Curating Synthetic Data for Task-Specific Visual Perception

The bottleneck in learning-based industrial defect detection is often limited not by model capacity, but by the scarcity of labeled defect data: defects are rare, annotations are expensive, and collecting balanced training sets is slow. We present an end-to-end pipeline for synthetic defect generation and annotation, combining Vision-Language-Model-based prompts, LoRA-adapted diffusion, mask-guided inpainting, and sample filtering with automatic label derivation, and demonstrates the potential of real data with realistic synthetic samples to overcome data scarcity. The evaluation is conducted on, a challenging dataset of pitting defects on ball screw drives, and then on a subset of the Mobile phone screen surface defect segmentation dataset (MSD) dataset to test cross-domain transfer. Beyond downstream detector performance, we analyze key stages of the pipeline, including prompt construction, LoRA selection, and sample filtering with DreamSim and CLIPScore, to understand which synthetic samples are both realistic and useful. Experiments with YOLOv26, YOLOX, and LW-DETR show that synthetic-only training does not replace real data. When combined with real data, synthetic defects can preserve performance and yield modest gains in selected BSData training regimes. The MSD transfer study shows that the overall pipeline structure carries over to a second industrial inspection domain, while also highlighting the importance of domain-specific adaptation and annotation-quality control. Overall, the paper provides an end-to-end assessment of diffusion-based industrial defect synthesis and shows that its strongest value lies in strengthening scarce real datasets rather than substituting for them.

Modern computer vision systems increasingly encounter performance limitations in data-scarce domains, where collecting large-scale, high-quality labeled data is costly or impractical. While controllable diffusion models enable scalable synthetic image generation, directly applying synthetic augmentation often leads to unstable performance gains due to dataset-level quality issues and insufficient feedback mechanisms. In this work, we present a Real-Calibrated Synthetic-First Data Engine, a modular data engineering framework that combines controllable diffusion generation and multi-stage curation/filtering within a unified pipeline, with optional support for uncertainty-driven selection and human verification. Instead of introducing new generative algorithms, our approach focuses on systematic dataset construction for improving the practical reliability of synthetic augmentation in low-data regimes. The framework is implemented as a modular CLI-based pipeline, where generation, filtering, selection, and validation components can be independently configured and replaced. This design emphasizes reproducibility, flexibility, and practical deployment in real-world data workflows. Through empirical evaluation centered on human pose estimation, we show that synthetic data improves a real-data baseline when used as near-zero-human-annotation-cost augmentation alongside real anchors, while synthetic-only training remains substantially below real-only performance. Supplementary segmentation diagnostics show the same domain-gap pattern. These results highlight the practical value of data-centric orchestration for low-data augmentation.

Modern computer vision models achieve high accuracy when trained on large-scale annotated datasets. In critical domains such as construction safety monitoring, data collection is costly, hazardous, and ethically constrained. This paper presents a systematic study comparing two complementary data generation paradigms, (1) Unity Simulation-based rendering and (2) Controllable Diffusion-based generation (CIA), for object detection under real data-scarce conditions. A unified experimental framework enables controlled dataset mixing across real, simulated, and generative sources, while maintaining identical model and training settings. Quantitative evaluation using Precision, Recall, mAP, and custom $Δ$-metrics, reveals that neither simulation nor generative augmentation alone achieves optimal transferability. Unity-only training yields an mAP@0.5 drop of $-50\%$ relative to real data, while CIA-only training shows a milder $-16.5\%$ degradation. Hybrid compositions significantly improve performance, with the 90% real + 10% Unity configuration achieving the best overall mAP@0.5 of $62.68\%$ ($+7.64\%$ over baseline), and the 90% real + 10% CIA configuration maximizing precision at $74.45\%$. Results demonstrate that limited synthetic inclusion enhances generalization, while excessive substitution induces domain drift.