Systematically Exploring the Capabilities of GPT-6 Astra as Embodied Policies

Embodied AI systems are often organized into System 1 and System 2. System 1 is typically a pretrained policy that generates actions at high frequency, whereas System 2 is often instantiated as a vision-enabled language model for high-level planning. We ask whether a large language model (LLM) can act as the policy for robot manipulation without task-specific finetuning. We call this setting LLM as policy. We evaluate three LLMs on all 42 RoboDojo tasks and compare their scores with 40 public policies. Astra and GPT-5.5 use the official 50-episode-per-task protocol; DeepSeek-Flash uses 10 episodes per task. GPT-6 Astra achieves 22.48% average success rate and 28.97 Score over 2,100 trials, ranking above every public entry. Yet GPT-5.5 and DeepSeek-Flash reach only 0.88% and 1.92% average success rate with the same post-processing. We find that Astra exhibits a sharply polarized capability profile. It generalizes well to tasks that require semantic understanding but not high-precision control. In contrast, it performs poorly on tasks that require precision, dynamic control, or complex bimanual coordination. In-context experiments show no aggregate benefit from one-shot demonstrations, while selected interaction traces show within-episode corrections under perturbations. Overall, the evaluated LLMs vary substantially in manipulation performance. Astra stands out and provides initial evidence for the potential of a general-purpose manipulation model, although reliable precision and dynamic control remain limitations in the evaluated setting.

We investigate whether GPT-6-Astra, a general-purpose foundation model, can navigate unfamiliar environments using its own perception, reasoning, and decision-making capabilities. Our evaluation focues on zero-shot vision-and-language navigation in continuous environments (VLN-CE) through a minimal interface in the Codex harness, aiming to unleash GPT-6-Astra's full potential for navigation. Using monocular RGB, GPT-6-Astra decides when to observe, how to move, and when to stop, without navigation-specific fine-tuning, a trained waypoint predictor, or a pre-built scene map. Our evaluation yields four main findings. First, \textbf{\textit{GPT-6-Astra achieves strong zero-shot navigation performance using only monocular RGB observations}}. On the common-adopted zero-shot R2R-CE benchmark, ultra reasoning achieves a success rate of \textbf{\textit{79.0%}}, exceeding the strongest reported zero-shot and supervised success rates by \textbf{\textit{13.0}} and \textbf{\textit{6.9}} percentage points, respectively. Second, \textbf{\textit{GPT-6-Astra advances multi-stage language instructions into coherent, adaptive navigation}} by grounding spatial relations, tracking task progress, and revising its actions. Third, \textbf{\textit{reliable route execution and goal verification remain challenging, even with ultra reasoning}}. Plausible local landmark matches do not consistently lead to correct task completion. Fourth, \textbf{\textit{these capabilities motivate rethinking the role of embodied learning}}. Future VLN research should build on foundation models to advance generalizable and reliable embodied intelligence.

General-purpose vision-language models offer a promising way to zero-shot robot control: \gptastra{} excels at open-ended and language- or image-conditioned manipulation but remains substantially weaker on high-precision and long-horizon tasks. We introduce \emph{RoboICL}, an in-context robot-control framework that narrows these gaps without robot-specific parameter updates or a learned VLA. RoboICL separates \emph{demonstration context}, which provides recorded examples when available, from \emph{interaction memory}, which accumulates the model's own actions and observed outcomes. Both use a shared observation--action--receipt--observation grammar. To preserve experience across task stages, RoboICL combines sampled demonstration blocks with bounded anchored memory. Fixed anchors keep earlier rollout interactions available for in-context learning, while the latest interaction supports immediate error correction. Across 30 RoboDojo tasks, using zero shot for Open and one demonstration elsewhere, RoboICL improves on official zero-shot \gptastra{} by 20--27 progress-score points in every category. It leads the leaderboard baselines on Memory and Open, achieves comparable performance to the strongest Precision baseline, and remains competitive on Long-Horizon. Its 30-task Overall score is 50.64, versus 33.68 for the strongest baseline. On a separate ten-task subset, RoboICL scores 60.60, within 2.00 points of the $π_{0.5}$ + \gptastra{} hybrid approach. On three real-robot tasks, mean progress rises from 14.45 at zero shot to 63.33 at one shot and 78.89 at three shots. On two development tasks, optional Jev-gated action reuse reduces \gptastra{} calls by 33--48%. Code is available at https://github.com/Mosi-AI/RoboICL.