Eyes on the Road: A Naturalistic Comparison of MTW Rider Gaze in Urban Indian Traffic

Two-wheelers account for a disproportionately high share of road fatalities in the Global South. Research on two-wheeler rider behavior, however, lags far behind four-wheelers, where multimodal datasets have driven major advances in Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS). To address this gap, we present the MOtorized TwO-wheeler Rider (MOTOR) dataset, the first large-scale, multi-view, multimodal resource dedicated to two-wheelers in dense, unstructured traffic. MOTOR comprises 1,629 sequences (25+ hours of video data) collected from 16 riders and integrates synchronized front, rear, and helmet videos, rider eye-gaze from wearable trackers, on-road audio, and telemetry (GPS, accelerometer, gyroscope). Rich annotations capture traffic context, rider state, 12 riding maneuvers spanning conventional and unconventional behaviors, and legality labels (Legal, Illegal, Unspecified). We benchmark rider behavior recognition and maneuver legality classification using state-of-the-art video action recognition backbones (CNN and Transformer-based), extended with multimodal fusion, and find that combining RGB, gaze, and telemetry consistently yields the best performance. MOTOR thus provides a unique foundation for advancing safety-critical understanding of two-wheeler riding. It offers the research community a benchmark to develop and evaluate models for behavior analysis, legality-aware prediction, and intelligent transportation systems. Dataset and code is available at https: //varuniiith.github.io/MOTOR-Dataset/

Current hazard detection systems in autonomous driving may develop mesa objectives, learned internal goals that achieve high training performance through spurious correlations rather than genuine hazard recognition. We investigate whether human gaze patterns, captured via webcam-based eye tracking (WebGazer.js), can serve as privileged information to constrain mesa-objective formation. We collected 137,663 frame-level gaze samples synchronized with hazard annotations across 388 real dashcam clips, then test this hypothesis across two calibration protocols (9-point/45-click and 11-point/440-click), two model architectures (Random Forest and causal Transformer), and five random seeds per experiment with paired t-tests. No experiment yields a statistically significant improvement from gaze (p = 0.919, 0.578, and 0.667 respectively). A geometric analysis reveals the root cause: WebGazer's reported error (~130-257 px depending on configuration) exceeds 93% of detected hazard object sizes (median 36 px), rendering object-level gaze attribution physically impossible at this instrument precision.

Bird's-eye-view (BEV) representations have become a widely used interface between perception and planning in autonomous driving, but they encode what is in a scene, not what is behaviorally relevant to a human driver. Gaze offers a compelling behavioral signal for this gap, yet wearable eye trackers are routinely deployed as if their spatial output were ground truth, despite known sensitivity to head motion, illumination, and calibration drift. We present, to our knowledge, the first unified framework for quantifying wearable gaze accuracy under real driving conditions. Our on-road study contains 41 validated scenes in which one driver fixated a vehicle's license plate. Gaze error is measured as the angular difference between the plate center and the gaze direction estimated by the glasses. Separate indoor studies with the same driver and device systematically analyze how distance, illumination, head motion, target motion, and gaze eccentricity affect both systematic bias and gaze precision. The mean on-road error was 4.58 degrees. Applying an offset estimated from the indoor recordings reduced it to 1.10 degrees and improved all 41 scenes. Because this offset varied between sessions, reliable BEV supervision may require online recalibration and condition-dependent estimates of gaze uncertainty.