UBD-Bench: Benchmarking and Analyzing Unimodal Branch Degradation in Multimodal Perception for Autonomous Driving
Organizations: Beihang University · Xiaomi EV · University of Macau
Abstract
Multimodal perception improves autonomous-driving performance by combining complementary sensor information. However, stronger multimodal predictions do not necessarily imply stronger representations in each modality-specific branch. Such branch-level weaknesses can remain hidden in conventional output-level evaluation. We introduce UBD-Bench, a systematic benchmark for studying unimodal branch degradation (UBD) in multimodal perception. UBD-Bench uses a Paired Frozen-Branch Probe to compare the task-relevant representation quality of the same modality after independent unimodal training and multimodal joint training under matched decoding conditions. Across four autonomous-driving perception tasks and 10 models, we find that Camera branches consistently degrade after multimodal joint training, whereas LiDAR branches exhibit weaker and more model-dependent changes, revealing a pronounced modality asymmetry. Hierarchical probing further shows that Camera-branch degradation extends from the visual backbone through the Camera-to-BEV pathway and is most severe at the pre-fusion Camera BEV representation. Guided by this diagnosis, we introduce unimodal-to-multimodal distillation at the degraded representation. This intervention consistently improves both Camera-branch Probe performance and full-model performance across all four tasks. These results show that multimodal gains can coexist with degraded unimodal representations, highlighting branch-level representation quality as an important dimension for evaluating and improving multimodal perception.
Figures & tables
| Task | Method | Metric | End-to-end | Camera Probe | LiDAR Probe | Fusion Probe | ||||
| Full C | Full L | Full F | C2C | F2C | L2L | F2L | F2F | |||
| 3D Det. | BEVFusion | mAP | 35.55 | 64.68 | 68.55 | 33.47 | 11.58 ( -21.89 ) | 47.69 | 47.70 (+0.01) | 62.56 |
| NDS | 41.21 | 69.22 | 71.41 | 36.49 | 19.02 ( -17.47 ) | 53.01 | 53.47 (+0.46) | 61.31 | ||
| CMT | mAP | 40.59 | 63.21 | 70.30 | 36.43 | 10.50 ( -25.93 ) | 61.64 | 61.88 (+0.24) | 53.24 | |
| NDS | 46.04 | 68.27 | 72.94 | 41.94 | 25.88 ( -16.06 ) | 67.23 | 67.78 (+0.55) | 60.06 | ||
| Vec. Map | MapTR | mAP | 48.57 | 54.26 | 63.14 | 51.09 | 40.42 ( -10.67 ) | 53.62 | 55.88 (+2.26) | 62.92 |
| Metric | Pos. | C2C | F2C ( ) |
|---|---|---|---|
| mAP | P0 | 51.09 | 40.42 ( -10.67 ) |
| P1 | 51.58 | 43.80 ( -7.78 ) | |
| P2 | 49.84 | 45.73 ( -4.11 ) | |
| P3 | 45.07 | 42.49 ( -2.58 ) | |
| P4 | 26.09 | 26.49 (+0.40) |
| Task | Method | Metric | Full multimodal model | Camera-branch Probe | ||
| Baseline | +KD ( ) | F2C | F2C + KD ( ) | |||
| 3D Det. | BEVFusion | mAP | 68.27 | 69.25 (+0.98) | 12.06 | 32.48 (+20.42) |
| NDS | 71.29 | 71.88 (+0.59) | 19.06 | 35.12 (+16.06) | ||
| Vec. Map | MapTR | mAP | 61.97 | 64.49 (+2.52) | 40.42 | 43.54 (+3.12) |
| BEV Seg. | BEVFusion | mIoU | 59.83 | 60.45 (+0.62) | 49.30 | 55.46 (+6.16) |
| Occ. | CONet | IoU | 25.30 | 29.30 (+4.00) | 20.10 | 21.50 (+1.40) |
Autonomous Driving Perception
Autonomous driving perception enables vehicles to detect and interpret road users, drivable space, and hazards using onboard and shared sensors.
See all 379 papers