RM-WAM: Reliable Memory-Augmented World Action Models for Long-Horizon Robot Manipulation
Authors: Cui Miao, Junhao Yu, Ping Liu, Ning Yang, Xuhua Chen, He Zheng, Xiaodong Wang, Tao Zhang
Organizations: National University of Defense Technology · Magic-Lab Team, Magiclab Robotics Inc. · Beijing Institute of Technology · Nanjing University
World Action Models (WAMs) improve robotic manipulation by jointly predicting future visual states and actions, yet most existing methods make decisions primarily from the current observation. This limits their reliability in long-horizon tasks, where visually similar states may correspond to different interaction histories and task stages. Moreover, directly incorporating historical observations can introduce stale, stage-mismatched, or error-contaminated information, leading to inaccurate world prediction and accumulated closed-loop errors. We propose RM-WAM, a reliable memory-augmented World Action Model that treats memory as a context-dependent predictive resource rather than universally useful historical context. RM-WAM represents history using complementary short-term visual state memory and latent event memory, which respectively capture recent interaction dynamics and longer-term state transitions. A counterfactual memory learning scheme varies the accessible history while keeping the current inputs and prediction targets fixed, enabling the model to learn a context-dependent utility estimate for historical memory. Based on this estimate, a utility-aware gating mechanism adaptively controls memory injection into the world-action backbone. Experiments demonstrate that RM-WAM highlights the importance of reliable and selective memory utilization in long-horizon tasks.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Motivation of RM-WAM. (a) Existing memory-augmented VLAs use memory for action prediction, but retrieved memory is not always useful and they do not model future world prediction. (b) RM-WAM evaluates memory utility and incorporates reliable memory into a WAM for both world prediction and action generation.
Fig. 2: Overview of RM-WAM. The left panel shows the overall world-action framework with selective memory injection, while the right panel details the construction of the dual-scale memory.
Method
Spatial
Object
Goal
Long
Avg.
DP
78.3%
92.5%
68.3%
50.5%
72.4%
π0.5
98.8%
98.2%
98.0%
92.4%
96.9%
HiMem-WAM
98.2%
99.8%
98.4%
94.5%
97.7%
FastWAM
98.2%
100.0%
97.0%
95.2%
97.6%
RM-WAM (Ours)
98.8%
100.0%
98.2%
97.0%
98.5%
TABLE I: Comparisons with other baselines on Libero benchmark. Success rates(%) are reported, and bold denotes the best performance among all methods.
Task
DP
π0.5
FastWAM
HiMem-WAM
RM-WAM
Observe Pick Up
1%
9%
0%
28%
27%
Rearrange Blocks
0%
13%
0%
33%
65%
Put Back Block
0%
11%
0%
32%
70%
Swap Blocks
11%
24%
0%
38%
62%
Swap T
2%
15%
7%
27%
58%
Battery Try
10%
16%
20%
28%
30%
TABLE II: Comparisons with baselines on RMBench. Success rates (%) are reported, and bold denotes the best performance.
Fig. 3: Real-world long-horizon tabletop organization task. The task consists of three sequential manipulation subtasks, denoted by ①–③, requiring the robot to complete multiple object organization steps over an extended temporal horizon.
Method
Standard
Disturbance
Unseen
FastWAM
80.0
70.0
76.7
RM-WAM
90.0
83.3
86.7
TABLE III: Real-world evaluation results. Success rates (%) are reported, and bold denotes the best performance.
Fig. 4: Visualization of short-term visual memory in RM-WAM. The top row shows spatial attention over recent historical observations, and the bottom row shows the corresponding raw observations together with the current frame. The right panel shows the short-memory utility coefficient learned through counterfactual memory supervision.
Fig. 5: Visualization of latent event memory in RM-WAM. The model attends to earlier event eτ when returning the block to its original position.
Fig. 6: Visualization of future evolution on LIBERO-Long.
Method
Goal
Object
Spatial
Long
Avg.
w/o short-mem.
97.0
100.0
97.8
96.0
97.7
w/o event-mem.
96.8
100.0
98.2
95.0
97.5
RM-WAM
98.2
100.0
98.8
97.0
98.5
TABLE IV: Ablation study on LIBERO. Success rates (%) are reported, and bold denotes the best performance.
Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASIA), Beijing, China · Shenzhen Yinwang Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China · FiveAges, Beijing, China