From Adult Renal Masses to Pediatric Wilms Tumors: Evaluating Cross-Domain Generalization of Kidney Lesion Segmentation on MRI
Authors: Sarah de Boer, Myrthe A. D. Buser, Hartmut Häntze, Jawed Nawabi, Lisa C. Adams, Alida F. W. van der Steeg, Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Annemieke S. Littooij, Keno K. Bressem, Mathias Prokop, Alessa Hering
Organizations: Department of Medical Imaging, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands · Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany · Department of Neuroradiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany · Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany · Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands · Wilhelmina Children’s Hospital, Division of Childhealth, Utrecht, The Netherlands · Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands · National Center for Tumor Diseases West, Essen, Germany · Institute of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany · Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Deep learning segmentation models for pediatric oncology are often trained on small, single-center cohorts, whereas much larger datasets exist for adult diseases, such as kidney cancer. Whether models trained on adult renal lesions generalize to pediatric Wilms tumors remains unclear. We trained a segmentation model on single-sequence T1- or T2-weighted adult kidney MRI and evaluated it on a held-out adult test set and a pediatric Wilms tumor cohort, where it was compared with a pediatric-specific nnU-Net. Segmentation performance was quantified using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th-percentile Hausdorff distance. On the adult test set, the model achieved a median DSC of 0.86 for renal lesions. On the pediatric cohort, the adult-trained model achieved a median DSC of 0.85 compared with 0.90 for the pediatric-specific model. Despite differences in age, anatomy, and tumor type, the adult-trained model showed promising performance on pediatric Wilms tumors, with only a modest difference in median DSC compared with the pediatric-specific model. However, non-inferiority could not be shown, highlighting the value of pediatric training data. In future work, a fine-tuning strategy could be explored.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: (a) Semi-supervised model training: MRSegmentator was used to localize both kidneys. A temporary nnU-Net was trained on manually annotated crops and used to generate pseudo-labels for previously unlabeled kidneys. Manual and automatic annotations were then merged to train the final model. (b) Tumor examples from the adult and pediatric cohorts.
Adult cohort
Pediatric cohort
Institution
Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology
Use in this study
Training and in-domain test
External test (zero-shot)
Patients (sequences)
689 (1794)
45 (45)
Training
551 (1435)
–
Test
138 (359)
45 (45)
Age range
38–74 \ts years
7–109 \ts months
Table 1: Overview of the adult and pediatric cohorts. Renal mass volume is reported as the median and interquartile range.
Figure 2: Case-level DSC comparison between the adult- and pediatric-trained models on the Wilms tumor cohort.
Figure 3: Subgroup analysis comparing the performance (in DSC) per patient age group for the adult (left) and pediatric (right) models.
Medical image segmentation delineates organs, lesions, and other structures in scans to support measurement, diagnosis, treatment planning, and research.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Imaging and Cancer Division, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands · University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Centre (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg, Germany · Princess Máxima Centre for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands +3
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Radiology, Berlin, Germany · Radboudumc, Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Nijmegen, The Netherlands · Klinikum rechts der Isar, TUM University Hospital, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany +2