Tactile-Based Robotic Manipulation: From Mechanics-Driven to Data-Driven Perspectives

Vision-based learning from demonstrations has achieved remarkable success in enabling robots to perform manipulation tasks and high-level semantic reasoning, yet it remains insufficient for complex, contact-rich manipulation. While there is broad agreement that tactile sensing improves manipulation, there is no empirical guidance on which tactile sensors are best suited for which manipulation tasks. In this paper, we provide a systematic, task-driven evaluation of tactile sensors for robot manipulation and propose a framework for selecting and evaluating sensors based on manipulation policy performance. Separate manipulation policies are trained for tactile sensors of four distinct modalities: visual, acoustic, magnetic, and resistive, across three tasks: pick-and-place with unknown mass, object reorientation, and plug insertion. For each task, an analysis of how sensor properties such as spatial resolution, shear sensing, and tactile representation, and the inherent material friction affect task performances is done. Rather than tactile sensing being universally beneficial in the same way, our results show that the usefulness of tactile information depends strongly on sensor modality, material properties, and the specific manipulation tasks. All of the tactile sensors, code, data, and hardware setup will be publicly available on the project website.

Tactile sensing is becoming central to robust, adaptive, and dexterous robotic manipulation. Beyond its traditional role in contact detection and reactive control, touch is increasingly used to learn transferable representations, condition manipulation policies, and support embodied physical reasoning. Yet existing surveys largely emphasize tactile hardware and perception, leaving the rapid shift toward learning-based tactile manipulation insufficiently synthesized. This paper reviews tactile-guided skill learning from a learning-centric perspective, organized by the functional role of touch across the learning and control pipeline. We examine tactile representation and policy learning, tactile foundation models, predictive and adaptive control, and generalization across objects, tasks, sensors, embodiments, and simulation-to-real transfer. Across these directions, we identify common design principles and remaining challenges in learning transferable physical representations, integrating semantic reasoning with contact-level control, and scaling tactile learning across heterogeneous data and hardware. Finally, we outline emerging directions toward tactile foundation and world models that can predict, reason about, and adapt physical interactions. Together, this review characterizes the transition of touch from a task-specific feedback signal toward a core modality for general-purpose embodied intelligence. An accompanying database of the reviewed literature and associated resources is available at https://sites.google.com/view/touch-in-robot-learning-review.

Tactile sensing can substantially improve contact-rich robotic manipulation, yet its practical deployment remains limited by the fragility, calibration requirements, and maintenance burden of tactile hardware. This raises a fundamental question: can robots benefit from tactile knowledge without requiring tactile sensors at deployment? We present TacImag, a tactile imagination framework that predicts tactile observations from vision and proprioception and uses the generated signals to guide manipulation policies. Trained from paired visuotactile demonstrations, TacImag enables touch-informed manipulation using only visual observations at test time. We evaluate TacImag on six simulated and four real-world manipulation tasks. Across simulation and real-world experiments, imagined tactile observations consistently improve manipulation performance without requiring tactile hardware. In real-world experiments, imagined force fields improve contact-sensitive tasks by 44.4% on average, whereas imagined tactile images improve texture-sensitive tasks by 23.3%, revealing that the effectiveness of tactile imagination depends strongly on the relationship between tactile representation and task requirements. Our results further suggest that tactile imagination does not simply recover missing tactile measurements. Instead, it acts as a form of contact-aware supervision that transforms subtle visual interaction cues into representations that are easier for manipulation policies to exploit.