cs.LGSep 28, 2026

Minimax Last-Iterate Convergence in Matrix Games with Observed Actions

Authors: Yuheng Zhang

Organizations: University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Abstract

We study last-iterate convergence in unknown two-player zero-sum matrix games with bandit payoff feedback and observed opponent actions. For games with dd actions per player, we develop an algorithm achieving a duality gap of O~(d/t)\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(\sqrt{d/t}) with high probability, simultaneously at every round tt. This improves the dimension dependence of the best previously known guarantee by a factor of d3/2d^{3/2}. The rate matches a standard bandit lower bound, establishing minimax optimality in both the number of actions and the number of rounds, up to logarithmic factors. The algorithm is computationally efficient, requiring only O(d)\mathcal{O}(d) time and memory per round. Our technical contribution is a joint design of adaptive averaging and corrected exponential weights that absorbs estimation variance, together with a potential argument that bounds phase durations.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

May 10, 2026cs.LG

Near-Optimal Last-Iterate Convergence for Zero-Sum Games with Bandit Feedback and Opponent Actions

Last-iterate convergence of learning dynamics in games has attracted significant recent attention. In two-player zero-sum games with bandit feedback, where only the loss of the selected action pair is observed, Fiegel et al. (2025) show a separation between average-iterate and last-iterate convergence in duality gap: while the optimal t^(-1/2) rate after t rounds is achievable for the former via standard no-regret algorithms, the latter cannot converge faster than t^(-1/3) in expectation or t^(-1/4) with high probability. However, in many practical settings, such as preference learning, the players observe not only their loss but also the opponent's action. This raises a natural question: can such additional information enable faster last-iterate convergence? We answer this question affirmatively, showing that t^(-1/2) last-iterate convergence is achievable with high probability in this setting, via an efficient algorithm that updates its strategy infrequently by solving an estimated log-barrier-regularized game. We identify fundamental obstacles preventing standard analysis for multi-armed bandits, the single-player case, from generalizing to games, and develop a novel analysis to overcome them. Experiments confirm that our algorithm indeed converges faster than naive baselines and prior methods that do not exploit opponent-action feedback. Finally, we note that our results also improve those for dueling bandits, a special case with skew-symmetric game matrices.
Apr 16, 2026cs.LG

Optimal last-iterate convergence in matrix games with bandit feedback using the log-barrier

We study the problem of learning minimax policies in zero-sum matrix games. Fiegel et al. (2025) recently showed that achieving last-iterate convergence in this setting is harder when the players are uncoupled, by proving a lower bound on the exploitability gap of Omega(t^{-1/4}). Some online mirror descent algorithms were proposed in the literature for this problem, but none have truly attained this rate yet. We show that the use of a log-barrier regularization, along with a dual-focused analysis, allows this O-tilde(t^{-1/4}) convergence with high-probability. We additionally extend our idea to the setting of extensive-form games, proving a bound with the same rate.
Apr 17, 2026cs.LG

The Harder Path: Last Iterate Convergence for Uncoupled Learning in Zero-Sum Games with Bandit Feedback

We study the problem of learning in zero-sum matrix games with repeated play and bandit feedback. Specifically, we focus on developing uncoupled algorithms that guarantee, without communication between players, the convergence of the last-iterate to a Nash equilibrium. Although the non-bandit case has been studied extensively, this setting has only been explored recently, with a bound of O(T−1/8)\mathcal{O}(T^{-1/8}) on the exploitability gap. We show that, for uncoupled algorithms, guaranteeing convergence of the policy profiles to a Nash equilibrium is detrimental to the performance, with the best attainable rate being Ω(T−1/4)Ω(T^{-1/4}) in contrast to the usual Ω(T−1/2)Ω(T^{-1/2}) rate for convergence of the average iterates. We then propose two algorithms that achieve this optimal rate up to constant and logarithmic factors. The first algorithm leverages a straightforward trade-off between exploration and exploitation, while the second employs a regularization technique based on a two-step mirror descent approach.