From Visual Search to Movement Control: A Priority Field for Artificial Agents

When humans view scenes without a specific task (free-viewing), they initially direct their eye movements toward the scene center and then fixate on people, text, objects being gazed at or grasped, and semantically meaningful regions. What these signature fixation patterns reflect and whether they optimize an underlying perceptual task remain unknown. We show that a computational agent with simulated foveation, trained to optimize scene comprehension, exhibits emergent human fixation signature patterns. In contrast, versions of the agent trained to search or classify scenes, or equipped with peripheral vision that was better or worse than human vision, predicted human fixation patterns less accurately. Thus, human free-viewing fixation patterns may emerge as a functional byproduct of optimizing scene comprehension under the biological constraints of foveated vision.

Goal-conditioned systems assume goals are provided externally. We ask whether attentional priorities can emerge endogenously from an agent's internal cognitive state. We propose a priority function that generates observation targets from three epistemic gaps: ignorance (posterior variance), surprise (prediction error), and staleness (temporal decay of confidence in unobserved variables). We validate this in two systems: a minimal attention-allocation environment (2,000 runs) and a modular, partially observable world (500 runs). Ablation shows each component is necessary. A key finding is metric-dependent reversal: under global prediction error, coverage-based rotation wins; under change detection latency, priority-guided allocation wins, with advantage growing monotonically with dimensionality (d = -0.95 at N=48, p < 10^-6). Detection latency follows a power law in attention budget, with a steeper exponent for priority-guided allocation (0.55 vs. 0.40). When the decay rate is made learnable per variable, the system spontaneously recovers environmental volatility structure without supervision (t = 22.5, p < 10^-6). We demonstrate that epistemic gaps alone, without external reward, suffice to generate adaptive priorities that outperform fixed strategies and recover latent environmental structure.

Human observers prioritize visual information according to task goals. Most computational models of naturalistic viewing are gaze-trained for free viewing, leaving open whether goal-directed attention can emerge in systems without gaze supervision. We tested two off-the-shelf vision-language models (VLMs), Qwen3-VL-32B-Thinking and Gemma-4-26B-A4B-it, on 4,887 naturalistic scenes under visual-search and free-viewing instructions. Model predictions were compared with human fixations on the same images under corresponding tasks. Both models aligned more closely with human fixations under matching goals than under mismatched goals. This crossover persisted in target-absent scenes, where alignment could not be explained by simple visual grounding, and appeared in decoder-layer readouts. Furthermore, model-thinking traces were grounded in target semantics during search and in visual prominence during free viewing. These findings show that general-purpose VLMs can generate human-aligned, goal-directed spatial priorities without gaze-specific training, informing theories of goal-directed attention and offering scalable tools for predicting where people look across tasks.