Multi-Objective Human-in-the-Loop Bayesian Optimization of a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton
Organizations: Georgia Institute of Technology
Abstract
Human-in-the-loop optimization (HILO) is a common approach for optimizing the control of assistive devices to account for the wearer's unique biomechanics and subjective preferences. However, despite research suggesting that a person may have a different prioritization of objectives depending on time-varying factors such as the environment, their mood, or energy levels, existing HILO approaches only consider a single objective or enforce a fixed weighting on a set of objectives. Neither approach is capable of representing an individual's preferences over objectives. In this work, we propose Multi-Objective Human-in-the-loop Bayesian Optimization (MO-HILBO), which builds on explicit multi-objective Bayesian optimization to efficiently infer a personalized set of Pareto-optimal controllers. We compare our approach with an existing multi-objective HILO method and experimentally demonstrate MO-HILBO on a lower-limb exoskeleton across two objectives: metabolic cost (efficiency) and ordinal human feedback (comfort). We find that MO-HILBO (1) discovers Pareto-optimal controllers, and (2) that the pairwise ordering of points on the Pareto front itself is consistent with validation trials. Lastly, we open-source mohilo, a Python package for running both HILO and MO-HILBO on wearable devices: https://dynamicmobility.github.io/mohilo/.
Figures & tables
| Hypervolume | Pairwise Ordering | |||
| Subject | Pareto | Anti-Pareto | Metabolic Cost | Comfort |
| MB01 | 4.02 | 1.300 | 100% (3/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| MB02 | 1.55 | 0.366 | 100% (3/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| MB03 | 1.02 | 0.128 | 67% (2/3) | 100% (3/3) |
Human-in-the-Loop AI
Human-in-the-loop AI combines human feedback, oversight, and decision-making with machine learning and autonomous systems.
See all 288 papers