User-Level Handover Decision Making Based on Machine Learning Approaches

We propose a machine learning (ML)-based framework for downlink performance prediction in 5G networks using real-time measurements from commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) user equipment (UE). Our experimental platform integrates the srsRAN 5G New Radio (NR) stack deployed on a Dell desktop serving as the 5G next generation nodeB (gNB), operating at 3.4 GHz. Two Google Pixel 7a smartphones are used to collect physical layer characteristics such as channel quality indicator (CQI), modulation and coding scheme (MCS), bit rate, transmission time interval (TTI), and block error rate (BLER), which are leveraged as predictors in model training. We use commercial-grade traffic generation tools, including Ookla, for stationary and mobility measurements under line-of-sight (LOS) and non-line-of-sight (nLOS) conditions. Test data includes global Ookla servers (e.g., USA, Portugal, Ghana, Egypt, Japan), iperf TCP/UDP data, and video streaming sessions from YouTube. To analyze inter-user interference, we also include scenarios with multiple UEs at the same location. We evaluate the predictive performance of five supervised regression models - linear regression, decision tree regression, random forest regression, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM). Our results demonstrate that throughput and BLER can be accurately predicted using COTS hardware and standard ML techniques in diverse real-world 5G scenarios.

In this paper, we propose a dueling double deep Q-network (DDQN)-based adaptive multi-objective handover framework for low Earth orbit (LEO) satellite networks. The proposed method enables dynamic trade-off learning among throughput, blocking probability, and switching cost under time-varying network conditions. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach consistently outperforms conventional baselines, achieving up to 10.3% throughput improvement and near-zero blocking under typical operating conditions.

AI models, and time-series models in particular are typically ranked by accuracy and deployed under constraints absent from that ranking. In this paper, we study a real setting where these constraints are explicit and measurable: handover pre- diction in cellular networks, where inference runs on the User Equipment once per 40 ms measurement period and must complete before the network acts. The timing bound is hard: a late prediction is superseded by the measurement it was predicting, while energy is a cumulative budget spent for the life of the device. Neither appears in the objective these models are selected on. We evaluate eight architectures under a protocol that screens for deadline feasibility at the tail rather than the mean, then ranks the feasible models on measured inference energy, count- ing the feature computation that precedes the forward pass and is usually omitted. Gradient-boosted trees on handcrafted temporal features are the most accurate model (F1=0.974) and among the cheapest to run, while the neural architecture an accuracy-only benchmark would rank first (CNN-1D, F1=0.914) costs over 3 times more energy per inference under a realistic duty-cycled deployment pattern. We give three conditions under which this outcome should be expected, so the finding applies beyond telecommunications. Accuracy-only benchmarking does not merely under-report deployment cost. It can rank first a model that cannot be deployed.