cs.ROOct 4, 2026

TacGELLO: Tactile Contact Feedback for a 3D-Printed Teleoperation Leader

Authors: Younsoo Kim, Sangmin Song, Sarath Kodagoda, Marc Carmichael, Karthick Thiyagarajan

Organizations: University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia · Western Sydney University, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Passive leader arms transmit an operator's motion without returning remote contact or load cues. TacGELLO uses the existing servos of a 3D-printed leader for tactile contact feedback at the gripper trigger and current-based load cues at the arm joints. AnySkin contact detection activates a trigger position hold, while changes in follower joint current adjust leader-servo output limits to command resistance during lifting. Across six UR3 sessions with one operator, sent-command tracking error was 0.15--0.36∘^\circ RMSE, with estimated trajectory lag of 82--98,ms. Tactile onset was logged in 60 of 62 segmented TacGELLO grasp intervals. Median commanded closure after tactile or width-based contact references was 0.7--2.1,mm with TacGELLO and 13.0--13.9,mm with the original interface.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Jul 31, 2026cs.RO

TacPrint: A Wearable Fingertip Tactile Sensor for Human-to-Robot Contact Reproduction

Human-centric data collection is emerging as a significant paradigm for robot skill acquisition, but seamlessly integrating low-cost, scalable tactile sensing systems that capture fine-grained fingertip interactions without compromising natural operation remains a key challenge. This reduces the reliability of human-to-robot transfer in contact-rich tasks. In this work, we present TacPrint, a wearable fingertip tactile sensor, where protrusions on the inner surface of the silicone skin are aligned one-to-one with 24 capacitive taxels to enable localized capacitive responses. A real-to-sim-to-real pipeline estimates a 35 ×\times 26 contact-depth map from 24-channel capacitive signals. Against simulation-generated labels, the model achieved a contact-region RMSE of 0.223 ±\pm 0.161 mm, a weighted-centroid error of 1.213 ±\pm 2.379 pixels, and an IoU of 0.829 ±\pm 0.169. With measured capacitive inputs, the network-predicted depth evaluated at the guide-calibrated contact center showed a mean absolute error of 0.085 ±\pm 0.057 mm across all 40 controlled trials, while the mean contact-position error was 0.250 ±\pm 0.208 mm across the 37 trials whose reference contact regions were not truncated by the sensing boundary. In human-to-robot replay, tactile-guided compensation increased grasping and wiping success rates from 0% to 91.67% and 90%, respectively. In closed-loop grasping, dense-depth feedback achieved success rates of 87.5% over all tested positions and 85% under edge-contact conditions, compared with 67.5% and 45% for raw-taxel feedback.
Jul 10, 2026cs.RO

TACTIC: Tactile and Vision Conditioned Contact-Centric Control for Whole-Arm Manipulation

Whole-arm manipulation involves direct contact with the environment while the robot completes a task by distributing contact across multiple links as contacts form, slide, and break. This setting breaks common implicit assumptions in many learning-based manipulation pipelines: arm configuration tightly couples motion and contact forces, contact state is partially observed under occlusion, and purely learned rollouts can become physically inconsistent under distribution shift because many multi-link contact configurations are sparsely represented in the data. To address this, we propose TACTIC (Tactile and Vision Conditioned Contact-Centric Control), a receding-horizon controller for whole-arm manipulation. TACTIC uses a contact-centric hybrid predictive model that combines RGB-D, distributed tactile sensing, and a compact 2D proximity representation. The model couples a learned, action-conditioned latent dynamics model with analytical kinematics through contact Jacobians, enabling rollouts of future contact configurations and interaction forces. TACTIC integrates these rollouts into a sampling-based MPC planner with contact-aware action sampling: contact Jacobian-based projections steer sampled action sequences toward force-modulating directions, and objectives defined over predicted proximity and interaction forces trade task progress against whole-arm force regulation. We evaluate TACTIC in simulation against state-of-the-art model-based and model-free methods, and perform ablations that isolate the contribution of each design choice. TACTIC consistently outperforms other methods. We further demonstrate real-world performance on a robot with distributed tactile sensing across three whole-arm manipulation tasks that require multi-contact trajectories: turning over and repositioning a manikin, and goal-reaching in a 3D dynamic maze. Website: https://emprise.cs.cornell.edu/tactic
Sep 14, 2026cs.RO

PredTac: Learning Contact-Rich Manipulation with Predicted Touch

Contact-rich manipulation benefits from tactile feedback, yet physical tactile sensors introduce hardware, calibration, synchronization, and maintenance costs that complicate policy learning and deployment. We formulate predicted touch as an alternative to measured tactile input and present PredTac, a framework that learns to infer tactile states from causal visual observations and robot states and uses the predicted touch as an explicit interface for policy learning and execution. A tactile predictor is first trained with tactile supervision and then used to provide contact information without requiring measured tactile input during downstream policy training or execution. We evaluate PredTac across three contact-rich manipulation tasks in simulation and on a real robot, and further examine how policy performance depends on the predicted contact content. In simulation goal-offset evaluations, predicted-touch policies achieve 27.0%, 52.0%, and 44.7% success on USB, Barbed-spike, and Valve, respectively, improving over the visual baseline by 8.0-13.7 percentage points. On the real robot, predicted-touch ACT achieves 70.0%, 50.0%, and 90.0% success on USB insertion, Barbed extraction, and Valve rotation, respectively, with a three-task mean of 70.0%, approaching measured-touch ACT at 72.2% and substantially outperforming visual ACT at 21.1%. Fixed-policy interventions further show that performance is sensitive to the spatial structure of predicted contact, with spatial rearrangement at fixed value distributions reducing Valve success by 10.7 percentage points. These results demonstrate that predicted touch can provide useful contact information for contact-rich manipulation without requiring tactile sensing as a policy input.