Behavioral Cloning Mystery

Neural behavior cloning compresses demonstrations into large models, making individual actions difficult to trace and policy updates costly. Retrieval policies retain access to demonstrations but struggle with mismatch between recorded and live behavior. We introduce Behavior Predictive Control (BPC), which synthesizes policies without end-to-end policy training by combining an action-aware retrieval metric, a Hankel-based action-continuation prior, and a closed-form one-step residual correction. Inspired by behavioral systems theory, BPC predicts future actions by blending stored observation-action data that best reconstructs the recent runtime observation--action history. Across simulated benchmarks and real-robot deployments, BPC is competitive with learned policies such as $π_{0.5}$ (surpassing it in some cases), while reducing policy fitting from hours to seconds on consumer GPUs and supporting closed-loop control upwards of 75 Hz on a Jetson Orin Nano. The retrieved demonstration windows and their coefficients also provide an intrinsic estimate of task progress. Retaining demonstrations within the deployed policy makes its predictions traceable to supporting trajectories and enables behavior revision through the demonstration bank.

We introduce ABC, a fully open-source stack for manipulation with behavior cloning. At its core is ABC-130K: the largest open-source teleoperation dataset to date, featuring 3,500 hours of data spanning over 130K episodes across 195 diverse tasks. Furthermore, we open-source our accessible hardware setup, training infrastructure, and simulation pipeline. We also release 400 hours of sim-teleop data and provide a co-training recipe that produces correlated simulation and real-world evaluation, offering a reliable proxy for ablating model-design and training decisions before costly real-world evaluation. We explore various training recipes and compare common architectural choices for Diffusion Transformers (DiT) and Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models, grounding our findings in real-world evaluations. The resulting policies successfully execute dexterous tasks such as box folding and extracting credit cards from wallets. By providing a reproducible toolkit, we aim to place researchers on an equal footing, establishing the necessary foundation to learn the ABCs of Behavior Cloning together as a community.

Generalist manipulation policies are increasingly presented as foundation models for robotic control, but their real-world generalization remains difficult to diagnose. A policy may succeed on demonstrated tasks while still failing to execute fine-grained atomic skills or recombine learned skills in new task structures. We introduce \textbf{ATOM-Bench}, a real-world benchmark for evaluating both atomic skills and compositional generalization in manipulation policies. ATOM-Bench factorizes tabletop manipulation into motor atoms and instruction atoms, and contains 30 atomic tasks and 24 held-out compositional tasks across paired single-arm and dual-arm robot tracks. We collect 3,000 human demonstrations for atomic fine-tuning and release both the demonstration data and evaluation rollout data to support reproducible real-world evaluation. Policies are fine-tuned on atomic tasks and evaluated on both atomic skill acquisition and held-out compositional tasks. We further introduce Atomic Score (AS) and Compositional Failure Share (CFS) to distinguish failures caused by weak atomic skills from failures caused by limited compositional reuse. Through 2,700 physical rollouts on five representative manipulation policies, we find that current policies can acquire simple instruction-grounding skills, but still struggle with fine-grained motor atoms, counting, and logical filtering. More importantly, strong atomic performance does not reliably transfer to held-out compositional tasks. ATOM-Bench provides a diagnostic testbed for studying whether failures arise from weak motor execution, poor instruction grounding, or limited compositional reuse.