cs.LGSep 24, 2026

FB-GDM: Fully-Bayesian Guided Diffusion Models for High-Dimensional Linear Inverse Problems via Unsupervised Variational Inference

Authors: Gatien Séguy, Thomas Rodet

Organizations: SATIE · SATIE Laboratory, ENS Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Universit´e Paris-Saclay, 91190 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

Abstract

Diffusion models are powerful priors for linear inverse problems, but the reference guidance methods, Diffusion Posterior Sampling (DPS) and Pseudoinverse-Guided Diffusion Models (ΠΠGDM), rely on scalar hyperparameters tuned per task, usually against the ground truth. We introduce FB-GDM, a fully-Bayesian guided diffusion method that removes this calibration step. Starting from the Gaussian approximation of ΠΠGDM, we derive a closed-form conditional score that depends on two precision parameters (inverse variances), one associated with the denoising approximation and one with the observation likelihood, and treat them as latent variables inferred by variational inference at each reverse step. A separable factorization makes each update scale linearly with the number of pixels, so the inference stays tractable at full image resolution, at a cost comparable to one ΠΠGDM run. FB-GDM requires neither the noise level nor the ground truth: its only inputs are the observation and the forward operator. Experiments on CelebA-HQ inverse problems establish two results. (i) The precision parameters, inferred from the observation alone, allow FB-GDM to outperform ΠΠGDM at its nominal setting, even when the latter is given the true noise level, by up to 14 dB depending on the operator, and to match the ground-truth-calibrated ΠΠGDM oracle within 0.1 dB. (ii) FB-GDM is robust when the forward operator, the noise level, or the image distribution changes: it stays close to a per-problem ΠΠGDM oracle throughout and does not exhibit the hallucinations observed with DPS, whereas DPS substantially degrades at a fixed scale and ΠΠGDM stays competitive only if it is re-tuned against the ground truth for each new problem. When the prior is applied to images outside its training set, this re-balancing between data and prior keeps FB-GDM faithful where a fixed face-prior guidance can otherwise hallucinate.

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Learning Normalized Energy Models for Linear Inverse Problems

    May 15, 2026Nicolas Zilberstein, Santiago Segarra, Eero Simoncelli +1Bayesian Inverse ProblemsDenoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model

  2. Provable diffusion-based posterior sampling for linear inverse problems via DDIM

    Jul 21, 2026Yuchen Jiao, Na Li, Changxiao Cai +2Bayesian Inverse ProblemsPosterior Sampling

  3. A Posterior-Dynamics Framework for Imaging Inverse Problems with Pretrained Diffusion Priors

    Aug 15, 2026Zhaoqiang Liu, Tongyao Pang, Ruibing Wang +1Diffusion PriorsBayesian Inverse Problems