The integration of artificial intelligence into computer-aided design frameworks has sparked a shift in the design of analog integrated circuits (ICs), transitioning the field from using manual and algorithmic-based solutions to adopting automated and intelligent paradigms. In this scenario, the GDSII file represents the industry-standard database containing the ultimate and most accurate source of information of the analog circuit, encapsulating the complex physical geometries and parasitic realities that define tape out performance. This paper proposes a novel framework that combines fine-tuned LLMs and CNNs to analyze GDSII files of analog circuits, enabling a conversational interface between the tool and the designers. Experimental results using thousands of analog designs across four realistic tasks demonstrate that the proposed solution outperforms state-of-the-art general-purpose massive VLMs by a significant margin (up to 81%), thus providing a lightweight solution to the problem of GDSII analysis.
Figures & tables
Category
Circuit Type
Variants
Avg. Devices
NMOS
PMOS
CAP
RES
Total Devices
Single Component
Capacitor
5000
1
–
–
1
–
5000
NMOS Transistor
5000
1
1
–
–
–
5000
PMOS Transistor
5000
1
–
1
–
–
5000
Resistor
5000
1
–
–
–
1
5000
Subtotal
20000
–
–
–
–
–
20000
Base Circuits
Ahuja OTA
995
15
10
4
1
–
14925
TABLE I : Dataset composition. For each category, the table reports the circuit types, the number of layout variants, the average number of devices per variant, and the average per-device-type counts (NMOS, PMOS, capacitors, and resistors).
Complexity
Task ID
Task Description
Easy
A
Identification of single component devices
(capacitors, resistors, NMOS, PMOS)
Medium
B
Identification of base circuit topologies
(OTAs, filters, regulators, gate drivers)
C
Component counting and enumeration
in base circuits
TABLE II : Task descriptions, organized by complexity (i) Easy, (ii) Medium, and (iii) Hard.
Task
Inspector
InternLM-4KHD [ 30 ]
GPT-5.2 [ 31 ]
parameters
tt+f
ti
accuracy
parameters
ti
accuracy
parameters
ti
accuracy
(# in billions)
(mm:ss)
(ss)
(%)
(# in billions)
(ss)
(%)
(# in billions)
(ss)
(%)
A
∼1
29 : 25
1.19
97
7
0.52
41
50000∗
2.3
100
B
∼1
28 : 48
0.24
91
7
0.54
16
50000∗
2.8
83
C
∼1
19 : 04
3.65
99
7
0.54
18
50000∗
4
20
D
∼1
15 : 37
2.62
92
7
0.52
24
50000∗
3.8
26
TABLE III: Comparison of Inspector with state-of-the-art VLMs in terms of parameters, runtime, and accuracy.
Fig. 3 : Layout of an HPF. The labels are generated to contain the whole bounding box of the device.
Task
mAP@0.5
mAP@0.5:0.95
Precision
Recall
(%)
(%)
(%)
(%)
A
99.4
99.48
99.91
100
B
99.3
99.34
98.43
98.12
C
99.5
98.66
99.99
99.99
D
99.4
93.13
99.55
99.40
TABLE IV : Inspector ’s CNN detection performance.
The integration of artificial intelligence into computer-aided design frameworks has sparked a shift in the design of analog integrated circuits (ICs), transitioning the field from using manual and algorithmic-based solutions to adopting automated and intelligent paradigms. In this scenario, the GDSII file represents the industry-standard database containing the ultimate and most accurate source of information of the analog circuit, encapsulating the complex physical geometries and parasitic realities that define tape out performance. This paper proposes THEIA, a novel dataset containing thousands of layout images paired with question-answer conversations, along with a benchmark that employs a fine-tuned vision-language model (VLM) to analyze GDSII files of analog circuits, enabling designers to interact with and query physical layouts as intuitive, meaningful entities. Experimental results using thousands of analog designs across five realistic tasks demonstrate that the proposed fine-tuned VLM outperforms state-of-the-art general-purpose VLMs by a significant margin (up to 73%), highlighting a fundamental gap between general-purpose multimodal reasoning and domain-specific layout understanding.
Giuseppe Chiari, Michele Piccoli, Federico Viola +1
Traditional design of analog circuits heavily relies on manual interventions across topology, sizing, and layout, with prior automation addressing stages in isolation. In this work, we propose PANDA, an LLM-enhanced framework that bridges high-level design intent to final layout by actively managing cross-stage dependencies through guided topology synthesis, substructure-aware sizing, and constraint-driven layout generation. This shifts automation from algorithm-centric execution to intent-centric co-design, reducing turnaround time from days or weeks to hours while improving design performance.
Haoyi Zhang, Weijian Fan, Xiaohan Gao +3
School of Integrated Circuits, Peking University, Beijing, China · Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing, China · Institute of Electronic Design Automation, Peking University, Wuxi, China
Analog circuit design is a time-consuming, iterative process in a nonlinear and high-dimensional design space that relies heavily on expert intuition. Among recent developments, LLMs have introduced a promising approach by bringing natural language reasoning to circuit design tasks. The majority of conventional LLM-based approaches provide fragmented solutions that focus either only on sizing or topology generation. These methods require adding specific technical knowledge manually, which is inefficient and prone to hallucinations during circuit sizing. Moreover, the inherent trade-off in meeting different specs makes current approaches iterative and tedious. Another shortcoming is the inability to create innovative topologies, which may lead to sub-optimal designs due to reliance on conventional topologies. In this paper, we present AaLLM, an open-source end-to-end multi-agent LLM workflow that takes user specs as input and outputs the appropriate netlist, encompassing both topology generation and circuit sizing. AaLLM automates the creation of a relevant knowledge base from research papers and textbooks to combat tedious manual data collection. A RAG model is implemented to emulate circuit design expertise using this knowledge base. Moreover, AaLLM uses a novel tri-agent feedback system comprising a Designer that determines circuit component values, a Critic that scrutinizes these values, and an Evaluator that minimizes circuit sizing iterations by arbitrating between the other two agents. AaLLM-generated novel topologies achieve a figure of merit (FoM) comparable to that of known topologies, and up to 3x higher for certain circuits. Testing on several circuit topologies, our results show a 3x - 4.5x decrease in the number of SPICE calls at inference when compared to SOTA multi-agent LLM pipelines. The results also show a 40x decrease in wall-clock time compared to existing approaches.