One Block, Multiple Depths: Recurrent Vision Transformers with Depth-Programmed Experts

Vision Transformers (ViTs) implement depth by stacking independently parameterized blocks, but it remains unclear how much of this parameterization is necessary and how much can be replaced by recurrent reuse. We study this question with bViT, a single-block recurrent ViT that repeatedly applies the same transformer block while preserving the iterative computation of a deep model. On ImageNet-1K, bViT-B reaches 0.779 validation accuracy compared with 0.789 for ViT-B under the same training recipe and computational budget, while using 8.6M rather than 86.6M parameters. This correspondence becomes stronger with model width, while narrow recurrent models exhibit a substantial performance gap. Beyond classification, the single-block formulation provides a controlled testbed for studying how transformer computation evolves with depth, since the same heads, neurons, and weight matrices can be tracked across recurrent steps. Analyses of attention, activation patterns, and step-conditioned spectral pruning reveal temporally organized behavior and step-dependent utilization of the shared parameters. bViT also transfers competitively to downstream tasks while enabling highly parameter-efficient adaptation. Our work shows that much of the performance associated with independently parameterized ViT depth can be recovered through recurrent reuse of a single sufficiently wide transformer block.

Vision Transformers (ViTs) achieve state-of-the-art segmentation accuracy but require large training datasets because each layer has unique parameters that must be learned independently. We present RD-ViT, a Recurrent-Depth Vision Transformer that adapts the Recurrent-Depth Transformer (RDT) architecture to dense prediction tasks, supporting both 2D and 3D inputs. RD-ViT replaces the deep stack of unique transformer blocks with a single shared block looped T times, augmented with LTI-stable state injection for guaranteed convergence, Adaptive Computation Time (ACT) for spatial compute allocation, depth-wise LoRA adaptation, and optional Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) feed-forward networks for category-specific specialization. We evaluate on the ACDC cardiac MRI segmentation benchmark in both 2D slice-level and 3D volumetric settings with exclusively real experiments executed in Google Colab. In 2D, RD-ViT outperforms standard ViT at 10% training data (Dice 0.774 vs 0.762) and at full data (0.882 vs 0.872). In 3D, RD-ViT with MoE achieves Dice 0.812 with 3.0M parameters, reaching 99.4% of standard ViT performance (0.817) at 53% of the parameter count. MoE expert utilization analysis reveals that different experts spontaneously specialize for different cardiac structures (RV, MYO, LV) without explicit routing supervision. ACT halting maps show higher compute allocation at cardiac boundaries, and the mean ponder time decreases from 2.6 to 1.4 iterations during training, demonstrating learned computational efficiency. Depth extrapolation enables inference with more loops than training without degradation. All code, notebooks, and results are publicly released.

Vision Transformers (ViTs) achieve strong image-recognition performance, but their parameter count grows linearly with depth when each block is independently parameterized. Single-block recurrent ViTs (bViT) remove this growth by repeatedly applying one shared block. Rather than proposing a new architecture, we fix a bViT and provide a controlled empirical characterization of three training and inference regimes under a common CIFAR-100 protocol, asking: (i)~when does recurrence beat independently parameterized depth---at matched FLOPs or at matched parameter memory? (ii)~when a residual recurrent block is trained through an ODE solver, does solver order act as numerical refinement or as an architectural bias? and (iii)~what does robustness beyond the training horizon cost in nominal accuracy? We find that standard ViTs remain preferable when FLOPs are the primary constraint, whereas recurrent ViTs offer a better accuracy--parameter trade-off under memory constraints. Consistent with the standard view of residual networks as Euler discretizations of ODEs, the continuous-time analogue of a residual recurrent block is the state-subtracted vector field $\dot{z}=F_θ(z)-z$; although known in principle, this distinction is easy to violate when the block is wrapped as a black-box vector field, and we qualify the cost at few accuracy points. Because the vector field is learned jointly with the solver, higher-order solvers act as a solver-induced architectural bias rather than a numerical-accuracy improvement, and their gains are not uniform. Finally, stage-wise deep supervision traces an accuracy--robustness frontier: it does not improve nominal accuracy, but degrades gracefully far beyond the training horizon, where naive recurrence collapses to near-random performance.