Visuomotor policies trained via imitation learning often inherit the unnecessarily slow timing of teleoperated demonstrations. Yet uniform speedup is unreliable because different phases of a manipulation task tolerate acceleration differently. In this work, we introduce AdaTempo, a self-supervised method that accelerates visuomotor policies by exploiting shared relative-tempo structure in demonstrations. AdaTempo establishes phase correspondence, aggregates the aligned relative tempo into a consensus, and maps it to a continuous speedup profile used to resample demonstrations into accelerated training trajectories. Training standard policies such as ACT or Diffusion Policy on these resampled trajectories directly embeds the desired tempo in the learned behavior, without runtime tempo selection or online retiming. Extensive evaluations show that AdaTempo achieves up to a 3.57× speedup and yields a stronger success--speed trade-off than the original policies and representative acceleration baselines.
Figures & tables
Fig. 2: Pipeline. Demonstrations with different durations are aligned to a canonical phase. Their relative-tempo consensus and agreement determine a continuous speedup profile, which resamples the demonstrations for standard visuomotor policy training.
Fig. 3: Simulation tasks. We evaluate five tasks from ALOHA and Robomimic. Transfer Cube and Insertion emphasize coordinated bimanual manipulation, while Can, Lift, and Square cover single-arm grasping and precise object manipulation.
Fig. 4: Real-world evaluation tasks. We consider six tasks covering complementary manipulation challenges. Among them, Sorting and Folding emphasize long-horizon, multi-stage manipulation; Pouring and Stacking Cups require precise coordination and spatial alignment; and Conveyor Fast stresses time-critical manipulation, requiring the robot to keep pace with fast-moving objects.
Task
cmin
cmax
Transfer Cube
1.85
3.80
Insertion
1.90
4.00
Lift
3.40
6.50
Can
3.40
6.50
Square
1.60
2.40
Picking Cube
1.90
3.80
TABLE I: Task-specific acceleration bounds.
Transfer Cube
Insertion
Lift
Can
Square
Method
success rate ( ↑ )
SOD ( ↑ )
success rate ( ↑ )
SOD ( ↑ )
Method
success rate ( ↑ )
SOD ( ↑ )
success rate ( ↑ )
SOD ( ↑ )
success rate ( ↑ )
SOD ( ↑ )
ACT
45.33%
1.36
23.33%
1.37
DP
100.00%
1.45
95.33%
1.46
82.00%
1.42
ACT-2x
53.00%
2.28
12.00%
2.21
DP-Fast
95.00%
1.59
87.00%
2.48
55.00%
2.20
ACT+DemoSpeedup
69.00%
2.59
18.00%
3.01
DP+DemoSpeedup
100.00%
2.67
80.00%
3.10
73.67%
2.94
SAIL (ACT)
63.33%
2.53
15.33%
2.23
SAIL (DP)
100.00%
3.98
92.00%
3.20
86.00%
1.18
ACT+AdaTempo
83.67%
2.77
25.00%
2.65
DP+AdaTempo
100.00%
3.28
82.67%
3.57
86.33 %
1.90
TABLE II: Simulation results on five manipulation tasks from the ALOHA MuJoCo [ 1 ] and robomimic [ 37 ] benchmarks.
Picking Cube
Sorting
Pouring
Folding
Stacking Cups
Conveyor Fast
Method
success ( ↑ )
time (s) ( ↓ )
success ( ↑ )
time (s) ( ↓ )
success ( ↑ )
time (s) ( ↓ )
success ( ↑ )
time (s) ( ↓ )
success ( ↑ )
time (s) ( ↓ )
success ( ↑ )
time (s) ( ↓ )
ACT
22/30
11.2
15/30
35.6
26/30
32.2
18/30
30.3
22/30
17.9
2/30
6.9
ACT+DemoSpeedup
24/30
5.9
18/30
19.4
23/30
17.8
8/30
15.4
17/30
8.1
12/30
3.5
ACT+AdaTempo
28/30
6.1
14/30
18.2
26/30
18.3
23/30
14.2
20/30
7.8
29/30
3.2
TABLE III: Real-world evaluation on six manipulation tasks.
Fig. 5: Relative-tempo consistency. (a) Demonstrator-wise consensus profiles on Conveyor Fast from three demonstrators, together with the pooled consensus. (b) Median and interquartile range of leave-one-out Spearman correlations across demonstrations on all 11 tasks.
Transfer Cube
Insertion
Variant
success rate ( ↑ )
SOD ( ↑ )
success rate ( ↑ )
SOD ( ↑ )
Full AdaTempo
83.67%
2.77
25.00%
2.65
Single-demo relative tempo
82.00%
2.57
20.33%
2.64
w/o confidence weighting
77.00%
2.79
22.00%
2.99
w/o temporal regularization
72.33%
2.56
23.67%
2.96
RBD-style augmentation
83.33%
2.74
19.00%
2.57
TABLE IV: Ablation results on the ALOHA simulation tasks.
College of Intelligent Robotics and Advanced Manufacturing, Fudan University, Shanghai, China · School of Computing, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China