Enhancing Multimodal RLVR with Pairwise Token Contrast and Adaptive Trajectory Confidence

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) improves multimodal reasoning by rewarding verifiable final answers. Yet answer-correct trajectories may still rely on incomplete derivations, weak evidence, or statements that contradict their conclusions. This gap between answer correctness and reasoning validity, which we call reasoning-answer inconsistency, motivates trajectory supervision in multimodal RL. We compare two main approaches: reward models (RMs), and Generative Rewards (GRs). RMs are efficient and help early in training, but their gains weaken as the policy distribution shifts; GRs improve performance, but may give unstable rewards and computationally expensive. We therefore propose Groupwise Ranking Reward, which ranks verifier-passed trajectories for the same prompt in one pass and redistributes reward accordingly. Groupwise comparison better separates stronger and weaker correct trajectories with lower judge overhead than GRs. Experiments show that RLVR aggravates reasoning-answer inconsistency, while trajectory supervision alleviates it. Groupwise Ranking Reward performs best overall, improving reliability-conditioned accuracy from 47.4% to 54.7% over RLVR.

Extending Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to multimodal large language models (MLLMs) faces a fundamental challenge: their responses inherently interleave perception-related tokens, which ground visual content, with reasoning-related tokens, which construct reasoning chains. These token types instantiate distinct yet interdependent capacities -- visual grounding and symbolic reasoning -- making isolated optimization insufficient. Through token-level empirical analysis, we demonstrate that optimizing either perception- or reasoning-only tokens consistently underperforms full optimization, underscoring their inherent coupling. To address this, we propose a plug-and-play Token-Reweighting (ToR) strategy that explicitly models this interdependence by identifying critical tokens of both types and dynamically reweighting them during RLVR training. Applied on top of existing methods (e.g., GRPO and DAPO), ToR delivers consistent performance gains across multiple multi-modal reasoning benchmarks, achieving state-of-the-art performance with both accurate visual grounding and coherent reasoning.

Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has improved the reasoning capabilities of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), yet existing frameworks rely on coarse, sequence-level reward signals that lack the fine-grained supervision over the visually-grounded steps within a multimodal reasoning chain. We investigate this gap through the lens of two token-level metrics: visual dependency (i.e. how much a token's prediction relies on the input image features) and predictive entropy. Our empirical analysis reveals two key findings: (1) correct reasoning chains exhibit a markedly sharper entropy reduction as visual grounding intensifies, compared to incorrect ones; (2) pivotal tokens, those whose misprediction triggers reasoning collapse, are statistical outliers in the joint distribution of visual dependency and predictive entropy derived from correct chains. Motivated by these findings, we propose token-level perception-grounded advantage estimation (TPAE), which estimates token-level advantages by measuring each token's statistical consistency with the vision-entropy patterns of correct rollouts. TPAE leverages this granular score to modulate the sequence-level advantage, producing a fine-grained supervision signal that can be integrated into various RLVR frameworks. Extensive experiments on seven benchmarks show that TPAE consistently outperforms leading strong baselines, yielding more stable and efficient optimization for multimodal reasoning. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/Zhihan72/TPAE.