Organizations: School of Artificial Intelligence, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, China · Lappeenranta-Lahti University of Technology, Lappeenranta, Finland
Reliable visual inspection is essential for quality assurance in aero-engine blade manufacturing, where defect appearance may vary across production lines, imaging conditions, blade poses, and surface backgrounds. Such domain shifts cause a mismatch between training and deployment data and degrade the reliability of deep defect detectors in online inspection. This problem is particularly challenging because aero-engine blade images usually contain sparse defects, making pseudolabel-based adaptation vulnerable to noisy or missing predictions. To address this issue, we propose Aero-engine Blade Defect Detector (ABDD), an online adaptive detection framework based on test-time adaptation. ABDD introduces a Dual-Alignment Strategy to jointly adapt global visual style and local defect morphology by combining feature-statistics alignment with pseudo-box alignment. To reduce error accumulation from unreliable pseudo labels, an Uncertainty-aware Box Filtering mechanism evaluates pseudo boxes using classification confidence, classification entropy, and localization entropy. In addition, a lightweight Sparse Dilated Mona module enables parameter-efficient delta tuning while limiting source-domain forgetting. ABDD is evaluated on CD-AeBD and HD-AeBD under multiple domain-shift scenarios, with TTA strategies compared under a unified RT-DETR + Swin-T architecture. Experiments show that ABDD consistently improves detection robustness under domain shifts, and its practicality is further validated on an industrial inspection platform.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Aero-engine blade defect detection under cross-domain shifts. Source and target images may differ in background, viewpoint, and illumination, resulting in feature-distribution discrepancies and detection performance degradation.
Figure 2: Overview of the proposed ABDD for aero-engine blade defect detection.
Setting
Images
Boxes
Def.
Domains
Source → Target
CD-AeBD I
1,639
2,371
4
Same, Back., View., Illum.
Same → Back./View./Illum.
CD-AeBD II
2,703
4,050
4
D1, D2, D3
D1 → D2/D3
HD-AeBD
1,857
2398
3
B1, B2, B3
B1 → B2/3
Table 1: Summary of the datasets and domain-shift settings. Def. denotes defect categories.
Method
Same
Back.
View.
Illum.
Ab
Br
Fr
Gr
Mean
F1
FPS
Yolov10 [ 25 ]
87.9
82.0 ↓5.9
77.4 ↓10.5
69.7 ↓18.2
67.7
86.5
83.3
80.8
79.3
70.7
42.5
Yolov13 [ 9 ]
86.8
80.8 ↓6.0
77.9 ↓8.9
67.4 ↓19.4
78.2
85.6
72.0
78.9
78.2
69.9
43.8
RT-DETR [ 38 ]
89.8
84.2 ↓5.6
79.7 ↓10.1
68.3 ↓21.5
68.8
87.2
83.1
82.0
80.5
71.4
22.9
MI-DETR [ 14 ]
89.8
85.5 ↓4.3
79.0 ↓10.8
75.5 ↓14.3
80.7
83.2
86.8
77.7
82.5
73.6
20.2
Dfine [ 16 ]
90.4
86.5 ↓3.9
80.9 ↓9.5
71.1 ↓19.3
73.6
87.8
84.0
83.2
82.2
72.3
36.0
MR-DETR [ 35 ]
92.1
87.0 ↓5.1
83.2 ↓8.9
76.6 ↓15.5
77.1
87.6
85.7
86.9
84.7
76.7
10.8
Table 2: Results ( mAP@50 ) of detectors and TTA methods across different domains in CD-AeBD I. Same , Back. , View. , and Illum. denote source, background-shift, viewpoint-shift, and illumination-shift domains, while Ab , Br , Fr , and Gr denote ablation, breakdown, fracture, and groove. The mean denotes the average score across four domains, representing overall performance. Best scores are highlighted in bold .
Method
CD-AeBD II ( mAP@50 )
HD-AeBD ( mAP@50 )
HD-AeBD ( mAP@50:95 )
D1
D2
D3
Mean
B1
B2
B3
Mean
B1
B2
B3
Mean
Yolov10 [ 25 ]
85.2
63.1 ↓22.1
65.4 ↓19.8
71.2
88.4
75.0 ↓13.4
78.8 ↓9.6
80.7
50.8
36.1 ↓14.7
35.6 ↓15.2
40.8
Yolov13 [ 9 ]
84.9
66.0 ↓18.9
68.7 ↓16.2
73.2
85.7
68.9 ↓16.8
71.2 ↓14.5
75.3
45.8
29.7 ↓16.1
26.8 ↓19.0
34.1
RT-DETR [ 38 ]
85.7
60.3 ↓25.4
59.3 ↓26.4
68.4
86.3
75.2 ↓11.1
77.3 ↓9.0
79.6
47.8
32.3 ↓15.5
33.9 ↓13.9
38.0
Dfine [ 16 ]
84.8
64.9 ↓19.9
66.0 ↓18.8
71.9
83.7
74.4 ↓9.3
69.9 ↓13.8
76.0
47.4
34.0 ↓13.4
31.4 ↓16.0
37.6
MR-DETR [ 35 ]
87.9
68.8 ↓19.1
70.8 ↓17.1
75.8
89.0
80.8 ↓8.2
79.2 ↓9.8
83.0
56.1
29.6 ↓26.5
30.8 ↓25.3
38.8
Table 3: Results of state-of-the-art detectors and TTA methods on CD-AeBD II and HD-AeBD. CD-AeBD II reports mAP@50 across D1–D3. HD-AeBD reports mAP@50 and mAP@50:95 across B1–B3. Subscripted downward arrows indicate performance drops from the source domain. The best scores in each column are highlighted in bold .
