Beyond the Teacher: Understanding and Preserving Distillation Overshoot in Agentic On-Policy Distillation

On-policy distillation (OPD) has become a standard approach for transferring capabilities from large teachers to compact students. Its cost, however, is dominated by autoregressive student rollouts and scales poorly in multi-turn agentic settings. Existing acceleration methods truncate or relocate the supervision signal according to fixed, offline budgets, despite substantial variation in teacher-signal reliability both within and across trajectories. Our empirical analysis on $τ^2$-bench reveals a clear structure in this variation: informative supervision is concentrated in the prefix of each turn, and, most importantly for multi-turn agentic training, the cross-turn loss of teacher endorsement is temporally locked to the student's first erroneous action rather than accumulating gradually over turns. Building on these findings, we propose STRIDE (Stop-and-Restart on-policy Distillation acceleration), which combines two complementary techniques: adaptive early stopping, which terminates a rollout once the cumulative teacher log-probability falls below an out-of-distribution threshold, and a prefix buffer, which caches high-quality prefixes and restarts generation at the weakest correct turn. Together, these mechanisms induce a data-driven curriculum that progressively extends coverage to later turns. On $τ^2$-bench retail, our method matches full-trajectory OPD and exceeds the 30B teacher at a $3.73\times$ speedup, surpasses the baseline itself at $2.34\times$, and retains a $4.51\times$ speedup under cross-domain multi-teacher training. As a supplementary generalization test beyond the agentic setting, STRIDE outperforms full OPD on AIME 2025 at a $5.10\times$ speedup and on AIME 2024 at a $3.08\times$ speedup; averaged across the two evaluations, both fixed-budget truncation baselines remain below full OPD.

On-policy distillation (OPD) provides teacher supervision on states visited by the student, reducing the distribution gap between training and inference. However, in multi-turn agentic tasks, student deviations may accumulate over time, gradually moving the trajectory away from states where teacher guidance remains effective. Our quantitative analysis further shows that high-disagreement states offer promising opportunities for teacher guidance, but determining whether such guidance is beneficial requires examining its effect on subsequent student trajectories. We propose FutureBridge-OPD (FTB), which executes a short teacher bridge at a high disagreement state and uses the resulting student continuation to assess whether the bridge increases the density of positive distillation signals relative to the teacher. On ALFWorld, WebShop, and ScienceWorld, under the main Qwen3-32B teacher to Qwen3-1.7B student setting, FTB outperforms vanilla OPD and TCOD by an average of 16.6 and 7.6 points, respectively, and remains effective across student scales and teacher settings. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/ChenChiShui/FutureBridge-OPD.

On-policy distillation (OPD) trains a student on its own trajectories under token-level teacher supervision, but existing methods are capped by a single-teacher capability ceiling: when the teacher errs, the student inherits the error. OPD also remains largely unexplored in agentic tasks, where per-step errors compound across long trajectories and destabilize training. We propose MAD-OPD (Multi-Agent Debate-driven On-Policy Distillation), which breaks this ceiling by recasting the distillation teacher as a deliberative collective of teachers that debate over the student's on-policy state; the debate produces an emergent collective intelligence that supplies token-level supervision, with each teacher's contribution weighted by its post-debate confidence. To extend OPD to agentic tasks, we also introduce On-Policy Agentic Distillation (OPAD), which adds step-level sampling to stabilize training under multi-step error compounding. We additionally derive a task-adaptive divergence principle, selecting JSD (Jensen-Shannon divergence) for agentic stability and reverse KL (Kullback-Leibler) divergence for code generation, and verify it both theoretically and empirically. Across six teacher-student configurations (Qwen3 and Qwen3.5; 1.7B-14B students, 8B-32B teachers) and five agentic and code benchmarks, MAD-OPD ranks first across all six configurations; on the 14B+8B$\to$4B setting it lifts the agentic average by $+2.4\%$ and the code average by $+3.7\%$ over the stronger single-teacher OPD.