By systematically exploring key structural parameters, two optimized devices with aggressively scaled gate-to-drain lengths are identified. Single-fin, multi-channel simulations show that deviceD2, with a thinner GaN channel relative to the AlGaN barrier, achieves higher drive current. However, in a 300-fin configuration, deviceD1 outperforms deviceD2 by delivering 3.3,A at 0.49ohm on-resistance -- approximately 2× better -- despite slightly higher parasitics. Both devices operate in a normally-off mode. Based on an application-specific figure of merit, deviceD1 achieves 5,pC⋅ohm, demonstrating 2× greater switching efficiency than deviceD2, while both designs outperform industrial benchmarks from different performance standpoints.
Ayoub Sadeghi, Leonid Popryho, Inna Partin-Vaisband