Figure 3: Visualizations of shallow/deep feature maps and detection results. Rows 1–3 are target domains in CD-AeBD-I, rows 4–5 are target domains in CD-AeBD-II, and rows 6–7 are target domains in HD-AeBD.
Comp.
Variant
CD-I
CD-II
HD
Aux.
DAS
w/o PB, FD
13.1
25.7
10.1
–
DAS
PB only
6.9
24.4
6.5
–
DAS
FD only
7.4
18.9
11.2
–
DAS
PB + FD
5.1
8.5
5.9
–
UBF
Conf.
10.9
38.3
12.5
35.4/18.8/33.9
UBF
PE + CE
6.2
17.6
8.8
60.2/39.7/41.2
Table 4: Ablation study of ABDD. CD-I, CD-II, and HD denote average performance drops, where lower is better. Aux. reports GT p for UBF and trainable parameters for tuning. Best results are in bold .
Fault detection identifies abnormal behavior in machines, sensors, infrastructure, software, and autonomous systems before it causes harm or disruption.
Wind turbine blade defect detection remains highly challenging in real-world inspection scenarios due to limited on-site data and the subtle visual characteristics of defects. In practice, blade defects are often small-scale, low-contrast, and difficult to distinguish from complex backgrounds, which significantly limits the robustness of existing detectors. To address these challenges, we propose BladeYOLO, a defect detection framework for wind turbine blades. Specifically, we integrate a Vision Transformer (ViT) backbone initialized with DINOv3 self-supervised pre-trained weights into YOLOv12-L, enabling the transfer of large-scale generic visual priors to blade defect detection and improving feature representation under limited training annotations. To enhance the perception of subtle defects, we further develop a Mamba-guided Weak-Defect Enhancement module, which consists of a Detail-Enhanced Multi-scale Branch for preserving high-frequency structural cues and a Cross-Mamba module for progressively propagating high-level semantic guidance to shallow features. In addition, we introduce a lightweight Style-Injector module that captures environment-related style information via Fourier decomposition and injects it into selected ViT self-attention layers, thereby improving robustness against environment-induced appearance variations. Extensive experiments demonstrate that BladeYOLO achieves superior performance on the WTBlade-Defect dataset, with additional annotation-budget experiments showing its favorable performance under reduced training annotations. Evaluation on the public Wind Surface Defect dataset further provides supportive evidence for the cross-dataset robustness of BladeYOLO. In particular, on this public dataset, BladeYOLO outperforms the best competing method by 3.5% in mAP50 and 2.5% in mAP50−95.
Yabin Xu, Fangtao Zhang, Fan Wang +5
School of Mechanical Engineering, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China · Department of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Zhejiang Energy Digital Technology Co., Ltd, Hangzhou 311100, China · School of Computer Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China +1
Recent advances in anomaly detection (AD) for industrial inspection have pushed performance on standard benchmarks toward saturation. However, strong benchmark performance does not necessarily translate to real-world deployment, as these benchmarks are primarily collected under controlled acquisition conditions. Changes in illumination, background, viewpoint, and other environmental factors can shift normal samples away from the learned normal distribution and cause false anomaly responses. We address AD under such distribution shifts by explicitly modeling nuisance variation from changing imaging conditions in feature space. Without anomaly labels or target-domain data, our Nuisance-Filtered Anomaly Detection (NFAD) framework estimates a nuisance subspace from matched feature displacements induced by content-preserving perturbations and suppresses its contribution to anomaly residuals at inference. The same subspace supports two complementary branches: full projection for image-level detection and selective suppression for pixel-level localization, preserving evidence of localized defects. On AeBAD-S, a benchmark specifically designed for AD under acquisition shifts, NFAD achieves 91.0% image-level AUROC, establishing a new state of the art. Notably, this robustness does not come at the expense of conventional AD performance: NFAD remains competitive on standard benchmarks that do not explicitly evaluate distribution shift, including VisA, Real-IAD, and MVTec AD. These results show that explicitly suppressing such nuisance variation improves AD under distribution shift while preserving strong performance in standard settings.
Dat Cao, Son Nghiem, Phan Nguyen +2
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), South Korea · Sony Computer Science Laboratories (Sony CSL), Japan · The University of Tokyo, Japan +1
Object detection models for autonomous driving commonly experience substantial performance drops when deployed under adverse weather due to the domain shift between training data and real-world operating conditions. This degradation is especially evident when models trained on clear-weather images encounter foggy environments with reduced visibility and contrast. To address this challenge, we introduce FogTTA, an online test-time adaptation framework designed to improve the robustness of Transformer-based object detectors in fog. Using RF-DETR as the underlying object detector, FogTTA enables real-time adaptation to the streaming target domain without requiring source data or retraining. The framework follows a teacher-student design, where the deployed model serves as the teacher and generates pseudo labels from weakly augmented target inputs. These predictions are subsequently refined through non-maximum suppression and confidence filtering. The student model then learns from strongly augmented target sample using the Varifocal loss to mitigate pseudo-label noise. The teacher is updated via exponential moving averaging to ensure stable and continuous adaptation. Experiments show that FogTTA outperforms prior baselines, delivering improved detection accuracy and stability while maintaining real-time performance.
Ali Abedi, Q. M. Jonathan Wu, Ning Zhang +1
University of Windsor · University of Toronto Mississauga