Geometry-Aware Operator Families for Structured Representation Learning
Organizations: The George Washington University
Abstract
The geometry of latent representations governs which components should interact and how information should propagate, making geometry-aware operator design a fundamental ingredient of structured deep representation learning. However, existing neural architectures typically rely on generic operator templates or geometry-specific constructions, creating a need for a unified framework that can derive admissible operators directly from fixed structural information while remaining adaptive to changing contexts. We introduce Geometry-Induced Operator Families (GIOF), a general framework that converts fixed geometry into a structured family of propagation operators and dynamically selects an appropriate member of this family according to the current context. GIOF first transforms geometry-derived interaction channels into reusable generator bases, then combines them through a context-dependent selector and adaptive propagation scale, and finally realizes the selected operator through stable continuous-time propagation and a bottleneck residual layer. We establish theoretical guarantees covering parameter compression, identifiability, stability, locality, compositional structure, and oversmoothing behavior, while controlled experiments validate these mechanisms and experiments on PEMS-BAY and METR-LA achieve the lowest mean MAE across all reported regional-outage settings, improving over the strongest retained baseline by 2.4%--8.8% at 30% missing sensors.
Figures & tables
| PEMS-BAY MAE | METR-LA MAE | Cost on PEMS-BAY | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | 20% | 100% | 20% | 100% | Params (K) | Train (min) | GPU (MiB) | Infer (ms) |
| GCN | 18.98 | 1.04 | 29.95 | 1.02 | ||||
| GATv2 | 19.52 | 1.54 | 51.99 | 1.86 | ||||
| APPNP | 18.43 | 1.56 | 47.58 | 2.20 | ||||
| MoNet | 23.42 | 3.46 | 107.63 | 5.37 | ||||
| ECC | 36.64 | 1.42 | 49.28 | 1.96 | ||||
Appendix figures & tables10 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Isotropic rank | Singular rank | Isotropic error | Singular error | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | 72–72 | 40–40 | ||
| 4 | 72–72 | 40–40 | ||
| 8 | 72–72 | 40–40 | ||
| 16 | 72–72 | 40–40 | ||
| 32 | 72–72 | 40–40 | ||
| 64 | 72–72 | 40–40 |
| Check | Maximum residual | Tolerance | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean-exit normalization | Pass | ||
| Pathwise Poisson bound | Pass | ||
| Disconnected leakage | Pass | ||
| Composition: directed invariants | Pass | ||
| Composition: symmetric invariants | Pass | ||
| Projection identity | Pass |
| Variant | Reg. MAE | Ind. MAE | Point MAE | Reg. RMSE | Params (K) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No-spatial | 16.38 | ||||
| Static | 18.44 | ||||
| Shuffled | 23.14 | ||||
| One-step | 23.14 | ||||
| GeoMLP | 23.27 | ||||
| FreeEdge | 61.24 |
Representation Learning
Representation learning develops data transformations that expose useful structure for prediction, transfer, generation, and control.
See all 813 papers