Revisiting Risky Tackle Detection with Vision Transformers

The wide adoption of Vision Transformers (ViTs) in safety-critical applications raises reliability concerns related to hardware faults. Algorithm-Based Fault Tolerance (ABFT) methods have emerged as lightweight and symmetric protection mechanisms for DNNs. However, they are particularly challenging for ViTs due to their significant computational requirements. This work comprehensively evaluates the reliability of ViTs, emphasizing the need for symmetric protection in their layers. Furthermore, we present CheckOne, a novel, cost-effective method for fault detection and mitigation in ViTs that significantly reduces the computational cost compared to conventional ABFT. Through extensive experiments with multiple ViTs, CheckOne mitigates critical faults by up to $26\times$ and achieves an average 3.8x higher performance than ABFT in ViTs.

Fine-grained visual perception enables vision-language models to distinguish subtle attributes and ground their answers in visual evidence. In high-resolution scenes, processing the whole image at greater resolution spends visual tokens on irrelevant content, while isolated crops can lose the context needed to interpret the selected evidence. We introduce EviViT, a lightweight attachment that learns where a pretrained vision transformer should acquire detail. Human visual-search traces supervise a question-conditioned evidence density, which guides regional re-reading from the original pixels and the allocation of visual tokens. A sparse, coordinate-aware bridge then connects the regional features to the global scene, allowing the host to interpret precise evidence in context. Learned with the host backbone frozen, the attachment serves both the base model and compatible post-trained descendants without refitting. Experiments across nine hosts show consistent gains in average fine-grained accuracy. Matched-budget comparisons further show that EviViT outperforms global-only processing at every tested token ceiling while using fewer visual tokens.

Vehicle body type is a significant determinant of cyclist injury severity in overtaking crashes, yet automated tools for classifying vehicles into injury-risk-relevant categories from naturalistic roadway video do not exist in the open literature. Standard object detection benchmarks provide only coarse vehicle labels (car, truck, bus, motorcycle), while existing fine-grained recognition systems are trained on controlled imagery and lack evaluation for deployment robustness across recording sites. This paper presents an open-source two-stage computer vision pipeline combining a pre-trained RT-DETR detector for coarse vehicle localization with a fine-tuned Vision Transformer (ViT-Base/16) for six-category body-type classification: passenger car, SUV, pickup truck, minivan, large van, and commercial truck. A confidence-based abstention mechanism withholds Stage 2 predictions when softmax output falls below 0.60, producing unknown labels rather than silent misclassifications. Evaluated on 3,805 annotated overtaking events from a bicycle-lane corridor in Ann Arbor, Michigan (in-distribution), the pipeline achieved 0.94 accuracy with per-class F1 scores from 0.91 (minivan) to 0.97 (SUV). On an independent out-of-distribution evaluation of 311 events from an open cycling dataset without retraining, accuracy was 0.89. Three of four well-represented categories maintained F1 at or above 0.90 under domain shift. The largest degradation was observed for minivan (F1 = 0.72), driven by abstention rate rising from 2.4% to 25.0% rather than active misclassification, consistent with the mechanism propagating genuine model uncertainty. The full pipeline, including inference scripts, training code, evaluation utilities, and model weights, is released as open-source software to support reproducibility and reuse across roadside video archives and cycling safety research.