GateSPINE: Gated Cross-View Fusion for Lumbar Spine MRI Report Generation

Spinal pathology is a leading cause of pain and disability worldwide. Spine MRI is central to clinical evaluation, yet its interpretation remains complex and time-consuming, requiring integration of information across multiple imaging sequences and anatomical regions. Despite recent advances in automated MRI analysis, effectively combining multi-sequence data while preserving sequence-specific diagnostic information remains an open challenge. Here we present SpineAgent, a multi-agent framework for spine MRI report generation built upon a multi-sequence foundation model trained on routine clinical data from 32,047 patients and 453,683 MRI series, comprising a total of 13,441,191 MRI slices. To accommodate diverse modalities of sequences, we first pre-train two DINOv3-based encoders separately on T1- and T2-weighted sequences. We then introduce a continual training strategy that learns a synthesizer to embed images of other sequences using the T1 and T2 encoders, producing patient-level embedding that integrates various signals across MRI sequences. Using these embeddings, SpineAgent achieves state-of-the-art performance, and demonstrates strong generalizability under cross-manufacturer and cross-cohort evaluation. Beyond classification, SpineAgent enables pathology localization by identifying findings-relevant slices and segmenting pathological regions. It also supports multimodal image-report retrieval, providing a solid foundation for scalable and explainable MRI report generation. We further integrate these validated capabilities of SpineAgent into 37 specialized agents. Finally, we incorporate their outputs as structured tokens within a Medical Report Agent trained end-to-end for report generation. Through both automated metrics and expert evaluation by five radiologists, SpineAgent achieves leading performance in spine MRI report generation.

Radiology reporting is time-consuming and subject to inter-rater variability, making automated report generation an attractive clinical application for Vision-Language Models (VLMs). We benchmark state-of-the-art VLMs on lumbar spine MRI with a focus on diagnostic accuracy and demonstrate that standard lexical and semantic metrics poorly reflect clinical correctness: fluent, well-structured reports can score highly while containing clinically meaningful diagnostic errors. To address this failure mode, we propose an architecture-agnostic framework that augments VLM inputs with spatially localized, disc-level anomaly heatmaps generated by a semi-supervised U-Net++ model. These heatmaps both improve anatomical sensitivity through explicit visual grounding and provide an independent interpretability output for clinical oversight, moving us closer to diagnostically reliable, visually grounded VLMs for lumbar spine MRI interpretation.

Lumbar spine conditions are a leading cause of disability worldwide, yet reliable quantification of degeneration from MRI remains challenging. In clinical practice, analysis is predominantly performed in two dimensions (2D), as manual three-dimensional (3D) assessment is time-consuming. However, 2D measurements suffer from limited reproducibility, particularly when anatomical structures are not aligned with the imaging plane. Existing automated approaches are often restricted to 2D, rely on discrete grading, or lack robustness and interpretability. We introduce SpineReport, an open-source, fully automated framework for comprehensive 3D morphometric analysis of lumbar spine MRI. Leveraging robust anatomical segmentations, the method extracts quantitative metrics from key structures, including the spinal canal, spinal cord, vertebrae, intervertebral discs, and foramina. These include both morphological and signal-based features, enabling cross-subject and longitudinal assessment. SpineReport further generates subject-specific reports that allow comparison with cohort distributions, improving interpretability and objective characterization of spinal morphology. Clinical relevance was evaluated against radiologist-reported severity grades for central canal, lateral recess, and foraminal stenosis. Metrics showed strong associations with central canal stenosis severity, with T2-weighted CSF signal providing the highest performance (AUC = 0.95). Canal AP diameter and area ratios also demonstrated strong correlations and high discriminative ability (AUC > 0.80). For lateral recess stenosis, associations were moderate, with lateral CSF signal being the most informative (AUC = 0.73). No significant associations were observed for foraminal stenosis despite robust region-of-interest extraction. SpineReport is released as an open-access tool: https://ivadomed.github.io/SpineReport/