cs.LGOct 14, 2026

Clinically Interpretable Biological Age Estimation Using CatBoost and SHAP with Continuous and Categorical Features from NHANES

Authors: Yanni Sun, Zheng Qu, Kevin Ren, Zhanglin Lin Cui

Organizations: Northern Center for Learning and Innovation, Middletown, New York, USA

Abstract

Biological age (BA) captures inter-individual variation in physiological aging beyond chronological age (CA). Although machine-learning models have advanced BA estimation, many rely primarily on continuous laboratory biomarkers, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) dependence plots are typically interpreted visually. We developed a clinically interpretable machine-learning framework for BA estimation using heterogeneous clinical data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2011-March 2020, N = 24,983 adults aged >= 18). A CatBoost regression model incorporated 44 demographic, laboratory, physical examination, and lifestyle predictors to estimate CA, defining model-estimated age as BA. SHAP provided multi-level interpretability. Crucially, building on standard visual inspection, we implemented a prespecified automated procedure directly on SHAP dependence plots to quantify feature-value ranges associated with lowest and highest BA contributions, corresponding adjustment magnitudes, and zero-crossing thresholds. Model-estimated BA strongly correlated with CA in held-out testing data (Pearson r = 0.798, P < 0.001). Population-level SHAP identified blood urea nitrogen, serum glucose, vigorous recreational activity, red cell distribution width, and alanine aminotransferase among the leading predictors, with three categorical variables ranking among the top 25. Automated quantitative SHAP analysis mapped predictor-specific ranges, effect sizes, and inflection points, while waterfall plots enabled individual explanations. By extending qualitative visual interpretation to reproducible quantitative metrics across heterogeneous clinical data, this framework enhances transparency and provides a scalable methodological foundation for biological aging research and precision health.

Explore similar work

Sep 26, 2026

Using Machine Learning to Investigate Predictors of Fasting Blood Glucose: Insights into Circadian Timing and Age Interactions

Impaired glucose regulation is a major contributor to metabolic dysfunction and type 2 diabetes. This study developed an interpretable machine-learning framework to predict log-transformed fasting blood glucose using metabolic, hormonal, lifestyle, demographic, nutritional, and circadian variables from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017--2020 pre-pandemic dataset. After merging multiple NHANES sub-datasets, data processing used a leakage-resistant pipeline in which imputation, scaling, and one-hot encoding were performed only after dataset splitting and within training folds. Elastic Net, LASSO, and XGBoost models were evaluated using 94 candidate predictors and engineered circadian interaction terms. Performance was assessed using mean absolute error, root mean squared error, coefficient of determination, calibration, and Shapley Additive Explanations. The final interaction-augmented XGBoost model achieved strong performance on the independent test set, with a mean absolute error of 0.0804, a root mean squared error of 0.1148, and a coefficient of determination of 0.7761, using 10 predictors. Glycohemoglobin was the dominant predictor, followed by insulin, diabetes diagnosis, gamma-glutamyl transferase, age, race, and gender. Among the engineered interaction terms, sleep midpoint multiplied by age was consistently retained in repeated random-split analyses, although its contribution remained modest relative to dominant glycaemic predictors. These findings support further investigation of circadian-age interactions in metabolic health.
Mar 14, 2026

Benchmarking Open-Source PPG Foundation Models for Biological Age Prediction

A task-specific model trained on 212,231 UK Biobank subjects to predict vascular age from PPG (AI-PPG Age) fails on a different clinical population: predictions collapse to a narrow 38-67 year range regardless of true age. Meanwhile, a general-purpose foundation model with no age-related training objective achieves lower error on the same data. We investigate why this happens and what it means for PPG-based biological age prediction. We evaluate three open-source PPG models (Pulse-PPG, PaPaGei-S, AI-PPG Age) on 906 surgical patients from PulseDB, using frozen embeddings with Ridge regression and 5-fold cross-validation. Pulse-PPG reaches MAE = 9.28 years, beating both AI-PPG Age in linear probe mode (9.72) and HR/HRV combined with demographics (9.59). Adding demographic features brings the best result down to MAE = 8.22 years (R2 = 0.517, r = 0.725). The predicted age gap correlates with diastolic blood pressure after adjusting for chronological age (r = -0.188, p = 1.2e-8), consistent with what Apple reported for their proprietary PpgAge model. The remaining gap with Apple (MAE 2.43) appears driven by dataset size (906 vs 213,593 subjects) and population differences rather than model architecture, as our learning curve shows no plateau. Code is publicly available.
Sep 16, 2026

Machine-Learning Assessment of the Predictive Value of Inflammatory Biomarkers for Cognitive Impairment in an Older Hispanic Adult Cohort

Small clinical tabular datasets require interpretable machine learning because deep learning is often impractical and ensemble models can be difficult to inspect. A key pitfall is that statistical significance does not necessarily imply predictive utility. Using data from the Panama Aging Research Initiative--Health Disparities (PARI-HD) cohort (n=165), we implemented a leakage-safe threshold-likelihood Bernoulli/Categorical Naive Bayes (BNB/CNB) classifier. Within every training fold, each continuous predictor was reduced to a supervised chi-square-derived state, while income entered the model through a categorical likelihood. All data-dependent steps were performed within repeated stratified 10-fold cross-validation with 30 repeats. The demographic baseline achieved a ROC-AUC of 0.630 +/- 0.017. I-309 (CCL1) was the dominant incremental feature, increasing AUC by 0.110, with paired DeLong tests yielding p<0.05 in 100% of repeats. In the pre-specified primary analysis, I-309 produced a fixed-partition DeLong p=0.0018, with robustness assessed across 200 random partitions, where the median p-value was 0.0011. Within the exploratory family of 18 candidate markers, I-309 achieved a Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted q=0.032 on the frozen partition and satisfied q<0.05 in 85% of random partitions, whereas no other marker demonstrated reliable incremental predictive value. Because the fitted model is an inspectable table of thresholds and class-conditional probabilities, these results identify I-309/CCL1 as an interpretable candidate feature for tabular prediction of cognitive impairment, pending external validation.