Data augmentation is standard practice for low-resource automatic speech recognition (ASR), but its benefits are almost always reported as aggregate error rates, leaving open why and when a method helps. On four low-resource languages and English at five data sizes, we cross two augmentations that modify existing audio (speed perturbation and SpecAugment) with two that modify text transcriptions and synthesize audio from it. We analyze errors at the phoneme level and find that they help for complementary reasons. SpecAugment has the most reliable aggregate improvements, but increases tone and palatalization errors, whereas text-based methods introduce consonant insertions; in combination, each reduces the errors the other introduces. This complementarity is predictable. Tone and palatalization are each signaled by a single acoustic property and occur least frequently in training (lowest training exposure), and text-based methods that flatten word frequency raise their frequency by 37--38%, reversing those errors while further improving aggregate error. The improvement from combining the methods exceeds the sum of their individual improvements; the superadditivity vanishes by 100 hours, limiting the complementarity to the low-resource regime. Where specific error types matter, we recommend selecting augmentation by training exposure and acoustic properties, both measurable before any training.
Synthetic speech can provide additional supervision for automatic speech recognition (ASR), but constructing useful synthetic training data requires choosing both what to synthesize and how to synthesize it. We present a phoneme-guided text-to-speech (TTS) augmentation pipeline for ASR that connects multilingual speech generation with candidate-text selection and reference-speech quality control. Within this pipeline, we propose phoneme-frequency-guided selection (PFGS), which uses phoneme frequencies from real ASR training transcripts to prioritize candidate texts containing common phonetic content. Experiments with separate monolingual ASR systems cover four languages and 13 test sets. With random text selection, the pipeline improves recognition on 11 test sets at one or more synthesis ratios. PFGS further outperforms random selection on nine test sets, with relative word error rate (WER) reductions of up to 19.3%. An ablation with fixed target texts and synthesis counts further shows the benefit of reference-speech filtering. These results support using real-data phoneme statistics to guide the construction of effective synthetic supervision for ASR.
Zhen Wang, TianRui Wu, RongQi Han +3
Shanghai Qi Zhi Institute, Shanghai, China · Megatronix (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd. · Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Automatic speech recognition (ASR) has improved substantially in recent years, yet performance remains limited for low-resource languages. Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for improving ASR through generative error correction (GER), but their effectiveness in low-resource settings remains underexplored. In addition, it remains unclear to what extent data contamination influences the reported improvements in LLM-based GER. This study investigates LLM-based GER for low-resource Frisian. In addition to a public corpus, we construct and use a Frisian offline dataset with non-public texts for evaluation to control for potential data contamination. Results show that GER improves ASR performance in most settings, with the best GPT-5.1 results surpassing oracle WERs. Comparable gains on the offline dataset indicate that improvements reflect true correction ability. We further provide a detailed error analysis revealing model correction patterns.
Synthetic accented speech is a promising way to improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) when real accented recordings are scarce. We ask what makes such data useful for ASR fine-tuning: target-accent phoneme edits that expose the recognizer to accent-specific pronunciations, or random phoneme perturbations that act as augmentation in phoneme space. In a few-shot TTS pipeline, we compare LLM-generated accent edits with matched-rate random substitutions and oracle controls using ground-truth accented phonemes and prosody. Random substitutions recover much of the ASR gain: LLM target-accent edits improve over random by only a small margin, ground-truth phonemes stay close to the random baseline and nearly converge with it as the synthetic ASR fine-tuning set grows larger, and adding ground-truth prosody yields only a modest further gain. Mixing synthetic with real accented speech also stabilizes low-resource fine-tuning, but a fixed synthetic budget can later dilute the information in real data, showing that the real--synthetic ratio matters.
Yurii Halychanskyi, Nimet Beyza Bozdag, Mark Hasegawa-Johnson +2
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, USA · National Center for Supercomputing Applications, USA