cs.CVOct 21, 2026

An interpretable deep learning method for early hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis on multiphase CT

Authors: Emma Sarfati, Alexandre Bône, Pietro Gori, Sisi Yang, Marc-Michel Rohé, François Nicolas, Jeong-Min Lee, Jeong Hee Yoon, 

Organizations: Guerbet Research, Villepinte, France · LTCI, Télécom Paris, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Saclay, France · MAP5 (UMR 8145), Université Paris Cité, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, Paris, France · Radiology B Department, Hôpital Cochin, 27 Rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, Paris, France · 

Abstract

Early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma is critical to preserve access to curative treatment options. The Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) provides a standardized framework for non-invasive diagnosis on multiphase computed tomography, based on major visual imaging features. However, these features may be difficult to assess consistently, particularly in small liver lesions. We developed dLI-RADS, an interpretable artificial intelligence method designed to estimate the probability of hepatocellular carcinoma from multiphase computed tomography images of manually segmented liver lesions, while remaining aligned with LI-RADS-related imaging concepts. dLI-RADS combines neural network-derived predictions with handcrafted quantitative imaging measurements reflecting LI-RADS major features and integrates these inputs using logistic regression. In this multicenter retrospective study, patients with multiphase computed tomography and at least one liver lesion were included, while lesions larger than 40 mm were excluded. Histology served as the reference standard for hepatocellular carcinoma, and a composite reference standard was used for non-hepatocellular carcinoma lesions. The lesion-level accuracy of dLI-RADS and LI-RADS were compared on the internal evaluation set using 10,000-repetition bootstrap non-inferiority tests, with 5% margins and significance levels. On the external test set, sensitivities were similarly compared. dLI-RADS was non-inferior to LI-RADS for lesion-level accuracy in the internal evaluation set, achieving 80% accuracy compared with 74% for LI-RADS (p = 0.04)...

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. AMPLIFAI: A Multiphase CT Dataset for Benchmarking Clinical Reasoning in LI-RADS Assessment of Liver Lesions

    Aug 14, 2026Pranav Kulkarni, Nikhil Shah, Amritansh Suryavanshi +9Medical Image Benchmarks

  2. A Digital Pathology Resource for Liver Cancer Quantification with Datasets, Benchmarks, and Tools

    Apr 22, 2026Ying Xiao, Shimiao Tang, Xitong Ling +11Computational PathologyImage Segmentation

  3. Semantic Segmentation-Driven Image-Level Diagnosis of Liver Cancers in Hematoxylin and Eosin Histopathology Images

    Jul 3, 2026Ivica Kopriva, Dario Sitnik, Arijana Pacic +3Computational PathologyHistopathology Image Segmentation