GreenNIDS: A Benchmark Workflow and Analysis Dataset for NetFlow Intrusion Detection Experiments

Modern network intrusion detection systems (NIDS) are caught in a structural contradiction: the protocols carrying the highest threat intelligence are precisely those encrypted under TLS 1.3 and QUIC, where payload inspection yields nothing. We ask a simpler question -- what if the attack signature is not in the bytes, but in the rhythm? -- and answer it by treating network flows as a language whose grammar is written entirely in L3/L4 packet metadata: length, inter-arrival time, TTL, TCP flags, and hashed port numbers. We present PLM-NIDS, which proves three claims in sequence. (1) The grammar exists and is learnable: a RWKV-4 state-space model trained on 344,232 unlabelled Monday flows achieves a causal LM validation loss of 0.204, demonstrating that benign traffic has predictable, statistically consistent structure. (2) Attacks violate this grammar: the per-flow perplexity score cleanly separates benign from attack flows with PR-AUC = 0.93 using zero attack labels at training time. (3) This separation is architecturally nontrivial: an LSTM trained on identical token sequences degenerates to a majority-class predictor (ROC-AUC approximately 0.50, F1 = 0.91 by always predicting "attack"), proving that RWKV's causal pre-training provides an inductive bias unavailable to direct classifiers. Supervised fine-tuning further raises PR-AUC to 0.94 and ROC-AUC to 0.75, with a precision of 97.7% at the calibrated operating threshold. The RWKV backbone's O(T) recurrent inference enables per-packet streaming without flow buffering, making PLM-NIDS operationally viable at line rate. Because it reads only IP/TCP/UDP headers, it is inherently encryption-agnostic: TLS 1.3, QUIC, and future encrypted protocols are handled transparently.

Machine learning-based Network Intrusion Detection Systems often report near-perfect performance on IoT benchmarks. However, whether these models learn generalizable attack behavior or exploit spurious dataset shortcuts- such as static testbed IP/MAC addresses and chronological recording artifacts-remains an important question. We evaluate the CyberFlowIoT-GICAP benchmark, containing 3,617,388 flow records across 126 PCAP sessions with 849,395 benign flows. Four learning paradigms are evaluated across four feature configurations using PCAP-disjoint splits; LightGBM is additionally evaluated using conventional random-flow splitting. When only statistical flow behavior is used (Fbehav), LightGBM (92.58% +/- 8.18%), Random Forest (92.59% +/- 8.18%), and Deep MLP (92.55% +/- 8.18%) achieve nearly identical Macro-F1, indicating that performance is constrained by feature representation rather than model complexity. With raw timestamps (Ftstamp), tree-based models reach 99.28% Macro-F1, while the linear model remains at 90.62%, showing that nonlinear models can exploit dataset-specific temporal structure. Attack detectability is highly asymmetric: high-rate and active attacks maintain >99.8% recall from flow behavior alone in nonlinear models, whereas the DNS Beaconing drops from 27.78% to 0.00% recall when contextual features are removed. Conventional random-flow splitting increases attack recall by up to 14.00%, highlighting the effect of placing flows from the same sessions in both training and test sets. We conclude with a 4-point protocol checklist for realistic IoT NIDS evaluation.

Machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) have dominated Intrusion Detection System (IDS) research in recent years. Unfortunately, many existing studies have produced inflated results and unreliable benchmarks due to critical oversights and mistakes in the ML and DL pipeline, from data collection and labeling to feature engineering and model training and evaluation. CIC-IDS2017 is a standard benchmark for network intrusion detection. Still, many published results on this dataset are difficult to compare due to labeling errors, inconsistent flow extraction, potential leakage, and performance evaluation metrics dominated by benign traffic. In this paper, we present a comprehensive benchmark with corrected PCAP-level labeling and a complete evaluation pipeline with diverse ML models. We evaluate eleven tabular classifiers at three nested levels: binary attack detection, nine-class attack-family attribution, and fifteen-class fine-grained classification. A soft-voting ensemble of Random Forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM obtains the best fine-tier macro-F1 of 0.955, with coarse and binary macro-F1 scores of 0.980 and 0.999, respectively. We further conducted a feature selection study based on an analysis of feature importance. This comprehensive benchmark pipeline is configurable and open-source, enabling new feature extraction and model plugins for new datasets. Future work should use this pipeline as a reference point for richer features, rare-class analysis, and model generalization towards new datasets and attack classes.