Co-adaptive Rule Routing and Constraining for Structured Knowledge Retrieval

Adaptive RAG often uses retrieval-time signals to decide whether another retrieval, reranking, or multimodal step should run. We ask whether these signals add routing value once the query itself is already known. Across document, audio, and video RAG, we compare matched query-only and query+retrieval routers while holding the optional actions, router family, training procedure, and evaluation fixed. On the held-out final evaluation, adding the tested retrieval signals does not produce a reliable routing improvement over the query-only baseline. Some retrieval signals are associated with whether a later step will help, but that predictability does not consistently lead to bet- ter RUN/SKIP decisions. The main lesson is therefore methodological: retrieval-state features should not be credited with routing value unless they improve over a matched query-only control. Our results do not show that routing or retrieval state is generally useless; they show that the incremental value of retrieval signals must be demonstrated rather than assumed.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines typically rely on a fixed indexing and retrieval configuration determined at preprocessing time. This one-size-fits-all design is ill-suited to domain-expert settings, where heterogeneous queries require different chunking granularities, metadata constraints, and source-selection strategies. As a result, configurations that are effective for one family of queries often perform poorly for others. In this paper, we introduce ORDER (Optimal Routing for Dynamic Evidence Retrieval), a query-conditioned RAG framework that jointly adapts indexing and retrieval to the incoming query. Our approach first discovers semantic clusters over a given set of questions associated to a corpus and learns, for each cluster, a chunking strategy together with a suited metadata filtering and reranking configuration. At inference time, queries are routed to the appropriate pre-built index through nearest-centroid assignment. To further improve retrieval, we propose a supervised query router (QRe) that predicts which collections are most likely to contain relevant evidence, coupled with a Uniform Multi-source Sampler (UMS) that allocates the retrieval budget evenly across the selected sources. We evaluate our framework on large-scale, heterogeneous historical archives and show that conditioning both indexing and retrieval on the query consistently outperforms both naive baselines and strong state-of-the-art RAG systems in complex expert-domain environments.

Retrieval is the first stage of modern search and advertising systems, selecting a candidate set from a large item universe for downstream ranking and auction. Recent work increasingly leverages LLMs to improve retrieval through query expansion, data synthesis, and retrieval-feedback training. However, the generative component is typically used for query-side augmentation, while final matching is still delegated to a downstream retriever. We introduce CoGR, a retrieval framework that instead trains LLMs to directly construct retrieval representations on both query and item sides. Each generator produces a compact set of keywords, which are matched directly through an inverted index, preserving compatibility with existing keyword-based retrieval infrastructure. CoGR uses a two-stage training pipeline. Supervised fine-tuning first establishes an aligned keyword space, after which co-evolving reinforcement learning alternately optimizes the query- and item-side generators with GRPO against the opposite side's frozen index. Both sides optimize the same query-to-item retrieval $F_1$ objective: the query side receives retrieval $F_1$ directly, while the item side receives a counterfactual marginal reward measuring the change in query-side $F_1$ caused by its generated keywords. Across 10 representative sparse, dense, and generative baselines, CoGR achieves the best performance on both an internal APP Marketplace dataset and the public WANDS benchmark, improving $F_1$ over the strongest baseline by $10.9\%$ and $36.1\%$, respectively. Further analysis shows stable co-evolution and increasingly aligned query--item keyword spaces over training.