SciHorizon-eLab: An Agentic Protocol-to-Task Compiler for Scalable Benchmarking of Scientific Embodied Agents

Agentic systems offer a promising way to automate embodied benchmark construction, but existing approaches typically cover isolated stages or remain specialized to predefined environments and task families. More importantly, multi-step construction produces dependent intermediate artifacts that are often passed downstream without artifact-specific verification, allowing local defects to propagate into the final benchmark. We present Embodied-BenchForge, an agentic framework that transforms user-specified evaluation intents into complete embodied benchmark artifacts. It formulates construction as Closed-Loop Benchmark Synthesis, integrating forward artifact synthesis with backward verification and repair. Skill-Orchestrated Artifact Synthesis composes typed and reusable skills into executable workflows, while an artifact dependency graph records intermediate outputs and their dependencies. Requirement-Guided Verification and Repair applies artifact-specific contracts throughout construction and uses provenance to trigger local re-execution or upstream rollback when verification fails. Embodied-BenchForge constructs six benchmarks covering diverse embodied scenarios in the Offline EQA Track, together with one interactive benchmark containing 220 executable tasks in the Interactive Embodied Track. Evaluations of representative MLLMs and embodied agents show that the benchmarks distinguish model capabilities in both observation-based understanding and closed-loop execution. Quality assessment and ablations validate benchmark quality and the effectiveness of verification and repair, while repair and skill-reuse analyses demonstrate efficient localized recovery and cross-benchmark reusability.

Wet-lab experimentation serves as the gold standard for hypothesis verification in scientific discovery; yet it is inherently labor-intensive, costly, and safety-critical. Embodied agents hold the promise of automating these tedious workflows, but their development is hindered by the scarcity of real-world training data. While simulation offers a scalable alternative for producing demonstrations, current methods primarily target relatively short-horizon tasks with loosely structured interactions, failing to meet the strict procedural constraints and fine-grained manipulation demands of chemical experiments. To bridge this gap, we introduce RoboChemGym, a framework that autonomously generates high-fidelity manipulation demonstrations aligned with real-world experiment protocols, featuring a self-improving task synthesis mechanism to iteratively refine task execution and scene configurations, enabling the reliable generation of expert trajectories for complex, multi-object protocols exceeding 10 interaction steps. Furthermore, we introduce a hierarchical benchmark that systematically assesses performance across varying granularities, spanning from atomic operations to full-cycle experimental workflows. RoboChemGym sets a scalable paradigm for the automated data synthesis and capability evaluation of embodied agents in intricate chemical tasks, serving as a critical stepping stone toward fully intelligent laboratories.

As agents rapidly evolve, existing benchmarks can become saturated, limiting their ability to distinguish capabilities and reveal remaining failure modes. Particularly in scientific domains, constructing and updating benchmarks requires substantial time, labor, and domain expertise, making it difficult to keep evaluation aligned with advances in agent capabilities. We address this challenge by investigating whether scientific-agent benchmarks can be automatically generated and iteratively adapted as agent capabilities evolve. We introduce AutoSciBench, a framework that represents each task as a high-level concept specifying the scientific domain, data modality, and required reasoning approach, together with a low-level recipe specifying how the question, environment, and ground-truth answer are constructed and verified. Agents attempt to solve each task, producing solver trajectories and corresponding judge feedback which AutoSciBench uses to revise the recipe or concept, closing observed shortcuts and shifting tasks toward raw-data re-examination, interpretation of intermediate results, and evidence integration. Experience distilled from completed refinement trajectories further guides new concept generation, allowing lessons from earlier task refinement to inform subsequent benchmark construction. Starting from existing benchmarks, we evaluate AutoSciBench across computational biology, materials science, and clinical imaging. Generated benchmarks reduce average solver accuracy by 22.4 and 25.5 percentage points relative to the human-curated benchmarks in computational biology and materials science, respectively, while generated tasks receive higher average quality ratings across all three domains, suggesting that scientific-agent evaluation can adapt as agent capabilities advance.