Simulation Priors for Rapid Adaptation in Model-Based RL for Autonomous Racing

Robot learning requires adaptation methods that improve reliably from limited, mixed-quality interaction data. This is especially challenging in long-horizon, contact-rich tasks, where end-to-end policy finetuning remains inefficient and brittle. World models offer a compelling alternative: by predicting the outcomes of candidate action sequences, they enable online planning through counterfactual reasoning. However, training action-conditioned robotic world models directly in the real world requires diverse data at impractical scale. We introduce Simulation Distillation (SimDist), a framework that uses physics simulators as a scalable source of action-conditioned robot experience. During pretraining, SimDist distills structural priors from the simulator into a world model that enables planning from raw real-world observations. During real-world adaptation, SimDist transfers the encoder, reward model, and value function learned in simulation, and updates only the latent dynamics model using real-world prediction losses. This reduces adaptation to supervised system identification while preserving dense, long-horizon planning signals for online improvement. Across contact-rich manipulation and quadruped locomotion tasks, SimDist rapidly improves with experience, while prior adaptation methods struggle to make progress or degrade during online finetuning. Project website and code: https://sim-dist.github.io

Offline reinforcement learning (RL) has traditionally focused on learning policies for direct deployment under conservative objectives, where uncertainty outside the offline dataset is treated pessimistically to ensure robustness. We argue that this formulation becomes incomplete when an offline-trained policy is subsequently updated through online interaction, as increasingly occurs in modern intelligent systems through test-time adaptation and online fine-tuning. This position paper argues that, in such settings, the objective of offline RL should extend beyond immediate deployment and instead prioritize learning adaptive policy priors: policies that preserve the capacity to improve during subsequent interaction through memory, exploration, and self-correction. We formalize this perspective as adaptive offline reinforcement learning (AORL), distinguish it from offline-to-online RL, and explain why adaptability becomes important under distributional shift, limited dataset coverage, and changing test-time conditions. We further discuss Bayesian offline RL as one principled direction for constructing adaptive policy priors by preserving epistemic uncertainty over plausible environments. Finally, we outline connections, open challenges, and research directions for treating offline RL as preparation for future experience rather than as a static deployment problem.

Pretrained robotic policies can suffer substantial performance degradation under out-of-distribution (OOD) conditions encountered during deployment, motivating post-training through real-world interaction. However, reinforcement-learning (RL)-based post-training typically requires substantial environment interactions, a burden that is especially significant in manipulation, where each trial can be slow, costly, or destructive. Therefore, we present PEARS, a physics-prior-guided hybrid RL framework for sample-efficient online adaptation of pretrained policies with tactile feedback. After each episode, its physics-guided force reasoning (PFR) module uses physical priors encoded in a vision-language model (VLM) to diagnose failures from the visual outcome and tactile interaction history and update task-appropriate contact-force bounds. A high-frequency hybrid force-position controller then enforces these bounds during contact. Complementarily, tactile-conditioned diffusion steering reinforcement learning adjusts the latent noise of the frozen flow-matching policy to correct errors in free-space motion and contact timing without updating the base model. In simulation, PEARS improves success rates by 12.4-37.4 percentage points over the strongest per-task baselines. PEARS also reduces the number of interaction episodes required for a certain success threshold by up to 53.2% relative to the fastest baseline. In real-world experiments, PEARS achieves success rates of 95% on Whiteboard Erasing and 90% on Pipette Liquid Aspiration. These results show that combining the PFR module with policy steering can accelerate adaptation while reducing costly interactions. The project website is available at https://song-kun.github.io/pears.